Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 4:09 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 101  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
old55 wrote:
How did Ratts get the job, let me speculate...

Carlton were chasing Voss hard but then he decided he didn't want to be coach yet.
You had Judd on the gaff but needed early picks to seal the deal - the PP was beckoning.
Ratts was a candidate for the Melbourne job after Daniher resigned.
He got appointed as caretaker at Carlton and withdrew from the MFC race.
Carlton needed to lose all remaining games for the year, the only way for that to happen was with a complicit coach.
Ratts was told that wins don't matter.
To avoud this situation you really needed to appoint a caretaker with absolutely no ambition to coach and a willingness to lose to get Kruezer and Judd to the club - but that would've been quite tricky.
You managed the situation very well overall to land Judd and Kruezer but the result was that Ratts got the job without due process.

FWIW I think you're jumping off way to early and the comparison with Richmond in the 80s is eerie. It's not going to be difficult for a club that has had an aeon of success followed by a short down period to begin to eat its own when that success does not return immediately. Murphy, Gibbs and Kruezer are still babies and Warnock hasn't even played yet. Waite is out. I'm not sayiing there are no issues and over-reliance on Judd and Fev is a start. But I think you need to be a little patient.



Sticks should have been caretaker coach...

Then due dilligence...

Now were caught in the sludge ... especially with the extension... and Sticks as president.

Doesnt take long to be a Richmond either... you just need to continually make the worst decisions.
They were not shit 25 years ago..... but with a series of mistakes they bace shit!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:37 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
GWS wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


You'd almost think they had Camporeale as an assistant coach...

Did Essendon* get him straight out of retirement?

That's OK unless they're Teague and Lappin...

Unless they're coaching at Essendon* like Hickmott and Camporeale, former Carlton players should stick to writing for Inside Footy. :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
baz_baz wrote:
99prelim wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Like already stated the discussion is about the credibilty of those who constantly bag. They may be credible...they may not...the jury is out till they put up :thanks:


OK, can you let the Mods know that from now on, please attach supporting evidence, affidavits, full medicals and professional CV's when giving an opinion.....or as you put it, "bagging"


Good idea...maybe we can start with you...just PM it to me... :thumbsup:


So.......just to make the whole process transparent, can you tell us how you became the gatekeeper......just so there are no issues later

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Last edited by Mrs Caz on Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Note to everyone...try and clean up your quoting please! makes it much easier for everyone. Thanks *thumbsup*


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sydney
Synbad wrote:
old55 wrote:
How did Ratts get the job, let me speculate...

Carlton were chasing Voss hard but then he decided he didn't want to be coach yet.
You had Judd on the gaff but needed early picks to seal the deal - the PP was beckoning.
Ratts was a candidate for the Melbourne job after Daniher resigned.
He got appointed as caretaker at Carlton and withdrew from the MFC race.
Carlton needed to lose all remaining games for the year, the only way for that to happen was with a complicit coach.
Ratts was told that wins don't matter.
To avoud this situation you really needed to appoint a caretaker with absolutely no ambition to coach and a willingness to lose to get Kruezer and Judd to the club - but that would've been quite tricky.
You managed the situation very well overall to land Judd and Kruezer but the result was that Ratts got the job without due process.

FWIW I think you're jumping off way to early and the comparison with Richmond in the 80s is eerie. It's not going to be difficult for a club that has had an aeon of success followed by a short down period to begin to eat its own when that success does not return immediately. Murphy, Gibbs and Kruezer are still babies and Warnock hasn't even played yet. Waite is out. I'm not sayiing there are no issues and over-reliance on Judd and Fev is a start. But I think you need to be a little patient.



Sticks should have been caretaker coach...

Then due dilligence...

Now were caught in the sludge ... especially with the extension... and Sticks as president.

Doesnt take long to be a Richmond either... you just need to continually make the worst decisions.
They were not shit 25 years ago..... but with a series of mistakes they bace shit!!!


Not wrong even our supporters are resembling Richmond supporters - The Rot has realy set in :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:54 pm 
Offline
Melbourne Supporter

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 5:19 pm
Posts: 301
Synbad wrote:
Sticks should have been caretaker coach...

Then due dilligence...


Yes that would've been ideal but it would have been a big ask with the Judd ball in the air too.

Look we appointed Riley who was a candidate and he went and won against the Dogs and you in R22 cutting us off from a PP in 2007 (say Callan Ward) and pick 2 last year (Naitanui). It would've been far better if we had organised that differently but I accept that it would've been a big ask.

That said, with that knowledge in hand we better not screw up getting picks 1 & 2 this year - another loss to WC this weekend should seal it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:39 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
old55 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Sticks should have been caretaker coach...

Then due dilligence...


Yes that would've been ideal but it would have been a big ask with the Judd ball in the air too.

Look we appointed Riley who was a candidate and he went and won against the Dogs and you in R22 cutting us off from a PP in 2007 (say Callan Ward) and pick 2 last year (Naitanui). It would've been far better if we had organised that differently but I accept that it would've been a big ask.

That said, with that knowledge in hand we better not screw up getting picks 1 & 2 this year - another loss to WC this weekend should seal it.


You'll beat WC for sure ol55. Nervous times ahead for true dees supporters. Be assured, getting 1 AND 2 is the right thing to do for you guys.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:45 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
MarkNo3 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
old55 wrote:
How did Ratts get the job, let me speculate...

Carlton were chasing Voss hard but then he decided he didn't want to be coach yet.
You had Judd on the gaff but needed early picks to seal the deal - the PP was beckoning.
Ratts was a candidate for the Melbourne job after Daniher resigned.
He got appointed as caretaker at Carlton and withdrew from the MFC race.
Carlton needed to lose all remaining games for the year, the only way for that to happen was with a complicit coach.
Ratts was told that wins don't matter.
To avoud this situation you really needed to appoint a caretaker with absolutely no ambition to coach and a willingness to lose to get Kruezer and Judd to the club - but that would've been quite tricky.
You managed the situation very well overall to land Judd and Kruezer but the result was that Ratts got the job without due process.

FWIW I think you're jumping off way to early and the comparison with Richmond in the 80s is eerie. It's not going to be difficult for a club that has had an aeon of success followed by a short down period to begin to eat its own when that success does not return immediately. Murphy, Gibbs and Kruezer are still babies and Warnock hasn't even played yet. Waite is out. I'm not sayiing there are no issues and over-reliance on Judd and Fev is a start. But I think you need to be a little patient.



Sticks should have been caretaker coach...

Then due dilligence...

Now were caught in the sludge ... especially with the extension... and Sticks as president.

Doesnt take long to be a Richmond either... you just need to continually make the worst decisions.
They were not shit 25 years ago..... but with a series of mistakes they bace shit!!!


Not wrong even our supporters are resembling Richmond supporters - The Rot has realy set in :wink:


Make the right decisions and get the right people at the club and we wont have anything whing about.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:39 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Good to see you on here again old55. The Dogs win was the disaster for the Dees. With NicNat and Ward plus 1 and 2 this year added to current young talent, 2012-17 would be looking good. I guess the nervous nellies on here, and I am one, see a window that only opens for a few years and then there is someone else to take your place. If you don't grab success when the window opens, it can be shut for a long time. We are impatient, but we are also nervous that we have all the off field stuff in the best hands to make the most of our opportunities. In 2007 we could have left Pagan as coach for the last few games. No problems for the PP and a clear field to pick from for coach. Maybe Ratts would have got it, but it would have been a serious process that ensured he really was the best available and not just in the right place at the right time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


Ok so theyre frontrunners who easily account of us.. each time they play us.
Doesnt say much about where were at.....and we havent played Geelong.


So how bad are the Bulldogs and Collingwood going...they've lost to us and we're terrible.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Blue Vain wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Its not just Ratten. The whole football department needs a overhauling


9 games left, 6 of them against bottom 8 sides. Logic tells you we're over the hardest part of our draw and on the downhill run.
Heaven forbid we'll make the finals and maybe even win one. :eek:

What will you sook about then?
Some people need to remember where we've come from.


Reasonable point except that you are talking about something that has not occured whilst we are discussing something that has already occured.

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:27 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:56 am
Posts: 61
Ratten hasn't got the strategies to coach successfully. Kernahan must not be involved at all in the football department of the club. He has been involved in the football department far to long certainly during Carlton's worst years .He is the ultimate survivor both were great players.Ratts cant coach and Kernahan has been there far to long.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


Ok so theyre frontrunners who easily account of us.. each time they play us.
Doesnt say much about where were at.....and we havent played Geelong.


So how bad are the Bulldogs and Collingwood going...they've lost to us and we're terrible.


Last time i looked theyre 3 games clear of us.......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


Ok so theyre frontrunners who easily account of us.. each time they play us.
Doesnt say much about where were at.....and we havent played Geelong.


So how bad are the Bulldogs and Collingwood going...they've lost to us and we're terrible.


Last time i looked theyre 3 games clear of us.......


Yeah, but they lost to us....terrible old gameplanless oldboys club us.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


Ok so theyre frontrunners who easily account of us.. each time they play us.
Doesnt say much about where were at.....and we havent played Geelong.


So how bad are the Bulldogs and Collingwood going...they've lost to us and we're terrible.


Last time i looked theyre 3 games clear of us.......


Yeah, but they lost to us....terrible old gameplanless oldboys club us.

Yes but the Collingwood game we played their reserves...

And theyre stilll miles ahead of us...

We lost to the Swans and the Saints in 1995....

So what???

Theyre playing football that has them in the top 4..and they can afford to drop games to us.....

But get this straight in your thought process,....

.. if clubs make the four and have a shake at a flag... but you arent there.... but get a huge woody cos u beat them ...and were miles behind that same opportunity .....you have just been transformed into a StKilda supporter from the eighties...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:57 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Essendon* are front runners and wont achieve anything under Knights.
They are 16th for blocks in the AFL and their playing philosophy is based on running ahead of the contest. In fact, Knights instructs his players to avoid blocking and to run hard to create an option for the recieve!
When the game is nice and open and they're controlling the uncontested ball, they're world beaters but when the opposition dominate the tempo of the game, they are garbage.
The key is to make them accountable for their actions. Our players need to spread from the contest when we win possession and control the uncontested ball as well. Teams too often take them on and focus on the contested possession but taking advantage of their "looseness" is the key.

Have a look at their effort against Geelong. 78 points down at 3/4 time before Geelong rested all their stars.
Teams need to have a gamestyle that is sustainable in September as well. Theirs wont come close.


Ok so theyre frontrunners who easily account of us.. each time they play us.
Doesnt say much about where were at.....and we havent played Geelong.


So how bad are the Bulldogs and Collingwood going...they've lost to us and we're terrible.


Last time i looked theyre 3 games clear of us.......


Yeah, but they lost to us....terrible old gameplanless oldboys club us.

Yes but the Collingwood game we played their reserves...

And theyre stilll miles ahead of us...

We lost to the Swans and the Saints in 1995....

So what???

Theyre playing football that has them in the top 4..and they can afford to drop games to us.....

But get this straight in your thought process,....

.. if clubs make the four and have a shake at a flag... but you arent there.... but get a huge woody cos u beat them ...and were miles behind that same opportunity .....you have just been transformed into a StKilda supporter from the eighties...


:lol:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:03 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Well the fact that the Pies have played the Dees twice wouldn't have contributed to them being 3 games clear.

The love in between the Sailor Man and J&K is most distressing. :lol:

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
DownUnderChick wrote:
Well the fact that the Pies have played the Dees twice wouldn't have contributed to them being 3 games clear.

The love in between the Sailor Man and J&K is most distressing. :lol:


You can blame that on the coach as well... :cool:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Rattens not the biggest concern for me ....
The club culture is a concern... "Carlton swagger"... sounds good..but at this age of drafts and salary caps.. multi million dollar turnovers... fighting for corporate sponsorship.. huge tv rights who want succesful clubs.....AFL handouts... and an overall homogenisation of the league... you have to be very good to get ahead.

If youre not a cutting edge club you wont do it...

Our biggest strengths from the past ihave now become our achilles heel.
Where we look back and inwards.. other clubs are pioneering and exploring possibilities that may give them the smallest of edge.
Interstate clubs dont come with the baggage of the VFL so theyre more likely to be more daring in the search for the edge that may be enough to tip the scales to their advantage... so in the past decade is it any wonder interstate clubs have won the majority of flags?????

while some clubs look back to the days of the VFL... other clubs are groundbreaking...

Pratt was great in that he gave us a cash injection.. which we needed and will be grateful forever for... but as an ex player from a bygone era.. and surrounded by dinosaurs... maybe we looked too much to within instead of looking for the best possible and that would have meant from outside.. as none of the blokes have been involved in a flag for 15 years... dont have the qualifications... and have a bond that was rooted to ancient hisory in footy terms..
The modern game has changed more in the last 10 and especially 5 years than it has for a century before ...and its speeding and evolving weekly...

You need the best possible!!!.. on and off...!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:33 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
DownUnderChick wrote:
Well the fact that the Pies have played the Dees twice wouldn't have contributed to them being 3 games clear.

The love in between the Sailor Man and J&K is most distressing. :lol:


Actually the Pies are only 2 games clear.

2 games clear = 2 games against the Dees.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
DownUnderChick wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Well the fact that the Pies have played the Dees twice wouldn't have contributed to them being 3 games clear.

The love in between the Sailor Man and J&K is most distressing. :lol:


Actually the Pies are only 2 games clear.

2 games clear = 2 games against the Dees.

Still two games clear..........

... but if youre looking to knit pick DUC.... :razz:

Theyre a side that doesnt have a great list and it goes about the game in a workmanlike manner.. and theyre well drilled...

Malthouse has had them up... if you compare their lost for a long time....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2019 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 ... 101  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Anencephalic, DesEnglish, diesel95, GMCbris, jpulice1969, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group