aramari wrote:
Agree with you Josh, Clem is being pretty nasty here - poor form on his part and quite distasteful.
And might I ask whether you think that whether questioning his committment on the fact that he has a funeral he feels he should attend is also poor form and quite distasteful?
The reason for my reply is because of the fact that I believe the Josh has overstepped the line with those comments.
For the avoidance of any doubt, the reason for my use of the example if Yarran was Jewish was because Josh is from that background and the example would be something he would identify with. In other words, if a person attacked Josh's lack of committment to something because it was on Saturday when he is observing the Sabbath, then I think that would be inappropriate and insensitive just as it is here with a certain lack of sensitivity on Josh's part for the expected family requirements of indigenous family members to attend funerals. I could easily have used the example of a Christian who didn't want to play on Sunday or anyone with a cultural belief or any religious belief that could possibly imply a certain lack of committment. It is certainly not meant to target Jewish people, not in the slightest. I hold the same standard for all - questioning committment to a secular cause, particularly work related, on the basis of a certain cultural or religious belief is insensitive, disappointing and not something I condone, hence my admittedly strongly-worded reply.