Sydney Blue wrote:
Beano wrote:
SB, I am sorry if I am running over old ground here, and it may be in another post, but what or where does your deep deep dislike, sometimes venomous, sometimes hatred, of Setanta come from, it's rarely objective, nearly always one eyed.
I know my view is skewed, but I know enough to see he doesnt make as much F ups as others in the backline, ok, occasional clangers, but when they happen they are highlighted more so than T bird or others, Ackland and De luca were classic examples, ADL was teh worst player I have ever seen, yet when Carlos did somehitng wrong it was labelled a jjoke, ' ah look at teh big Irishman, still coming to grips with the game' or ' that might be ok in gaelic or hurling but still getting to used to the footy', it goes on and on.
I maintain he is a useful player, not brownlow but enough to be in the panel week in week out.
My only complaint is that when Gehrig or someone like Lloyd starts messing, forarms are not enough, give him an equaliser.
I hated Pagan I don't hate Setanta - what I don't like about this Irish experiment is that both he and his brother are not good footballers and if they were born in Australia they wouldn't even make it to the the draft camp . I find it insulting to every kid who has busted his butt trying to win a spot in a team to be over looked because there are two players from Ireland filling a fantasy .
AFL is a highly skillful game and it takes years of playing it to read the play and play the game properly - I don't get off on this idea that you can grab any 200 cm Atheletic person and turn them into an elite footballer over the space of a couple of years - Kennelly got by because he played a game similar to ours as with Clarke - they also have speed to kill which gives them more time to hide their lack of foot skills - Aisake and Setanta don't have that .
If you pull on that Navy Blue jumper it is a privilege and a privilege reserved for the most highly skilled going around there are 22 places in that team and proberly over 200000 kids who would love the honor of filling one of those positions - These two guys were given a free ride into one of those privileges positions and I dont think for one minute that the try any harder than anyone else on that list .
So no hate for them just a distaste in my mouth over the whole concept
Thanks for the insight SB. Good question Beano.
I never looked at it like that; and it's a fair enough position SB. I can see why you feel the way you do.
My take on the Irish experiment takes a few different points of view and facts into consideration as to why we went with the Irish experiment:
1. The Draft Penalties left us picking players on the draft list who were barely fringe players; Setanta probably had the same upside, if not more than those available at the time. There wasn't much choice at the time...it wasn't called Black Friday for just getting caught....the penalties put our club in a space no other had ever experienced (Fitzroy didn't have draft penalties imposed on them)
2. We were the shortest team in the comp bereft of talls for years, and the draft gave us no option (apart from picking at scraps which we did, mind you) so we looked elsewhere; we had to think laterally and got Setanta. Either the scraps or Setanta were going to stand up and be counted, or both. History says that only Setanta remained on the list.
3. The experiment did reap rewards for the club; who else was going to be the utility who also rucked for us in times of need at the time? We could have gone for a tall kid, but Mick Nolan types are no longer a good fit at AFL level, even if they are one of the 200000 kids busting their guts to make it. We tried getting the discards/ scraps to fill the void (Mott, McLaren, Ackland...) but none of them were as useful as Setanta (he's still on the list).
4. Of the 200000 kids available, lets face it, in a professional sport, it's not a charity, and in selecting one who was never going to make it in place of Setanta was not a good enough reason to select them in the first place; that's also a case of giving a kid a 'ride' just because he's played footy since he was a kid.
5. In professional sport you select the best you can to fit the team's requirements: Ben Graham and Sav Rocca aren't world beaters at grid iron, but fill a need...they too were an experiment. There's nothing wrong with that (maybe the parents of the kicker that didn't make it is upset). The team is bigger than the individual. At Carlton we want success and we hedge our bets to suit our charter. I don't care where they come from, as long as they have more upside than the second choice.
6. Jim Stynes, Kennelly, Smith...well they too were experiments...but they came off. So there was a precedent and I'm glad to see Jimmy Stynes win a Brownlow; he deserved it. He busted his butt. I feel priveleged to see such an underdog with everything going against him work his butt off till he reached the top; a good lesson to all 200000 kids out there aspiring to reach the top.
7. Aisake was lucky. Right time right place and the club could see some potential and required phyisical attributes; he was rookie listed as an international rookie, not a standard rookie.
8. There is an international rookie spot for teams to use if they wish, if they don't then none of the 200000 kids born in Oz can take the spot, so it's not as if they took some Ozzie kids spot.
The selection of Aisake and Setanta was within the guidelines of AFL rules; they were experiments we were entiltled to use if we wanted to...or miss out. We chose to not miss the chance, and we were in no position to turn our noses at any opportunity to add to our list at the time they were selected.
Geez, I'm glad blokes like Paul 'Molly' Meldrum didn't have to be part of any system to be considered as a 'legitimate' VFL/AFL player. He by passed 200000 kids who were busting their guts to be VFL/ AFL player but had the balls to ask for a run...that's history now. His story I do not consider as a 'free ride'. but I can see how SB's argument would well classify Molly's position as such.
How, why or when Setanta and Aisake came onto the list is now history. But lets not let the facts get in the way of a good story; it's unhealthy. We move forward. We take what we can get (including a Judd, a Hadley and a Warnock where we can...who cares what opposition supporters say), and we develop them to the best of our ability. If they make it they do, if they don't they don't. Most don't make it. Lets face it Setanta has done very well and has earned the right to be on the list. It's not as if he's not been giving it 100% effort, so we have to admire that he is respecting our beloved jumper and club.
SB, the Irish are on our list through legitimate means, within the rules and guidelines of the AFL, not as you think a 'free ride'.