woof wrote:
Synbad wrote:
this is 2009.....
did the club follow each and every one of the 41/42 players home to make sure they all did the right thing???
stuff happens...
we cant afford it...
the players cant afford it..
the club cant afford it..
the sponsors cant afford it...
think of malaysia being a sponsor and then think about the kind of country malaysia is..
booze... dildos.....etc...
you have to have a brain....
its not about just the players anymore......
I understand your point but where do you want to draw the line?
The playing group is going to be left to their own devices for the next 6-8 weeks. Are you expecting the club to assign somebody to each individual player over this period? The next 6-8 weeks will be just as dangerous as the Monday that has just passed.
if alcohol wasnt a focal point of footballers and professionalism was .. why would i need to assign people on players 24 hours a day?
id have thought.. that with the slap in the face the club received when its players were thinking of the doggies game before the lions game was done.. the players would be stung too much to worry about getting cactus and playing with dildos supersized or not...
there needs to be a galvanisation and a steeling in the players if they wish to be succesful.. we have too many plonks and party boys and not enough leaders.. and its why we lost.
losing judd for the first 3 games next year is a good thing...
now we have the whole of the pre season to think about leadership...
... but its not going to happen with a booze and dildo culture is it???
might have been a nice statement by the group about next year.. if it was more civil....
a massive fuel fed celebration after losing the unloseable game is hard to support from me...