HELLAS BLUE wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ah yes.. except the board has met a few times in the last 3 or so days and have ratified a reccomendation by the CEO...
Apart from that you might be right...
Look.. im a huge Fev supporter.. but really enough is enough and the stakes are too high now.
A few scenarios have come to light over the weekend...
But i hear.. the CEO doesnt want to be the man laughed at because of Fev...
So Fev at Cartlton next year looks very slim... one way or the other....
..... at this moment of time.. considering the board has voted to support Swann unanimously... it doesnt look good for Fev.
I hear ... he HAS been told .,...
But then again... who knows how these things are played out when push comes to shove...
But Hellas ou might know better than Swanny...
So it's not about the good of the club, it's about the CEO's reputation? If this is the case then our problems lie within club management, not Fev. BTW I'll take Fev over Swann any day of the week.
It is about the good of the club....
How is ridiculing the club good for the club?
How is ridiculing your CEO.. and your captain good for the club?
How is ridiculing sponsors .. the game youre representing and the club youre representing good for the club.
Fev is remorseful... but he has been remorseful before.
Ive supported Fev time after time...
But when does Fev realise that enough is enough?
Can the club continue to swallow the poison Fev keeps feeding it?
Fev might have 3 years left.. so at some point the club needs to move on anyway... 3 years earlier .. 3 years later...
Dunno... Fev might have to go to the club and PROVE to it.. he wants to stay...
Right now he is a liability....
.,... this is 2010 ....in footy terms...
Fev is still in 1996 when he was a teenager....