Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 7:52 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Melvey wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
We're IMPROVING!

What more do you want this year?!


Can you please explain where we have improved since Ratten has taken over.


Ladder.

Percentage.

Teamwork*.

Skills*.

Prospects






* I'm the first person who realises that these points need a metric shitload of work before we're going to be a flag team, by the way.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:18 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
KK the draft penalties were 5 years ago...
The quagmire is a new quagmire if we cant take meaningful steps.

You cant just hope to improve....

I wanna see some changes in the coaches box at the end of the year...

if its not ratts it has to be to alot of those around him...

i want to see REAL improvement next year... not falling over the line against bottom 2 sides... Juddy flogged to death with his work load... a one dimmensional forward line... a midfield that runs one way... and are happy to chip the ball around with no potency... and a bunch of stoppers against average sides.

ratts plays to not lose.. not to win...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:18 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Beantown wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
I don't remember what concessions Port got when they joined the AFL.

I thought they were supposed to be a South Australian powerhouse, off and on the field. Wasn't that why they felt aggrieved that the Crows got the nod first?

Williams would not do one single thing, IMO to make Carlton any more successful.

And, while he's managed by that turd Ricky Nixon, he should be persona non grata at Visy Park.


They did get wanganeen and primus i think...






They also got to pick the eyes out of the SA under 18 squad from that season who won the national championship and are considered to be one of the more dominant teams that have won at the champs. Tredrea, Wilson and P Burgoyne are a few of the guys they got from that team If I recall correctly.


He also didn't inherit a list that had a core who had the mental scarring of being thrashed for a number of years. Not to mention being drilled to play a gameplan that was the antithesis of modern football. A lot of re-education was needed and it is still an ongoing process, as some of our blokes still revert to old habits under pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Synbad wrote:
KK the draft penalties were 5 years ago...
The quagmire is a new quagmire if we cant take meaningful steps.

You cant just hope to improve....

I wanna see some changes in the coaches box at the end of the year...

if its not ratts it has to be to alot of those around him...

i want to see REAL improvement next year... not falling over the line against bottom 2 sides... Juddy flogged to death with his work load... a one dimmensional forward line... a midfield that runs one way... and are happy to chip the ball around with no potency... and a bunch of stoppers against average sides.

ratts plays to not lose.. not to win...


I agree with everything you've said, except the last sentence. Even that does seem to be what happens against some teams, but I don't think it's the default position.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Belasarius..

Ratts is the man mentally scarred... not the players.

Ratts will use the Pagan card forever...

Sooner or later he will have to get up from his crawl and begin to walk....

Its too easy to blame Pagan....

Even Thomas didnt blame Watson Blight and their 100 years of darkness....2 years in....

Lame.....

Hes the coach... his job is to get the most out of the players as a group and individually...

Anyway.. glad you made that excuse up and i havent heard if from Ratts... he uses meaningless stats...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:23 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
Melvey wrote:
SA Blue wrote:
If they are obvious then please elaborate.

Organised / Disorgansied is a completely different thing.


I can see Melbourne's game plan and development evolving before Carlton's now thats not saying much.

Its hard not to doubt Brett Ratten when he has made more blunders than wins.

I've never expected this team to win the flag this year but expected to see improvement and that doesn't necessarily mean more wins on the board. Wanted to see some kind of system going forward, a more settled team and a game plan developing. Haven't seen any of that at all.


I am going to guess that as neither you or Synbad can define or articulate what a game plan is or provide examples of other teams then your points on the game plan is questionable.

People keep going on about it, but no one can provide actuals of what they mean.

We are a developing side, who still have issues and areas that we need to develop.

I can see where the team is developing and the structure we are trying to build.

Backs:

Agile and able to flexiblle to the changing nature of the modern games forward structure. 3-4 talls, all who have the ability to run as well. They Play on bigs and mids. This ability is the reason we match the Pies well. 2 half back flankers who provide run. Small backpocket.

Forwards:

Still a work in progress but Warnock is the key to this structure and the ability to release Kreuzer to second tall. O'Hailphin will play the 3rd agile target. Players such as Walker and Yarran are vital to bring flexibility to the structure. They are the mid size players that Geelong and the Pies utilisie so well. Betss and Garlett to provide forward line pressure.

Mids:
We can this is our strength. Need the bodies to harden up but this is progressing well.

_________________
Have I run too far to get home?


Last edited by SA Blue on Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:24 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Synbad wrote:
Belisarius wrote:
"
... and we still dont have a gameplan...
cant kick out... (get army to kick out)
cant distribute the ball.. (get army to distribute the ball)
cant get fev clear
judd is one on three...
cant block and make space
cant kick into space or to position..



I thought you'd be happy.

I can't remember Army kicking out, or distributing the ball.
We managed to get Fev clear a few times.
Judd wasn't one on three all the time.
A few times we blocked and made space.
We even kicked to space and position a few times despite the wind making life difficult.
I actually thought Ratts had been reading your posts and had taken your criticism to heart.
Well done :thumbsup:



Yeah it was a masterful performance...

Worthy of taking it to the pub and telling everybody about it...'

We fell over the line against Richmond....

We should be smashing Richmond.... or not???


Who said it was masterful, it was a crap game, but vital for us to win and we did :thumbsup: Be happy.

St Kilda should be thrashing West Coast or not :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:25 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Belisarius wrote:
He also didn't inherit a list that had a core who had the mental scarring of being thrashed for a number of years. Not to mention being drilled to play a gameplan that was the antithesis of modern football. A lot of re-education was needed and it is still an ongoing process, as some of our blokes still revert to old habits under pressure.


That is a cop out.

How has Ross Lyon got the Saints playing a completely different style of football then?

Matty Knights has excited his team and got them playing good football.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Why does StKilda need to thrash anyone?
2 games clear plus percentage...

Thats 3 games clear...6 or 7 to go...



yes?

no???

:thumbsup:

love the straw clutch arguments...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
SA handlballing it to a guy standing still while you play with a few stoppers and zone at the same time... is not a gameplan.

i appreciate it is a gameplan .. but you dont devise gameplans to lose....with the hope to win..

watch adelaide
dogs
stkilda
geelong
Essendon*
collingwood

theyre all playing to a pattern of play that includes the team as a whole and to their players individual strengths..the different styles they use are thougth out to win games of footy by maximisation of whatever they have at their disposal..

then watch us...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:32 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Synbad wrote:
Belasarius..

Ratts is the man mentally scarred... not the players.

Ratts will use the Pagan card forever...

Sooner or later he will have to get up from his crawl and begin to walk....

Its too easy to blame Pagan....

Even Thomas didnt blame Watson Blight and their 100 years of darkness....2 years in....

Lame.....

Hes the coach... his job is to get the most out of the players as a group and individually...

Anyway.. glad you made that excuse up and i havent heard if from Ratts... he uses meaningless stats...


So you don't think the players have any demons to exorcise? Waite was talking on ABC radio recently about how nervous he gets before StKilda games, due to the past thrashings. I guess Ratts was responsible for all those past hidings as well, even though he wasn't at the club :razz: .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:33 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
Melvey wrote:
Belisarius wrote:
He also didn't inherit a list that had a core who had the mental scarring of being thrashed for a number of years. Not to mention being drilled to play a gameplan that was the antithesis of modern football. A lot of re-education was needed and it is still an ongoing process, as some of our blokes still revert to old habits under pressure.


That is a cop out.

How has Ross Lyon got the Saints playing a completely different style of football then?

Matty Knights has excited his team and got them playing good football.


That has them in the exact same position as us.

Tell me, do you think the Essendon* game plan can win a flag?

They play a high risk style that can be closed down by the top sides, (Geelong, Brisbane, Pies and Saints) who have all shut them down easily. Their style won't win flags.

_________________
Have I run too far to get home?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:41 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
Synbad wrote:
SA handlballing it to a guy standing still while you play with a few stoppers and zone at the same time... is not a gameplan.

i appreciate it is a gameplan .. but you dont devise gameplans to lose....with the hope to win..

watch adelaide
dogs
stkilda
geelong
Essendon*
collingwood

theyre all playing to a pattern of play that includes the team as a whole and to their players individual strengths..the different styles they use are thougth out to win games of footy by maximisation of whatever they have at their disposal..

then watch us...


When I look at those teams I see

Experience hard bodied teams in their prime - Saints and Cats
A team about to be exposed - Adelaide hasn't played a top 6 side in almost 2 months.
Don't rate - Dons
Dogs - Good footy side, but will never win a flag with their current structure
Pies - They are a well organised team, with a coach coming up to over 10 years (?) of developing a side with 0 flags. Would you be happy with that?

_________________
Have I run too far to get home?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:41 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
SA Blue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Belisarius wrote:
He also didn't inherit a list that had a core who had the mental scarring of being thrashed for a number of years. Not to mention being drilled to play a gameplan that was the antithesis of modern football. A lot of re-education was needed and it is still an ongoing process, as some of our blokes still revert to old habits under pressure.


That is a cop out.

How has Ross Lyon got the Saints playing a completely different style of football then?

Matty Knights has excited his team and got them playing good football.


That has them in the exact same position as us.

Tell me, do you think the Essendon* game plan can win a flag?

They play a high risk style that can be closed down by the top sides, (Geelong, Brisbane, Pies and Saints) who have all shut them down easily. Their style won't win flags.


There style is modeled around Geelong's and THEY'VE WON A PREMIERSHIP.

What is ours thats gonna win us a premiership?


Last edited by Melvey on Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:42 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Synbad wrote:
SA handlballing it to a guy standing still while you play with a few stoppers and zone at the same time... is not a gameplan.

i appreciate it is a gameplan .. but you dont devise gameplans to lose....with the hope to win..

watch adelaide
dogs
stkilda
geelong
Essendon*
collingwood

theyre all playing to a pattern of play that includes the team as a whole and to their players individual strengths..the different styles they use are thougth out to win games of footy by maximisation of whatever they have at their disposal..

then watch us...


So they never stuff up and everything always works. You are unrealistic. Nothing is perfect.
Why is it that you only see what works at other clubs and what doesn't at ours. You will never enjoy the football again if you keep on being obsessed with the negatives, perceived or real. We are 8-7. With a bit of luck we could have been at least 10-5. I see that as improvement.

You mean the Collingwood and Dogs we beat by the way :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:48 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
Melvey wrote:
They play the same as Geelong and THEY'VE WON A PREMIERSHIP


You are not seriously comparing Geelong's style to the Dons. Geelong have a high possession (400+) constant movement style. They are not quick, but utilise hard bodies and good skills with a multi pronged small forward line. The Dons use speed of the half back line through the corridor. High risk, but when it comes off (against us :banghead: ) it looks good.

Essendon* have 1 plan, and no plan b.

Our style will be built around flexibility and run.

As i said in an earlier post, the flexible back line generating run will be key.

The absolute key will be the hardening of bodies in the mid field. Gibbs and Murphy in 2 - 3 years time will be coming into their peak. This is our time. 3 elite mids, with a deep rotation (Similar to the Eagles in 05-06) is our key advantage over the like of the Dons and Pies. They do not have the talent to go all the way.

The forward line is the least developed and I hope the like of Yarran (Synbad - are you still confident?) can become what we hope they can be.

_________________
Have I run too far to get home?


Last edited by SA Blue on Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
SA Blue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
They play the same as Geelong and THEY'VE WON A PREMIERSHIP


You are not seriously comparing Geelong's style to the Dons. Geelong have a high possession (400+) constant movement style. They are not quick, but utilise hard bodies and good skills with a multi pronged small forward line. The Dons use speed of the half back line through the corridor. High risk, but when it comes off (against us :banghead: ) it looks good.

Essendon* have 1 plan, and no plan b.


I read it as him comparing Geeling and St Kilda.

Don't see it myself.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 10:51 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
SA Blue wrote:
Melvey wrote:
They play the same as Geelong and THEY'VE WON A PREMIERSHIP


You are not seriously comparing Geelong's style to the Dons. Geelong have a high possession (400+) constant movement style. They are not quick, but utilise hard bodies and good skills with a multi pronged small forward line. The Dons use speed of the half back line through the corridor. High risk, but when it comes off (against us :banghead: ) it looks good.

Essendon* have 1 plan, and no plan b.

Geelong are also much more defensively accountable. They hold the record for the most tackles in a game in their premiership year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:05 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
SA Blue wrote:
Essendon* have 1 plan, and no plan b.


What was Geelong's plan B in last years grand final?

The Cats own the corridor. The Bombers use the corridor

Geelong play on and move the ball quickly. The Bombers play on and move the ball quickly

Geelong have bigger stronger bodies. The Bombers are a young side

Both teams play positive attacking football on there terms.

Both teams go out there to kick more goals than there opposition which is what's the game about


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
This thread goes in circles page by page - so many repetitive posts. Getting close to a wankfest.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fabulous, MPH78 and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group