camelboy wrote:
budzy wrote:
What would've been the harm in waiting till the mid-season break to make a decision on whether Ratts was taking us in the right direction?
They've gone unnecessarily early on this, IMO.
Firstly,
how do you define the "right direction"? If you have passion and love for the club as one small factor, then Ratten is miles ahead of anyone else available now or in the short-term future. Ratten gives the players genuine belief. Not just on game day, but belief in the Carlton Football Club. Who else pre or post Pagan could have done that better than Ratten?
Sure, there's more to coaching than passion, we all know that. Trouble is, no matter how much due diligence (or not) a club puts into signing a coach, the proof is in the eating. A coach needs time to prove himself.
Premierships, as a rule, are won by clubs with stability. Stability at board level, and stability at coaching level. The board has simply ensured there's 2 more years of stability at coaching level.
Only thing is, without the benefit of hindsight, nobody knows right now if it was dumb decision or a masterstroke. I can kind of understand the gun-shy attitude many have, but in two or three years time we could just as easily be saying how great it was watching Ratten and Judd holding that cup aloft on the last Saturday in September.
If/when that happens, I spose we'll all remember what clever chums our board were for showing such foresight.
Whatever.
GO BLUES!!!
From now I'll define the 'right direction' as more wins than losses.
2 scenarios come the split round break...
a) we're 2 wins/9 losses.. we're still too fevcentric with a disfunctional game plan and Ratten is still unsigned, what would you be thinking?
b) we're 8 wins/3 losses.. we have a multi-pronged attack with a spread of goalkickers with a number of unheralded young players taking the next step and Ratten still unsigned, what would you be thinking?
Are both scenarios a chance of being reality?
If the answer is yes, he's been re-signed prematurely.
No harm in waiting a little longer, IMO, to digest some more before making a decision.
Did they go early to avoid potential media heat? If so, that's a bit weak.