Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 12:27 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:50 pm
Posts: 1122
cant believe people still naming 206. . He's still playing 70% gametime in VFL which have shorter quarters! He's not ready yet. . You'll all see him in the next NAB cup game unless in the event of several injuries.

_________________
Cuck Follingwood


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Bock won't be back

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 2:00 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Teen Spirit wrote:
cant believe people still naming 206. . He's still playing 70% gametime in VFL which have shorter quarters! He's not ready yet. . You'll all see him in the next NAB cup game unless in the event of several injuries.


Agree Teen Spirit. The same applies for Pfeiffer & AB. Nowhere near AFL ready this year.

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 284
Stone Free wrote:
Did anyone notice how during kickouts, we targeted Cloke a few times? A strong mark on the defensive 50 is gold in that context, and put Warnock there instead, that kick and subsequent mark is almost a given and would provide a decent rebound point for an offensive play.

Bring in Warnock, it has to be done, please please please.


How has Warnock gone in the ressies in this regard? Does he mark most kickouts? (serious question - I have no idea)

Huge risk to bring in an underdone player for finals. Hopefully Hampson fit to return.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:37 pm
Posts: 22
ianh wrote:
If Hammer isn't ready to play what about going both Warnock and Jacobs, Kreuzer to CHF, Carlos to defence for height cover, Warnock in the pocket would be virtually impossible to outmark if the ball comes in high to the top of the square which means if he doesn't mark it there is opportunity galore for Betts/Garlett (Yarran?) If Jacobs doesn't cut it in the ruck then Warnock can take on that role. I don't believe there is room for both of the big boys in the same team longer term, but for his week perhaps a shoot out between the two for the one spot that may be up for grabs?




I like it, Kreuzer forward, to add marking options, and assisting Fev, in forward 50. We've got to bite the bullet and see what Warnock's made of before the finals. He played 3 games in the 2's and played OK on Sunday, he's 206 cm, bring him in, it could make a big difference if he wins the hitouts and we get first use to our midfielders. (Remember, we didn't do too well with clearances with Melbourne, so how are we going to go against Adelaide?) We won't win a final with ruck deficiencies, IMO.

No-ones mentioned Chris Johnson as a credible replacement. Played very good game for Ants Sunday, and is better than average defender, with good disposal, esp by foot?

I love Ando's attack on the ball and his courage, and his ability to run it out of defence. But I don't think he's a player that likes to "tag" or "run with" an opposition player. He's a bit too loose for my liking ATM, (look what Robbo did on him) and a risk going into a final series.

Army, if fit to come in to replace Ando.

I like Yarran, he's an X-factor, could be another Cyril Rioli type, we'll never know if we don't play him.

Other considerations... Grigg or Bentick to replace Hadley (Bentick has more inside grunt than Grigg..Do we need someone like this to get it out of the stoppages?


Out .., Cloke, Hadley, Ando, Wiggins.

In.. Warnock/Sauce or Hammer, (if fit), Yarran, Armfield, Bentick/Johnson or Grigg.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:30 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:05 pm
Posts: 162
With the three club suspensions and Hadley out we are going to make 4 changes minimum one week out from the finals. Hope Hammer is fit, yarran would have to come in now you would imagine, Army in, and some one else.

I still think we will win :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:34 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Dale wrote:
With the three club suspensions and Hadley out we are going to make 4 changes minimum one week out from the finals. Hope Hammer is fit, yarran would have to come in now you would imagine, Army in, and some one else.

I still think we will win :grin:


If Hammer is still out, it will be Sauce.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
I'd bring in CJ .... no the other CJ!
As an option across the HB line or play further up the ground on the wing

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Well that opens the door for changes... :lol:

Out: Betts, Cloke, Garlett (all idiots), Hadley (arm), Anderson

In: Armfield, Austin, Hampson/Warnock/Jacobs, Yarran, Browne/Johnson

I'm confident that Warnock is now fit enough, but if Hampson is good to go he would be my preference. Failing both of those, Jacobs will do fine. Perfect timing from Cloke and allays my fears about him surviving the chop.

Armfield, Austin & Yarran pick themselves, really.

Toss up between Browne and Johnson; two blokes who are midfielders with a solid defensive mind-set and relish the opportunity to attack, but if we're going to line Johnson up in defence, I'd rather have Browne because I know they won't use him there.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:39 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9870
Location: Australia
jimmae wrote:
Well that opens the door for changes... :lol:

Out: Betts, Cloke, Garlett (all idiots), Hadley (arm), Anderson

In: Armfield, Austin, Hampson/Warnock/Jacobs, Yarran, Browne/Johnson

I'm confident that Warnock is now fit enough, but if Hampson is good to go he would be my preference. Failing both of those, Jacobs will do fine. Perfect timing from Cloke and allays my fears about him surviving the chop.

Armfield, Austin & Yarran pick themselves, really.

Toss up between Browne and Johnson; two blokes who are midfielders with a solid defensive mind-set and relish the opportunity to attack, but if we're going to line Johnson up in defence, I'd rather have Browne because I know they won't use him there.


With the three idiots being suspended I doubt Anderson will be dropped, four changes is more than enough one week out of finals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The decision should help us not hinder us....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:49 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:05 pm
Posts: 162
Synbad wrote:
The decision should help us not hinder us....


I agree completely. It will help over the next month and for the next 10 years.

Can't wait for this weekend and the finals, as a younger Carlton fan I have experienced a different childhood to most of the older posters here, I went to high school when we couldn't buy a win, when our players were unprofessional and the running of the club was a joke. I can't remember our last final (I was in QLD at that time) but I am happy with the way the club is going. We are winning often, competitive almost always and the club is becoming a truly professional place... Great to see.

Blues to win by 3 goals and take the winning form into the first week of the finals. :grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15017
I would bring in another forward option, Yarran is the obvious one, plus another. The Crows have such a good defence and it will be even harder for Fev now with no Betts and Garlett.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:15 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:11 pm
Posts: 1226
Posted this in the "3 stooges dropped" thread, IMO all 3 would have been talked about at the selection table anyway IMO. I would have been happy for Betts to have been rested last week, he looks tired and in need of a rest. Garlett had a GREAT game, and it's a shame he has done this SOOO close to the finals as it will be a challenge for him to get back into the side for the following week, but he will learn and it gives Yarran a go in the Seniors. Cloke was LUCKY to be retained against the Demons, and would have been on the chopping block this week anyway. So, IMO, it's no MAJOR loss to the side for all 3 to sit out (Betts' and Garlett's forward line pressure will be missed, but it will be a challenge for the boys who come in to take over where they left off)

Changes

In/Out

Grigg/Hadley
Yarran/Garlett
Hampson (or Jacob's if Hampson doesn't come up)/Cloke
Armfield/Betts

I would prob move Anderson up forward to add some defensive pressure, and move Armfield down back to play as the small defender.


Alternatively Anderson could also make way for Austin, to help with height down back, but 5 changes in 1 week are a big too many IMO considering one of the strengths of the side of late has been the stable line up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 8:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
sinbagger wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Well that opens the door for changes... :lol:

Out: Betts, Cloke, Garlett (all idiots), Hadley (arm), Anderson

In: Armfield, Austin, Hampson/Warnock/Jacobs, Yarran, Browne/Johnson

I'm confident that Warnock is now fit enough, but if Hampson is good to go he would be my preference. Failing both of those, Jacobs will do fine. Perfect timing from Cloke and allays my fears about him surviving the chop.

Armfield, Austin & Yarran pick themselves, really.

Toss up between Browne and Johnson; two blokes who are midfielders with a solid defensive mind-set and relish the opportunity to attack, but if we're going to line Johnson up in defence, I'd rather have Browne because I know they won't use him there.


With the three idiots being suspended I doubt Anderson will be dropped, four changes is more than enough one week out of finals.

We need the height in defence, and we need to accommodate another attacking option. If you want to look at it more directly:

Armfield for Anderson
Another ruckman for Cloke
Austin for Hadley
Yarran for Betts
Browne/Johnson for Garlett

When you see it that way, we're actually injecting a more experienced player in for Anderson. If we don't bring in a guy like Johnson or Browne, we're going in with an overly defensive squad.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 2920
Location: at the Bay Oval....
The Crows in all likely hood will/could make up to 4 changes too.

Shirley out, and possible ins could be Griffin, Burton, Dangerfield & Petrenko...

Both sides will have changes.

_________________
Go to http://www.snoutslouts.org/ for a look at the mighty GFC...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Synbad is making sense...

dropping those three guys doesn't hurt us at all. For a start, we are better off with either Hammer or Jacobs (or Warnock) in the team than Cloke. And while Garlett looked good against Melbourne, he's been shown up against some of the better sides (not to say he won't be a good player by the way... he's just a work in progress). We'd miss Eddie at his best, but he hasn't been there for a while.

So presuming we bring in Hammer, Armfield, and Yarran with another player in to replace Haddles, then I don't see where we've gone backwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 9:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21574
Location: North of the border
Armfield will come straight back in if fit he has been good

Wouldn't be surprised if the 3 rucks were not ok to go that they would play big Irish there and bring in Austin or Hartlett to play defence

Grigg would have to come in you would think

and Ratts favorite Johnson would most likely be the other played on the wing and stevens or scotland moved into the centre


Play Judd and walker in the forward fifty as the chances are Judd will cop the heavy tag and be ineffective as an onballer so let he create a headache up forward

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:23 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 68
Why bring in Warnock / Hampson for Cloke when either will be 100%?

Prior to injury Jacobs looked okay for mine and surely must get the nod this week


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:57 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 10:40 pm
Posts: 166
I'll make a case for AB even though he is not a 'fashionable' inclusion.

AB managed 29 possessions on Sunday whilst heavily tagged. He earned every disposal. No cheap kicks. His opponent even followed him on and off the bench. At that level at least, the opposition rate him.

Grigg on the other hand and likewise Johnson, were not tagged.

Going into a cut throat week or two, I think we need a hard nut who can keep his head and handle the pressure. I have serious doubts that either Johnson or Grigg can and I don't think we can afford that against a well drilled unit like Adelaide.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group