Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 10:18 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
@#$%&!...what a game. That last Carlton passage of play made my blood pressure go up and made me aware that I had multi personality disorder. I was cursing at Army when he played on and almost got tackled. Then hailed him as god when he broke the tackle and got a run on. I was ready to turn g*y for him when his kicked turned into a Fev mark.

After Fev kicked, I seriously screamed like a girl. I thought he kicked it until I heard the commentator said it hit the post. Man...that feeling when I heard that was absolutely unbelievable. I was ready to commit suicide. It wasn't Fev's fault though.

Wallsy was right when he said our bottom players are not good enough. Getting there though. With Walker, Grigg, Yarran (assuming he plays to his draft position), Browne, Hadley, Robinson etc. to choose from, we are looking very good.

Still disappointing though...@#$%&! I thought we had that...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:10 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
true_blue3 wrote:
i haven't watched the game as yet but judging by what i heard on the radio benji's thoughts are warranted.

however, for those who were at the game or have watched the game did you notice if he was doing anything to help judd as he picked up 33 disposals and had over 20 uncontested possessions?

even if he did, i imagine it won't be enough to save his spot in the team and hadley seems like a no-brainer reaplacement.


There were costly skills errors, that killed us. Too hard to see off the ball stuff on tv. In today's game there is no where to hide, skill wise.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:27 pm
Posts: 6261
Location: Conservative Brisbane :O(
I thought the Hawks tried to really put some serious hurt on particular playhers and it wasw great to see that they responded...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 230
true_blue3 wrote:
i haven't watched the game as yet but judging by what i heard on the radio benji's thoughts are warranted.

however, for those who were at the game or have watched the game did you notice if he was doing anything to help judd as he picked up 33 disposals and had over 20 uncontested possessions?

even if he did, i imagine it won't be enough to save his spot in the team and hadley seems like a no-brainer reaplacement.


Bentley performance today consisted of fumbles and getting out muscled inside. He for the lack of a better word gave us "nothing".

Wouldn't have picked him ahead of Robbo, Hadley, Yarran or Browne. I just can't understand the discussion that would have taken place between the MC that would have led to his inclusion today.

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON @#$%&! THE REST


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:12 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Benji wrote:
I'm still at a loss as to how the MC came to the decision to play Bentley today ahead of Hadley, Robinson or even Yarran.

We effectively played a man down and on today's game i cannot understand how they in all their wisdom could have picked him to play against the reigning premiers.

Either Robbo's or Hadley hardness would have got us over the line today.

Even Yarran who had 10 tackles and kicked 3 goals could have provided more for us today then Bentley did.

This is nothing against Bentley as a player just the decision making process behind his inclusion today.

Thoughts?


At least he didn't shirk it like a couple of TCs favourite protected species did.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
our toughness today was fantastic - we did not lose because they out muscled us. In fact most of the time we won that little baby hands down.
We lost because when our a graders rest we struggled.

and because they took every @#$%&! opportunity in the first half and we didn't.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:13 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 1:44 pm
Posts: 302
This is my first post after viewing for quite a while and i have to say that i am PROUD of the way we are developing... sure there are improvements to be made but the way way we perservered and never gave in where in the past we might have been run over shows 'we are coming'.

Goyou good things.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:14 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
carrots also had the fumbles today - and crucially at times most of our players - thats what the best teams in the comp do, they make you fumble. We'll get better at that.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 230
budzy wrote:
Benji wrote:
I'm still at a loss as to how the MC came to the decision to play Bentley today ahead of Hadley, Robinson or even Yarran.

We effectively played a man down and on today's game i cannot understand how they in all their wisdom could have picked him to play against the reigning premiers.

Either Robbo's or Hadley hardness would have got us over the line today.

Even Yarran who had 10 tackles and kicked 3 goals could have provided more for us today then Bentley did.

This is nothing against Bentley as a player just the decision making process behind his inclusion today.

Thoughts?


At least he didn't shirk it like a couple of TCs favourite protected species did.


Who had less impact than Bentley?

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON @#$%&! THE REST


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:18 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
They know we're coming. :thumbsup:


We now have a core of premiership players, imo.

We just have to be strong in selection and play only those who are mentally capable of getting the job done.

I agree with those who say our bottom 6 selected players are not good enough.

Really hoping the likes of Austin Yarran Browne Robinson Hammer and a couple of others can come in help take us to the next level over the next few years.

Judd is magnificent!

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
yep, tried hard and hopefully that's it. With 1 more player with pace I think we would have won. Seriously, we need to get that about football in 2009.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
Benji wrote:

Bentley's game today consisted of fumbles and getting out muscled to every contest he was in. For the lack of a better word he gave us "nothing".

Can see what discussion would have led to the inclusion of bentley bofore Robbo, Hadley, Browne or Yarran. This is a blunder and Ratten needs to be held accountable and not make the same mistake again. I'd expect a decsion like that to be made in the "Pagan era".


Bit harsh there Benji. Ratten took a gamble. A gamble that didn't pay off and we lost by only 4 pts. We didn't get thrashed. Hindsight is great. But even with hindsight, what makes you think the inclusion of a another player instead of Bentley would have been the difference. What makes you think we wouldn't have lost by more than 4pts?

The gamble with Bentley didn't work out. But a bit harsh to get stuck into Ratten like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
Benji wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
i haven't watched the game as yet but judging by what i heard on the radio benji's thoughts are warranted.

however, for those who were at the game or have watched the game did you notice if he was doing anything to help judd as he picked up 33 disposals and had over 20 uncontested possessions?

even if he did, i imagine it won't be enough to save his spot in the team and hadley seems like a no-brainer reaplacement.



Bentley's game today consisted of fumbles and getting out muscled to every contest he was in. For the lack of a better word he gave us "nothing".

Can see what discussion would have led to the inclusion of bentley bofore Robbo, Hadley, Browne or Yarran. This is a blunder and Ratten needs to be held accountable and not make the same mistake again. I'd expect a decsion like that to be made in the "Pagan era".




Yes - sack Ratten - flog the rest of the MC..... :garthp: You armchair champions have such an easy time - dont you? :screwy:

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10407
Location: Coburg
no, what is happening is that we are getting closer (we are coming) and the closer we get the more pressure will build on the coaching panel to get it right - until

a) they get it right and we win the flag or

b) we get a new coach

and thats how it should be.

The hard thing for a club is knowing are we still moving to a)

or is it time for

b)

and that is football!

so get off ya @#$%&! high horses and let us discuss football.

right now is Ratts time to learn - I hope he learned some stuff from today.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:27 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 230
exsing wrote:
Benji wrote:

Bentley's game today consisted of fumbles and getting out muscled to every contest he was in. For the lack of a better word he gave us "nothing".

Can see what discussion would have led to the inclusion of bentley bofore Robbo, Hadley, Browne or Yarran. This is a blunder and Ratten needs to be held accountable and not make the same mistake again. I'd expect a decsion like that to be made in the "Pagan era".


Bit harsh there Benji. Ratten took a gamble. A gamble that didn't pay off and we lost by only 4 pts. We didn't get thrashed. Hindsight is great. But even with hindsight, what makes you think the inclusion of a another player instead of Bentley would have been the difference. What makes you think we wouldn't have lost by more than 4pts?

The gamble with Bentley didn't work out. But a bit harsh to get stuck into Ratten like that.


Your missing the point? What was the need to take a gamble at the stage?

When you make selctions you need to have some dort of theory behind them and unless somebody can explain to me what that theory was then Ratten needs to be held accountable.

Not an acceptable selection considering we had better player in the reserves last week and proven players at that.

Bentley wasnt selected to do a job of any sort so why we he be picked ahead of Robbo(30 os last week) and Had's (anzac medalist).

This taking a gamble at the cost of 4 premiership points does not sit well with me.

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON @#$%&! THE REST


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
bentley would not have been picked because he sat in the front row for the match reviews or cos he bought ratts a coffee and a doughnut

seriously

he would have been picked with a plan in mind and it would be a bit of MC failure and a bit of failure on Bentleys part that it didnt come off

que sera sera

i will be suprised if bentley plays next week

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:32 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 230
grrofunger wrote:
bentley would not have been picked because he sat in the front row for the match reviews or cos he bought ratts a coffee and a doughnut

seriously

he would have been picked with a plan in mind and it would be a bit of MC failure and a bit of failure on Bentleys part that it didnt come off

que sera sera

i will be suprised if bentley plays next week


From what you saw today what was the plan for Bentley?

he wont play next week time to be in Yarran and let him and Eddie explode on the rest of the comp!

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON @#$%&! THE REST


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
i would have thought when i heard of his selection he would be used around the stoppages and as a long kick to break the zone

it didnt come off and bentley showed he probably doesnt have the skills to match that plan

it failed

hopefully we learn and as i said id be suprised if he plays next week

learn and move on

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:40 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:48 am
Posts: 230
grrofunger wrote:
i would have thought when i heard of his selection he would be used around the stoppages and as a long kick to break the zone

it didnt come off and bentley showed he probably doesnt have the skills to match that plan

it failed

hopefully we learn and as i said id be suprised if he plays next week

learn and move on


I understand what you are to say but with that in mind is it something that he was capable of doing better the Had's or Robbo?

Ratten is the head coach he gets paid the big bucks to make these decisions and as seen as i saw the teams on Thursday night i knew if we lost it would be because we wouldnt have enough contributors and that's the way it turned out.

If you going to take these sorts of gambles on player make the against bottom 8 sides not the reigning premiers. We could have nipped this "bogey side" issue in the butt today but we failed to do so.

_________________
WE ARE CARLTON @#$%&! THE REST


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
Pretty good effort I reckon . The fight-back in the last few minutes was classic stuff .

Hadley instead of Bentley and we would have won . He ( Hadley must come in ) . We miss Jacobs too , and Grigg .
Great games from Fev , Judd , Stevens , Murphy , Betts , Waite , Kreuser and Bower was good on Franklin .
We had several players down though . We all know who they are . ( so do they ) .

Roughead is a very good KP forward , too good for Thornton today . BT did try hard though , but was outclassed .

_________________
Get the facts first.
Then you can distort them at your leisure.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group