Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 25, 2025 9:40 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 3:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Never one for wanting to give Carlton TOOOO much credit, the Hun has again cheapened a Carlton win.

Ok, granted it's the pre-season competition - and maybe I am reading into it a little too closely... but check this:


http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25124320-19742,00.html

Full strength Blues beat depeleted Hawks

Quote:
Carlton will never get a better shot at Hawthorn, which rested nine premiership players and lost two more, Campbell Brown and Stephen Gilham, before halftime.


Full-strength? Ok, the Hawks were missing quite a few players... but now let's check this:

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,25124319-19742,00.html

Hawthorn has lost three more players to injury

Quote:
Carlton was missing Andrew Walker, Andrew Carrazzo, Heath Scotland, Robert Warnock, Chris Yarran, Simon Wiggins and Matthew Kreuzer.


Ahh the full strength Blues.

Just missing a couple of hacks that would struggle to make it into the side. :wink:

Arguments could be made for every one of those players being in our best 22. Some don't need arguments made at all.


I'll tell you right now, at least 5 or 6 of those guys will be a part of our next premiership squad.


But I mean hey, the headline is probably a lot more palatable for some than one like:

"Carlton, missing one thirds of their best 18 - still comfortably beats last years premiers".

Amiright?! :razz:

_________________
Cheap Bike Insurance
Selling Baseball Cards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:39 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Sorry mate but i see nothing with what they wrote. We come up against the box hill hawks and just got over the line


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
I'll give Tassie Buddy and Hodge, but the others missing are average. Just players who were lucky to be in the right team at the right time. The Des Hedland effect....

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:57 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Melvey wrote:
Sorry mate but i see nothing with what they wrote. We come up against the box hill hawks and just got over the line


So 12 Premiership players + Taylor is a reserves team? Only 20 Premiership players could of possible played you realise?

Of course Hawthorn are a better team than us currently, but to say we played a reserves team is wrong.

You also need to check history as to how teams change once they won a Premiership, a group of players like Thorp, Dowler, Tuck, McGlynn, Kennedy could be regulars this year replacing some of those who didn't play yesterday.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:27 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Melvey, I was mainly relating to the fact that Carlton are 'full strength' against a Premiership side quoted as 'depleted' when whilst all they are really missing from close to a full side is Buddy and Hodge (wonder how many Roughhead would have kicked if Franklin was playing?) - whereas Carlton, missing:

Kruezer (Pick #1)
Carrotts (B&F winner)
Walker (Pick #2)
Scotland (2nd in B&F - 2007)
Warnock (206)
Yarran (Pick #6)

and the Wiggler (straight out champion)... is considered 'full strength'.

Pfft.

_________________
Cheap Bike Insurance
Selling Baseball Cards


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:30 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
SparkyBlue wrote:
Melvey, I was mainly relating to the fact that Carlton are 'full strength' against a Premiership side quoted as 'depleted' when whilst all they are really missing from close to a full side is Buddy and Hodge (wonder how many Roughhead would have kicked if Franklin was playing?) - whereas Carlton, missing:

Kruezer (Pick #1)
Carrotts (B&F winner)
Walker (Pick #2)
Scotland (2nd in B&F - 2007)
Warnock (206)
Yarran (Pick #6)

and the Wiggler (straight out champion)... is considered 'full strength'.

Pfft.


out of those i'd give you Walker, Kruez and scotto


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
yibbida wrote:
I'll give Tassie Buddy and Hodge, but the others missing are average. Just players who were lucky to be in the right team at the right time. The Des Hedland effect....


come on man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
As crappy and lazy as that article is, you have to give the HUN this:

Quote:
To dwell on the Hawks' dwindling player numbers would be an injustice to the Blues' ability to overcome a ragged start and eventually coast to a 24-point win.


That's the third para of that article.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
It's just the usual no balls commentry from the media. Anyone who has their name in record for all to see/hear will go the safe route everytime. It is the reason we always hear the same boring comments from these guys, and if you were to write off the current premiers or talk up the new up and coming team then more than likely you will have it come back on you.

I reckon it's also some of the reason that the so called top teams get a fair run with the umps as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
On the day, we won, they lost.

End of story. Have a :beer:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group