Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:17 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 25
  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 25  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
jimmae wrote:
Yes, but the more you ask of his hands, the more likely they will succumb to their foetus nature and fail him.

Those other blokes didn't have tiny hands. He can't do a West, Diesel or Mitchell and collect and dish off in the same motion consistently, especially as he gets more and more finger injuries by playing this great game. Dunno about Kirk in the trenches personally.

Tiny arms and tiny hands lower his chances of being a successful footballer, it's that simple.


..granted, he ain't gonna be attempting the Kouta one handed pick-up.. ..but i still reckon he's gonna be v.good consistently, and would have finished off our midfield..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
Kouta
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..for where our list is at, we could not afford to take a 'risk' as you call it, with our first pick.. ..especially when a HFF wasn't our biggest weakness.. ..inside mid and chf/chb were by far our more pressing concerns in regards to building our list.. ..flashy silky flankers that pose a possible risk, that also have 'lazy' hype and which may take a few years to come good can just as easily be picked up later in the draft.. ..or rookie'd or psd..

:garthp:

Who were the silky flankers available at pick 40 or later? :wink: :?

Rich was viewed as a risk by six clubs...

Ziebell is gleaming as a potential miss for Brisbane if he continues his development and avoids injury.

The young Roo was shining at a struggling club with dud targets inside 50 and no leadership on and off the field.

Ziebell isn't playing with Black, Power, Drummond, Brennan, Brown, Bradshaw, Clark and co, but was holding his own like Murphy did in his first year.

Your attitude is even more questionable than usual if you think the only thing our list lacks is an inside midfielder, a CHF and a CHB.

Houlihan, Scotland and Stevens are on their last legs.

Yarran will replace them at half forward or sweeping off half back.


Last edited by Kouta on Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Effes
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19468
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Kouta wrote:
Yarran will replace them at half forward or sweeping off half back.


Or as a dynamic onballer.

Just on Rich, is he more of an outside player who has elite kicking skills or does he win his fair share of clearances?

Surely you pick the most talented player (amongst character etc)...our recruiters appear to have rated Yarran more talented than Rich. Why does Rich Vs Yarran have to be decided in their first year?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:28 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..Kouta, i said that an inside mid and chf/chb were our biggest concerns, of which there are more.. ..a good strong hff is another [thinking more RoK variety].. ..and of course we can always better our list but generally speaking i think our list's bigger weak links are those positions i highlighted..

..as for which silky flankers were picked up around 40ish and later..?.. ..who knows, they often take a few years to shine, but in 2004 LeCras went at 37 [i think?].. ..and that's my point, aside from KPP nowadays most first picks need to show something.. ..a player that may take a few years as a first rounder is just a delay on your list in a way.. ..cos yer list quite possibly isn't improving as quickly as your competitors'..

..now, i like zeibell and i reckon he's gonna be a good player, but i reckon we have his sort of player covered already [i.e Gibbs].. ..as for the brions, they have an aging midfield and addressed one component, a tough, young inside mid to help take them forward.. ..with our young up and coming midfield led by Judd that young tough inside mid is the last piece to the puzzle.. ..and just by watching how Rich plays his footy i reckon he'd be just as good at Norf..

..and how is my attitude questionable..?.. ..i recognise that Yarran will need time, and i'm hoping he fulfills his potential.. ..that doesn't mean i can't disagree with the club's choice to draft him over Rich.. ..sure players like hoops, snotto and stevens are heading towards their later football years but flankers we have a few of already.. ..JR, Walks, Grigga to name a few..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Effes wrote:
Kouta wrote:
Yarran will replace them at half forward or sweeping off half back.


Or as a dynamic onballer.

Just on Rich, is he more of an outside player who has elite kicking skills or does he win his fair share of clearances?

Surely you pick the most talented player (amongst character etc)...our recruiters appear to have rated Yarran more talented than Rich. Why does Rich Vs Yarran have to be decided in their first year?


..see, it's best we just concentrate on developing yarran for his position.. ..and leave thoughts of turning him into a midfielder for later on.. ..Rich is yer in and under mid, but can also work brilliantly when in space.. ..has a long, v.accurate kick that's unbelievable.. ..as for most talented player, Rich was rated right up the top at one stage, and him slipping to 7 is a bargain..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:39 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..Kouta, i could add that we rookie'd buddy's cuz and he's shown and given us some silk across the HFF.. ..we also psd'd Edwardo.. ..the dee's picked up davey after we snagged carrots.. ..there's plenty out there for recruiters to find....granted, the players i just named were all older, and Yarran's still very much got youth on his side.. ..but some posters say we need to be patient and i agree, it's just i think waiting a few years for a top ten pick [non-kpp] to come good is a steep price to pay, and by making you wait they really, really need to be something special.. ..doin' a Leon won't cut it for a pick 6..

..Mandy, not talkin' down Leon at all, by using him as a reference i'm assuming [now hoping i'm assuming correctly] that he wasn't a top ten pick....using him more as a reference of a player that's taken years to pair his good footy with consistency.. ..and also the talk of a hff later going into the middle..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
my two cents
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:07 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
jimmae wrote:
tiny hands lower his chances of being a successful footballer, it's that simple.


Do you think, your getting confused between footy and porn here ? :lol:

_________________
Scott, things aren't as happy as they used to be down here at the unemployment office. Joblessness is no longer just for Philosophy majors - useful people are starting to feel the pinch.
Top
 Profile  
 
blueboys101
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:32 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 327
neon leon is a gun in my eyes , and if yarran turns out like that i wont be complaining.
Top
 Profile  
 
aramari
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
blueboys101 wrote:
neon leon is a gun in my eyes , and if yarran turns out like that i wont be complaining.


He was a typical 10 touch a game FP for his first eight seasons until last year, and has stepped up his fitness to be a real gun of the comp this year. I don't want to have to wait until Yarran's 27-28 before he becomes a star. Better late than never, but better sooner than later, and better now than soon :thumbsup:
Top
 Profile  
 
SnickerS
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Carltn70 wrote:
Quote:
.i don't prescribe to all this baloney about limited upside cos they're a ready-made player.. ..that's like saying that geelong didn't hit the lottery with selwood cos he doesnt have huge upside.. ..and thats bollocks.. ..basically, both selwood and now rich are good enough to play well in good established midfields..

.. ..look at the other 'late' developers.. ..what do you expect of them..?.. ..another pre-season, more endurance, footy experience etc etc etc.. ..well, selwood and rich types are getting that too, and are also improving because of it, and if they're good they'll continue to push themselves and improve, as does any star player..

..and bloody hell, fancy calling a mid of Rich's ilk 'vanilla'.. ..that's crazy.. ..mids like him and selwood are similar in ways to mids like voss and roo [crow variety].. ..they dont come every year, and calling them vanilla is way off the mark..

..Rich may play the same style of footy in 5-7 years granted, but it will be better footy than he's already playing now.. ..and that's v.impressive.. ..he is also the exact kind of mid we need and do not have on our list.. ..it is the one missing ingredient to our midfield, and until we address this our midfield will be good, but not great.. ..in turn, Judd will need to play that role in the guts and the roll-on effect continues..

..for where our list is at, we could not afford to take a 'risk' as you call it, with our first pick.. ..especially when a HFF wasn't our biggest weakness.. ..inside mid and chf/chb were by far our more pressing concerns in regards to building our list.. ..flashy silky flankers that pose a possible risk, that also have 'lazy' hype and which may take a few years to come good can just as easily be picked up later in the draft.. ..or rookie'd or psd..


Spot On !!! :thumbsup:

Rich is NOT vanilla.....and if you can't see that then you have no reason to be discussing football.

Big gamble by the recruiters in getting Yarran......at the moment.....not looking too good. But I am prepared to give it some time.

Haven't we already got a silky skilled, flashy HFF who's a bit lazy :yikes:


Whats the definition of vanilla then??
Ive always thought vanilla to be short, one paced and not overly athletic, standard type of midfielder.
I must have been mistaken.

Granted the guy is a ball magnet and has a brilliant kick on him.
Simon Black is elite, and Simon Black is what daniel rich will never be. he doesnt have the body to be. His stature, arms, hands pace etc will always restrict him.

Im sorry, i just dont see what everyone else seems to bang on about him.
Top
 Profile  
 
TheBluesMuse
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:05 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
SnickerS wrote:
Whats the definition of vanilla then??
Ive always thought vanilla to be short, one paced and not overly athletic, standard type of midfielder.
I must have been mistaken.


I can agree with that.

And to those who say Murphy is the exact type of player I am banging on about then yes, he is and of all our up and coming youngsters he is my least favourite...there I said it. :yikes:

Now this is all just a supporters personal opinion.....it's my own likes and dislikes...I'm not saying those who would prefer Rich to Yarran are wrong just that i'm not a fan of players like Rich and unless he was clearly the more talented player at our pick would I have agreed with the selection.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger
Top
 Profile  
 
aramari
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
SnickerS wrote:
Carltn70 wrote:
Quote:
.i don't prescribe to all this baloney about limited upside cos they're a ready-made player.. ..that's like saying that geelong didn't hit the lottery with selwood cos he doesnt have huge upside.. ..and thats bollocks.. ..basically, both selwood and now rich are good enough to play well in good established midfields..

.. ..look at the other 'late' developers.. ..what do you expect of them..?.. ..another pre-season, more endurance, footy experience etc etc etc.. ..well, selwood and rich types are getting that too, and are also improving because of it, and if they're good they'll continue to push themselves and improve, as does any star player..

..and bloody hell, fancy calling a mid of Rich's ilk 'vanilla'.. ..that's crazy.. ..mids like him and selwood are similar in ways to mids like voss and roo [crow variety].. ..they dont come every year, and calling them vanilla is way off the mark..

..Rich may play the same style of footy in 5-7 years granted, but it will be better footy than he's already playing now.. ..and that's v.impressive.. ..he is also the exact kind of mid we need and do not have on our list.. ..it is the one missing ingredient to our midfield, and until we address this our midfield will be good, but not great.. ..in turn, Judd will need to play that role in the guts and the roll-on effect continues..

..for where our list is at, we could not afford to take a 'risk' as you call it, with our first pick.. ..especially when a HFF wasn't our biggest weakness.. ..inside mid and chf/chb were by far our more pressing concerns in regards to building our list.. ..flashy silky flankers that pose a possible risk, that also have 'lazy' hype and which may take a few years to come good can just as easily be picked up later in the draft.. ..or rookie'd or psd..


Spot On !!! :thumbsup:

Rich is NOT vanilla.....and if you can't see that then you have no reason to be discussing football.

Big gamble by the recruiters in getting Yarran......at the moment.....not looking too good. But I am prepared to give it some time.

Haven't we already got a silky skilled, flashy HFF who's a bit lazy :yikes:


Whats the definition of vanilla then??
Ive always thought vanilla to be short, one paced and not overly athletic, standard type of midfielder.
I must have been mistaken.

Granted the guy is a ball magnet and has a brilliant kick on him.
Simon Black is elite, and Simon Black is what daniel rich will never be. he doesnt have the body to be. His stature, arms, hands pace etc will always restrict him.

Im sorry, i just dont see what everyone else seems to bang on about him.


As I understand it, "vanilla" means a player is competent in most areas, but has no real weapons. That description does NOT apply to Daniel Rich. Simon Black is vanilla if Rich is vanilla, as is Sam Mitchell. Black is automatic Hall of Famer, Mitchell might get there, and Rich has started as impressively as you could hope.

As for Rich's arms and hands :garthp:. Watch him play, not his apparent deformities!
Top
 Profile  
 
Kaptain Kouta
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
aramari wrote:
As for Rich's arms and hands :garthp:. Watch him play, not his apparent deformities!


You're not allowed to call them deformities or defects any more. They have to be called "Congenital Anomalies"

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.
Top
 Profile  
 
Kaptain Kouta
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
TheBluesMuse wrote:
And to those who say Murphy is the exact type of player I am banging on about then yes, he is and of all our up and coming youngsters he is my least favourite...there I said it. :yikes:



GET. OUT. :fight: :fight:

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.
Top
 Profile  
 
Navy Blue Horse
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Bentley could be like a fine wine also

_________________
"I had to eat"
Top
 Profile  
 
TheBluesMuse
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:35 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
I know KK........

I've been sitting here for years not wanting to let it be known.....but there was a pretty good opportunity right there......*gulp*

:oops: :oops:

Who's gonna volunteer to protect me from DUC...anyone...?...errrm please?!

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger
Top
 Profile  
 
jimmae
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 10:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Bentley could be like a fine wine also

Cooking wine?

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.
Top
 Profile  
 
Juddy&theKruezers
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:16 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Bentley could be like a fine wine also


and so might the bottle of vingear in the pantry as well... :grin:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:49 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
TheBluesMuse wrote:
I know KK........

I've been sitting here for years not wanting to let it be known.....but there was a pretty good opportunity right there......*gulp*

:oops: :oops:

Who's gonna volunteer to protect me from DUC...anyone...?...errrm please?!


..nah nah, yer cool.. ..bein' blessed with 3 consecutive 1's we're all bound to have our favs.. ..for me it goes Murphos, Krooz, Gibblet.. ..but as for opportunities passed in Murphos' year can't agree.. ..even with hindsight he's still easily pick 1..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..vanilla usually means bland/boring/un-inspiring.. ..and Rich is none of those things.. ..he won't shimmy around an opponent, he's more likely to just bulldoze his way through.. ..and kicking those long accurate left footers is pretty damn exciting..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 25
  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 25  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], spiderman and 45 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group