@#$%&! rich coming from one of the biggest soft cocks to ever pull on the Navy Blue and a big part of the loser culture over the past 20 years.

Even more brazen than Doc considering how he selfishly dragged himself to 300 games when he should’ve retired in 2019.

@#$%&! off Murph!

The AFL is actively tinkering with the rules to make it bruise-free and high scoring. Unfortunately we built a list suited to an inside, contested game.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa

Yup…..

we need six Craig Bradley’s….


kindest regards tommi





Make it eight….!

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!

and a couple of Campo's........wait.......hang on a minute

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan

HANGGGG-ONNN….!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!

Tell us how you really feel

I have said it before
And I’ll say it again
Change has to happen at the top.
Priestley lives in Sydney. Enough said
We rely on 4 poker machine venues to gain revenue
6 clubs have moved on or had nothing to do with poker machines
3 clubs Saints, Bombers and Richmond have one venue
2 of those clubs are like us in regards to the last 15 years unsuccessful

An AFL club should have nothing to do with poker machines because times change
That’s the key word
Times change whether you agree or disagree with poker machines
But AFL clubs should be seen as role models to the community
What makes it worse is we have a game to promote the impact of domestic violence against women and how to reduce it.
Yet problem gambling is one of the main causes
If any organisation allows this to happen then they will most likely make poor decisions in regards to to footy appointments
They simply don’t get it
It being how to be successful in 2026 and beyond
Until there is correct change at board level we won’t contend on field

True that we generate approx $20m in pokie revenues, however the argument isn’t complete without considering the AFL and clubs benefit from betting agency sponsorship $ to the tune of $50 to $60m.

While I don’t support this, I dont think it translates into we dint know how to run a football club.

What has pokie machines have to do with our on field performance?

Imagine we were shit and had no money? Then what ? People are going to use Pokies regardless. And we have to make money. We just need to promote safe gambling.

Its not like they are not trying to get other revenue sources. Maybe when that is profitable, then they look at the Pokies.

I agree about Priestley living in Sydney. We need a strong leader based in Melbourne. That is strong and bold. Priestley does not appear to be this for me. I could be wrong.

Well said

Time will change the sratus quo.

Let’s focus on footy ahead of us.

I feel changes in last 6 months are pointing us in right direction.

It’s only round 1. We have a season to gel, grow and improve. If we can be 6-6 half way through this season, I expect us to see huge improvement….this year, and again next year. Draft picks, salary cap space and 20 under 23s listed says so.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue

Publicity precious Presidents are overrated.

I don’t néed an Edie Maguire type. I can’t see how any President being the be all to end all for any club.

If a club can run without Presidential interference, or publicity, imo, that’s a well run club.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue

What it has to do with onfield performance is in 2026 it doesn’t align with what a sporting club should stand for
Every year at the AGM members ask about it but nothing is done
Even getting rid of one of the four venues and doing a separation slowly
It’s a lack of forward thinking and thinking in the broad sense.
To have a “ cause” match focusing on domestic violence against women is hypocrisy at it’s highest end and to me a plain embarrassment as a supporter
And this thinking filters down to the playing group
I hope Cripps doesn’t mean it when he says we stuck fat and that’s why we beat Richmond because he clearly is not looking at the bigger picture jut like the board whether it’s pokies or onfield performance
Because if he does then he simply is clueless on what it takes to be a successful team

I know you already know there's a bubble around the place, but it's a lot bigger than you think.

If we get rid of the pokies, we can replace that revenue 10-fold by selling steamed dim sims.

Dimmie economics (steamed only) are beyond reproach. A bag of 60 Marathon dimmies will run you $25 at worst. A box of four bags for about $80. Now, you sell those c-suckers for $1 a piece and you’re up $160 on the box.

Easy money.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.

I’m assuming from the above both of you know the team is affected by our gambling revenue.

Enlighten me. What is this bubble?

What does keogh already know and how big is what?

No need to be cryptic, I’m genuinely critical.

Personally I can’t see gambling revenue affect an 18-30yo handsomely paid professional footballers, who in the off season/ down time want to experience the outside world…outside the footy bubble.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue