jezzarules wrote:
The better we go from here, the more likely John Longmire is to put his hand up for the job.
Also the better we go from here, the more momentum there will be for Josh Fraser to go for it too.
IMO in this scenario it's plausible that we'll have a succession plan arrangement.
I've seen it mentioned that Longmire would want 5+ years.
This I feel is only likely (and justified) if we had continued the early season trajectory and were looking at another rebuild which would need time to bear fruit. If an experienced coach goes to Essendon** they'll want and get that long.
With our list now looking more competitive, I suggest it's quite reasonable to offer Longmire a 2-3 year arrangement to see what he can do whilst Cripps is still going before handing over to Josh Fraser.
This then also solves the issue of Josh feeling not fully ready because he gets to learn from one of the best.
Anyone who wants concessions before they start is a big NO!
Longmire gets 5 years and then Fraser takes over? No thanks. Spells trouble to me.
If Josh isnt ready he isnt ready. Move on, or apply for the job.
I don't think Josh Fraser has engineered his own game plan. He is tweaking the Voss plan.
Is he adaptable? Does he see the future evolution of the game? I think Fraser does still have a lot to learn.
I've met Longmire a few times. Great guy. great memory. Much loved.
But he comes on our terms. He has to sell his IP to us, not the other way around.
Our club is set for success with the right coach and a 2-3 gaps filled, plus added cheap depth.