Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 24, 2025 11:01 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: BRING BACK THE NOTCHES
PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:05 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:15 pm
Posts: 209
Location: Set of Boogie Nights
Before people tell me yes I know the topic of riverting back to the circa 70's -80's Carlton CFC mongram on our Jumpers has been discussed at length on this forum before. If I can remember correctly there was mixed opinion and preference for both the old and new mongram was evident.

The other night I had a mate around and we watched a replay of the 1987 GF and seeing the notches again made me wonder why the hell did we rivert to the new 'modern' monogram? who's idea was it? my mate who isnt even a Carlton supporter also agreed that the notches version looks heaps better than our current version.

I think its again time to explore the possibility of going back to the old CFC mongram again. I miss the notches and the way our jumper used to look.

I think if the support is overwhelmingly in favour of the notches then we should start up a petition and present it the club.

How good would it be to have the notches back in time for number 17!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:32 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:27 pm
Posts: 6261
Location: Conservative Brisbane :O(
The topic of riverting back to the circa 70's -80's Carlton CFC mongram on our Jumpers has been discussed at length on this forum before...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Did the monogram on our guernsey from that era really have the notches on it?

They really only appeared on the 1998-2005 version.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:43 am 
Offline
www.blueseum.org
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:02 am
Posts: 1623
From our records, TBB is right:

http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... b+Monogram

From the Blueseum

_________________
Check out www.blueseum.org for all of your Carlton information needs.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:52 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
I was reading a copy of a letter sent to recruit a player from the club back in 1928 last night.

The 1928 Carlton Football Club letterhead has a logo with the CFC and the monogram has no notches.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:56 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
The issue of the notches on the guernsey has nothing really to do with history or tradition.

The traditional "CFC" monogram that was on our jumper up until 1997 was only of that style because at the time of its inception around 1927 that was about how far technology had evolved to mass produce a monogram which could be sewn on a jumper - the monogram at this time was basically hand cut from a pattern and sewn to each jumper - it would have been too difficult to hand cut the logo to match our our logo as it appeared on our crest with the Latin motto.

The correct Carlton monogram which matched our corporate logo was finally introduced in 1997 - because it could be mass reproduced correctly on a jumper.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:41 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 259
Location: adelaide
Why was Craig Bradley's C always thicker than everyone elses??

P.s. Bring back the Laurel Wreath also!


Last edited by vangipuss on Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:00 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:21 pm
Posts: 108
Location: noosa
Rumour has it that the current "circumcised" monogram that replaced the "notches" monogram was instigated by a board member keen to "modernise" the corporate logo. It was done during a dark period of Carlton's history, and was nothing more than a desperate act to look as though the committee was actually doing things. The process involved getting out a ball point pen and filling in the offending notches. No designers were engaged. No research gathered. Just a desperate act by a self important official. Last year I spoke to a Carlton big-wig and he told me that the "notches" monogram remained the favoured version, but fact was we were 'stuck' with the current monogram. He encouraged me, and supporters, to contact the big man himself and push for restoration of the "notches" logo.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:32 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 536
Location: Melbourne
Pardon my ignorance- but what "notches" are you all talking about? The ones of the 1926-96 vintage (which I prefer) or the post '97 ones? If the majority want a restoration of the notches, I'm in favour....... :thumbsup:

_________________
Be positive to all those @ TC- the wait is almost over!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20246
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Notches in this thread are being confused with the old jumper monogram...

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 12:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20246
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Here is the original argument

http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=6580
Quote:
Exhibit A: Notches that we know and love.

Image

Exhibit B: Notchless underpants...

Image

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
bluehammer wrote:
Notches in this thread are being confused with the old jumper monogram...



Sorry. :oops:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20246
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
Oh no problem, but SEE WHAT THIS HAS DONE??? :lol:

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24645
Location: Kaloyasena
bluehammer wrote:
Oh no problem, but SEE WHAT THIS HAS DONE??? :lol:



Given you something to do. :wink:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
johntall wrote:
Rumour has it that the current "circumcised" monogram that replaced the "notches" monogram was instigated by a board member keen to "modernise" the corporate logo. It was done during a dark period of Carlton's history, and was nothing more than a desperate act to look as though the committee was actually doing things. The process involved getting out a ball point pen and filling in the offending notches. No designers were engaged. No research gathered. Just a desperate act by a self important official. Last year I spoke to a Carlton big-wig and he told me that the "notches" monogram remained the favoured version, but fact was we were 'stuck' with the current monogram. He encouraged me, and supporters, to contact the big man himself and push for restoration of the "notches" logo.

I contacted Stephen Gough more than once to compain when the monogram was changed. We exchanged
a few '' in your face '' type letters, and had some robust phone conversations.
My contention at the time was the club letterhead had simply been transferred to the club guensey, a point which Goughie eventually conceded.
Each version of the monogram over the past decade has looked cheaper and inferior to the previous one.

Why someone within the club would bring about this bastardisation of the club guernsey is beyond me.

How should a Carlton monogram look? As i have posted previously, have a look at any photo of John Nicholls
in action, it doesn't get any better than that.

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:39 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
bluehammer wrote:


... and here are even originalier arguments. :lol:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=13858
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=15465
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7362
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11529

just to name a few!

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:29 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
I like it...and the clash guernsey too :oops:

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:37 pm
Posts: 417
murraycray wrote:
johntall wrote:
Rumour has it that the current "circumcised" monogram that replaced the "notches" monogram was instigated by a board member keen to "modernise" the corporate logo. It was done during a dark period of Carlton's history, and was nothing more than a desperate act to look as though the committee was actually doing things. The process involved getting out a ball point pen and filling in the offending notches. No designers were engaged. No research gathered. Just a desperate act by a self important official. Last year I spoke to a Carlton big-wig and he told me that the "notches" monogram remained the favoured version, but fact was we were 'stuck' with the current monogram. He encouraged me, and supporters, to contact the big man himself and push for restoration of the "notches" logo.

I contacted Stephen Gough more than once to compain when the monogram was changed. We exchanged
a few '' in your face '' type letters, and had some robust phone conversations.
My contention at the time was the club letterhead had simply been transferred to the club guensey, a point which Goughie eventually conceded.
Each version of the monogram over the past decade has looked cheaper and inferior to the previous one.

Why someone within the club would bring about this bastardisation of the club guernsey is beyond me.

How should a Carlton monogram look? As i have posted previously, have a look at any photo of John Nicholls
in action, it doesn't get any better than that.



Murraycray if you look on carltonfc.com under the Mamma Mia headline you will see a picture of a footy card with John Nicholls on it.

The thing is the mongram looks very much like todays version 'sans' notches.

I think the one you are referring to has a squashed pointy looking C in it, is this right?

Personally I think the 1 J nicholls is wearing on the CFC website is great and looks like todays version!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Isn't a "notch" an indentation?

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2138
bluehammer wrote:
Here is the original argument

http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=6580
Quote:
Exhibit A: Notches that we know and love.

Image

Exhibit B: Notchless underpants...

Image


Out of these two guernseys above-

I like the notchless version better on the guernsey as it appears thicker and a bit more streamlined.


The notch one is good on letterhead and in small things, but really as long as Carlton starts winning I wouldn't care for which variety they wear. They could even wear the M&M version if they want.

Out of the three monogram designs - the 1920's to 97 version is by far (by a continents length) the best one..it is the most robust and has the thickest monogram. ...but as long as they win I don't care anymore about which guernsey they go for.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MPH78 and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group