Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 3:51 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:57 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17497
Location: Left Cuckistan
No arguing with your big brother. You aren't ready to take him on yet Jamil.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:02 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
This is why free agency is so good in its present form. Collingwood loses Thomas and the AFL gives them a free pick in the first round. They use it to pick up someone who will be hitting his peak in a few years when Thomas is on the slide and they have a win. Geelong thought the world was going to collapse when Ablett went but they scored two first rounders for him and haven't taken a backward step in reality.
If we were to trade some of our untouchables for two picks or a player and a pick, we get extra good players in. Imagine if we traded Gibbs and got (say) Adams and pick 30 for him. Adams would fit the bill and we get a pick to either use or couple with a player to trade up. (Say) Lucas and pick 30 for pick 20. All of a sudden we have Adams and pick 20 for Gibbs. Do we trade pick 20 for Savage? Two players for one.
If you need two cars in the family and have a Porsche, it's a no brainer to trade it for a Honda SUV and a Ute. That's what we never seem to do.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Blue Sombrero wrote:
If you need two cars in the family and have a Porsche, it's a no brainer to trade it for a Honda SUV and a Ute. That's what we never seem to do.


What if you have a 2006 WRX with hail damage and a VK Commodore with a dodgy transmission and no rego?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:15 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
If we trade our first rounder for Schoenmakers, I'm done.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
trublu wrote:
Synbad wrote:
We would look at chaps not only as a player but for leadership and mental toughness when games need to be won.
The kinds of things Murphy and co don't have.
Footy is also about what's going on between the ears


Isn't that why we traded away the world for Judd? how has that worked.



Hang on.

You are clearly a troll or one of MM's kids.

You say the club is holding MM back with it's trades and structure and we are basically doomed because Mick has no clay to work with. Ok, that's fine, that's an opinion many hold.

But then you say " we should have tanked and swapped Yazz and Pick 6 for Boyd"

Sorry, but who was in the coaches box? Mick flower Malthouse that's who. Was he being forced to win games?????

You go on to say that getting Daisy is a risk and letting Betts go is a mistake. HELLO!!!! Daisy is here because MM want's him. Betts is gone because we are not prepared to pay the ridiculous money that Adelaide is.

Listen, if you want to have fun as a troll OR you are Christie you still need to get your story straight.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:36 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17497
Location: Left Cuckistan
It's just junior synbad.

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:36 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
Blue Vain wrote:
padre wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Mentoring our players?
When did Chapman suddenly become Iron man? Its funny that the same posters complaining that Eddie, Yazz and Jeffrey cant play midfield are the same ones wanting to get a 32 year old half forward with dodgy hammys who's past it as a midfield option.

Lets be real here. Murphy averages more contested possessions, more tackles and more 1% ers than Chapman. Yet some of Murphys biggest critics are wanting to get Chappy. :lol:
Geelong aren't flicking him for fun. They understand he's taking the place of a young player. FFS, I'm sure some of you trawl around peoples nature strips looking through their hard rubbish.

Maybe they are getting rid of him because he is keeping out younger players who are ready to step up. This just shows how well the cats are developing their list. We are not in the same category.


You're not wrong there. We're not in the same category by choice

padre wrote:
We need leadership and hardness, geelong have buckets of it. We dont yet have young guys crying out to step up. I am all in favour if he rounds off our list for 1-2 seasons while others are developing.


Hardness?
We average more contested possessions, contested marks, one percenters than Geelong and we smash them in clearances. Its our uncontested possessions that kill us.
Now that is where Chapman specialises. The trouble is, its our gamestyle that doesnt endear itself to uncontested possessions. Bringing in a 32 year old wont change that. As for not having young guys crying to step up, bringing in old blokes to take their place on the list doesnt help. Use that spot on a young draftee.
Graham was killing it in the VFL this season and should have received more games. He shouldnt have to battle a Paul Chapman for a spot in the side.The young bloke should always get preference if he's showing enough.

That where you dont get it. Just because we have a chapman in the squad it doesnt necessarily mean that he will be selected. I would say that mm would play an up and comer if he is showing enough, by that i mean demanding a game. I dont think he will get a game unless he has reached a standard though. I think some of you have ocd when it comes to young players, yes you need plenty of them coming through, but you also need a blend of older, to put pressure on that spot. If he doesnt take a draft pick and is reasonable money it should be a reasonable deal. Say what you like , quote stats like ratten if you like, but chapman is much harder at the ball than our betts, garlett, yarren, he has the body with a low centre of gravity, that is plain hard to shift.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:38 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Heavs wrote:
It's just junior synbad.


Nah, even Synbad wouldn't leave that big a hole in his argument.

It's either Christie or Eddie.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:18 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
trublu wrote:
Hate to say this, but the pies are killing it this year.

They will have three first round picks to with the three they had last year. That's 6 quality players in two years to compliment the list they have.

In two years, they have rebuilt there list by being bold and brave.

Where as we can't even convince fringe players to commit to our club because we are paying overs for a players who's played no footy in two years


..rubbish.. ..this year DT left them, not their choice.. ..Shaw went a bit off the rails, not their choice.. .... ..they have benefited, but by default.. ..last year they pushed out dawes, lynch as a cheap alternative a big bust.. ..dawes played his role [kpf, not fwd/ruck that bucks tried to make him], but was also cheap cash and provided good leadership and helped keep the team smooth, there's more to him leaving than just his onfield role.. ..ripple effect saw ruffled feathers this season.. ..yes they got grundy i think with that pick [actually dee's 2nd rounder, not a 1st round], but could have used their first rounder on him just the same just a few picks earlier..



..and fringe players, aren't the sort to be gnashing teeth over when you miss out, after getting a genuinely topline player to come over.. ..and it's more like 1 year, he played most games last year..

..but if you'd rather pay overs for fringe players instead of an AA player, that's your perogative..


Benefit by default... two years running, how novel, might try that sometime. :roll: :roll:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
If Gibbs leaves next year and we receive pick 12 as compensation will people be claiming we are 'killing it'? I doubt it.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:08 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
cimm1979 wrote:
trublu wrote:
Synbad wrote:
We would look at chaps not only as a player but for leadership and mental toughness when games need to be won.
The kinds of things Murphy and co don't have.
Footy is also about what's going on between the ears


Isn't that why we traded away the world for Judd? how has that worked.



Hang on.

You are clearly a troll or one of MM's kids.

You say the club is holding MM back with it's trades and structure and we are basically doomed because Mick has no clay to work with. Ok, that's fine, that's an opinion many hold.

But then you say " we should have tanked and swapped Yazz and Pick 6 for Boyd"

Sorry, but who was in the coaches box? Mick flower Malthouse that's who. Was he being forced to win games????? YES

You go on to say that getting Daisy is a risk and letting Betts go is a mistake. HELLO!!!! Daisy is here because MM want's him. Betts is gone because we are not prepared to pay the ridiculous money that Adelaide is.

Listen, if you want to have fun as a troll OR you are Christie you still need to get your story straight.


The coach isn't employed to get the signatures of opposition players. Thats the role of the footy director and CEO in our case.

but funny how the only player we've managed to get to the club is via Mick and his relationship with the player. So it seems like others around aren't getting the job done.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:45 am
Posts: 422
What I think we really need is a CHF. The options that I can think of are Gumbleton, Mitch Thorp, Lewis Johnston and if the deal is right, Aaron Black or Robbie Tarrant. Another tall defender would be nice and more midfield run. The only way we can secure some of these names is to give something and the only real currency we have, as much as I don't want to give him up is Yarran. What do people think of these possibilities:

Yarran or Yarran and pick/player for:

Essendon* for Gumbleton and Jetta

Adelaide for Lewis Johnston and Bernie Vince

North Melbourne for Luke Delaney and Aaron Black or Robbie Tarrant (might be worthwhile looking at Ayden Kennedy in a separate deal).

Another thing I think Carlton need to look at is moving Judd to HBF. Gibbs played the best I have seen him play in the last few games when Judd was out with his knee. Players aren't getting developed in the midfield when he is there and his football brain, effort and field kicking would be better used back rather than up forward. This would also free up either/or Simpson/Tuohy for more midfield run.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:20 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:44 am
Posts: 835
Id rather be a player down on the field than see jetta in the Navy blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Yarran for Jetta. It just makes sense

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:45 am
Posts: 422
If we are as close to a premiership as we all hope and Yarran is traded, it could also be worth looking at picking up Krakouer for nothing. He can also go through the midfield and probably has a year or 2 left. Priority is a CHF though. I really would like to see Casboult hold down FF and back up ruck so a true CHF that would compliment him would be great. The problem is they aren't falling off trees and you need something to get one. Does anyone know anything about Mitch Thorp these days?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Mr. Cimm,

You want results from MM remember people like you were criticizing him for actually valuing the process well:

1. We actually won a final
2. We actually are active during trade week and at least pursuing the right options
3. We have secured an A grade player and traded a superflous ruckman for above his value.

So I think it would be reasonable to suggest MM's results justify his pay packet. Infact the mere fact that his given the
club some sense of momentum justifies his employment


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:36 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Pafloyul wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:

..rubbish.. ..this year DT left them, not their choice.. ..Shaw went a bit off the rails, not their choice.. .... ..they have benefited, but by default.. ..last year they pushed out dawes, lynch as a cheap alternative a big bust.. ..dawes played his role [kpf, not fwd/ruck that bucks tried to make him], but was also cheap cash and provided good leadership and helped keep the team smooth, there's more to him leaving than just his onfield role.. ..ripple effect saw ruffled feathers this season.. ..yes they got grundy i think with that pick [actually dee's 2nd rounder, not a 1st round], but could have used their first rounder on him just the same just a few picks earlier..



..and fringe players, aren't the sort to be gnashing teeth over when you miss out, after getting a genuinely topline player to come over.. ..and it's more like 1 year, he played most games last year..

..but if you'd rather pay overs for fringe players instead of an AA player, that's your perogative..


Benefit by default... two years running, how novel, might try that sometime. :roll: :roll:


..well, how benefocial remains to be seen.. ..dee's benefitted from McLean walking out on them, snaring our 1st pick.. ..they blew it on gysberts, who left them and at 2nd club after 1 yr now delisted.. ..benefits at draft table, but years later re-assess.. ..daisy walking out, shaw might leacve, dawes pushed.. ..all decent to very good players.. ..they've gone from runner-up, to knocked out of finals 1st week by poort in 2 years, in part by the 'shake-up'.. ..sure they have benefitted by default and gotten picks.. ..but, if i have a repeat top 4 and repeat grand final team and there is talk of dynasty, i don't wanna fall down the ladder and go a mini-rebuild just so i can get some youth, into a team that isnt old....

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
trublu wrote:
Hate to say this, but the pies are killing it this year.

They will have three first round picks to with the three they had last year. That's 6 quality players in two years to compliment the list they have.

In two years, they have rebuilt there list by being bold and brave.

Where as we can't even convince fringe players to commit to our club because we are paying overs for a players who's played no footy in two years


..stop playin' with it.. .... ..lookit, Daisy left them.. ..decision out of their hands.. ..shaw off the rails a bit in team sense, decision forced upon them.. ..don't play it like they're being bold and brave at trade time..

..in 2 years you say rebuild their list, i say in 2 years gone from grand final contenders and dynasty talk, to tumbling out of finals and hedging their bets with some youth, and some retreads desperately hoping to not slide down further..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 1:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Rabbit wrote:
What I think we really need is a CHF. The options that I can think of are Gumbleton, Mitch Thorp, Lewis Johnston and if the deal is right, Aaron Black or Robbie Tarrant. Another tall defender would be nice and more midfield run. The only way we can secure some of these names is to give something and the only real currency we have, as much as I don't want to give him up is Yarran. What do people think of these possibilities:

Yarran or Yarran and pick/player for:

Essendon** for Gumbleton and Jetta

Adelaide for Lewis Johnston and Bernie Vince

North Melbourne for Luke Delaney and Aaron Black or Robbie Tarrant (might be worthwhile looking at Ayden Kennedy in a separate deal).

Another thing I think Carlton need to look at is moving Judd to HBF. Gibbs played the best I have seen him play in the last few games when Judd was out with his knee. Players aren't getting developed in the midfield when he is there and his football brain, effort and field kicking would be better used back rather than up forward. This would also free up either/or Simpson/Tuohy for more midfield run.


Just heard you on the trade week radio.
Doesn't sound likely.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 10, 2013 2:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:45 am
Posts: 422
Ha ha yeah Plough didn't like my idea of trading Yarran for any of those picks. I don't know how we are going to try and get a good forward otherwise. Anyone have any ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluechampion, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], jake_h03 and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group