Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 1:17 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Should Ratten get a contract extension?
Yes, till 2011 30%  30%  [ 45 ]
Yes, till 2010 26%  26%  [ 39 ]
No! .. wait till later next season to decide. 43%  43%  [ 64 ]
No!! ..sack him now!!!!!! 1%  1%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 149
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
TruBlueBrad wrote:
jimmae wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Are we going to be any wiser in 10 months time whether he can really coach or not?

We could see in 10 months if other clubs have broken down our system of play. Would have liked to see how Ratts would respond to the inevitable second year issues.


So this one factor, whether the opposition can break down our system of play, is going to determine Ratts future as coach?

That is THE factor, he needs to have enough tactics to get the team playing competitively as much as possible.

Signing him now without an opt-out clause seems hasty.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:07 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
We sound like we're gun-shy as supporters based on what's happened to us in the past with Pagan.

Must put the contract extension in perspective.

Answer these:
Do we have a different administration to that of 4 years ago?
Is our playing list better now than it was 4 years ago?
Would you trust this administration over the one we had 4 years ago?
Do we have more resources in the football department now than we did 4 years ago?

All these answers you'll find favour the coach of the day, in this case Ratten. Yes, he's been at the helm only for one full season with much better players at his disposal and younger with a lot more upside.

I don't think you could just sack a coach after a two year term, particularly in our case where we'd selected a young coach. Needs at least 3 to 4 years to see whether he can cut it. Clarkson is the classic case, even Bomber Thompson to an extent.

I think you need to give a little to get, and as stated in the article, it suggests that there are many incentives built into the contract, so I'd suggest Ratten wouldn't be getting paid anywhere near what Pagan was.

There's no doubt by end of 2010, Ratten's true performance as coach could be judged where he has had enough time to develop and coach. And by that stage, IF he wasn't performing, then paying out the final year of his contract wouldn't be anywhere near as bad as it was for Pagan.

I'm comfortable with the decision to extend.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
I doubt the sums are huge for the contract so it is all a bit of a dead argument.

If we finish next year outside the eight with no discernable excuses, i.e. injuries etc. then contract or not Ratten will be feeling the pressure just like any other coach would with our list in 2009.

The expectation next season are for finals football.

They need to be met.

This is Carlton, when you have a good list finals are expected.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:08 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
If we make the eight next year, I'd expect Ratten to be coaching us well beyond 2011.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:42 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Jarusa wrote:
I doubt the sums are huge for the contract so it is all a bit of a dead argument.



Zachary. :wink:


You dont happen to have a graph handy to illustrate the point do you. :P :wink: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:06 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:16 pm
Posts: 303
Good we resigned him.

I think one of the major reason we had such a long long run at the bottom was the quick fix scheme Pagan tried to adopt so that he can keep his job. Obviously this failed and only after that did he realise maybe development is the way to go. Showing faith in Ratts now tells him we are willing to be patient. We are willing to see your plan play out to the finish.

Obviously we want to make the finals this year and Ratts has come out and said so...but say we don't...it atleast tells him not to go rushing making stupid decisions just to keep his job, and continue with the development he has set out.

I like this decision by the club...Congrats Ratts

_________________
cruise (Kreuze) missile:
a very accurate flying bomb.
SOURCE: http://library.thinkquest.org/3785/glossary.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 10:13 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Wangers wrote:
I don't think you could just sack a coach after a two year term, particularly in our case where we'd selected a young coach. Needs at least 3 to 4 years to see whether he can cut it. Clarkson is the classic case, even Bomber Thompson to an extent.



That's right.

Unless the coach is an ubsolute disaster you give him 2, 3 or maybe 4 years to make a difference. The coach is part of the team too and he needs to grow with the rest of them.

We are just being reactionary, we are hesitant this time around because of what happened with Pagan. it is nothing like it IMO, Ratten is well liked and spoken of very highly and our administration is a fairly competant bunch.

I like the decision anyway....

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:35 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
TheBluesMuse wrote:
That's right.

Unless the coach is an ubsolute disaster you give him 2, 3 or maybe 4 years to make a difference. The coach is part of the team too and he needs to grow with the rest of them.

We are just being reactionary, we are hesitant this time around because of what happened with Pagan. it is nothing like it IMO, Ratten is well liked and spoken of very highly and our administration is a fairly competant bunch.

I like the decision anyway....

Ubsolutely

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:35 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 2920
Location: at the Bay Oval....
TheBluesMuse wrote:
Unless the coach is an absolute disaster you give him 2, 3 or maybe 4 years to make a difference. The coach is part of the team too and he needs to grow with the rest of them.

We are just being reactionary, we are hesitant this time around because of what happened with Pagan. it is nothing like it IMO, Ratten is well liked and spoken of very highly and our administration is a fairly competent bunch.

I like the decision anyway....


I agree, and think it's a great way too move forward. Have heard many footballing greats over here on radio saying Ratts will be one of the best coaches in the AFL, due his passion and knowledge of the game.

Well done Ratts and give them hell.....

_________________
Go to http://www.snoutslouts.org/ for a look at the mighty GFC...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
budzy wrote:
What would've been the harm in waiting till the mid-season break to make a decision on whether Ratts was taking us in the right direction?

They've gone unnecessarily early on this, IMO.


Firstly, how do you define the "right direction"? If you have passion and love for the club as one small factor, then Ratten is miles ahead of anyone else available now or in the short-term future. Ratten gives the players genuine belief. Not just on game day, but belief in the Carlton Football Club. Who else pre or post Pagan could have done that better than Ratten?

Sure, there's more to coaching than passion, we all know that. Trouble is, no matter how much due diligence (or not) a club puts into signing a coach, the proof is in the eating. A coach needs time to prove himself.

Premierships, as a rule, are won by clubs with stability. Stability at board level, and stability at coaching level. The board has simply ensured there's 2 more years of stability at coaching level.

Only thing is, without the benefit of hindsight, nobody knows right now if it was dumb decision or a masterstroke. I can kind of understand the gun-shy attitude many have, but in two or three years time we could just as easily be saying how great it was watching Ratten and Judd holding that cup aloft on the last Saturday in September.

If/when that happens, I spose we'll all remember what clever chums our board were for showing such foresight.

Whatever.

GO BLUES!!!

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:30 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
gerry atric wrote:
He was handed the job by two old mates in Sticks and Gleeson, was given 3 #1 draft picks and Chris Judd, and vastly improved resources, and took us to the heady heights of 11th. Wallace has a noose around his neck after the Tiges went from 16th to 10th.


Wallace did that in the 4th year of his 5 year contract. How the hell can you compare Wallace to Ratten?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 1:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
bax wrote:
Go Ratts. Very happy to have him re-sign. I thought he did a great job this year and he will be a very good coach.

To those that don't like the decision, well maybe you just don't know your footy as well as you think you do and that's all I'll say on that!!



yeah well.... its not like we havent gone up this road before....

Ratts may have had some excuses last season but this year he has none..

So thats when he should have been judged...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:21 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
camelboy wrote:
budzy wrote:
What would've been the harm in waiting till the mid-season break to make a decision on whether Ratts was taking us in the right direction?

They've gone unnecessarily early on this, IMO.


Firstly, how do you define the "right direction"? If you have passion and love for the club as one small factor, then Ratten is miles ahead of anyone else available now or in the short-term future. Ratten gives the players genuine belief. Not just on game day, but belief in the Carlton Football Club. Who else pre or post Pagan could have done that better than Ratten?

Sure, there's more to coaching than passion, we all know that. Trouble is, no matter how much due diligence (or not) a club puts into signing a coach, the proof is in the eating. A coach needs time to prove himself.

Premierships, as a rule, are won by clubs with stability. Stability at board level, and stability at coaching level. The board has simply ensured there's 2 more years of stability at coaching level.

Only thing is, without the benefit of hindsight, nobody knows right now if it was dumb decision or a masterstroke. I can kind of understand the gun-shy attitude many have, but in two or three years time we could just as easily be saying how great it was watching Ratten and Judd holding that cup aloft on the last Saturday in September.

If/when that happens, I spose we'll all remember what clever chums our board were for showing such foresight.

Whatever.

GO BLUES!!!


From now I'll define the 'right direction' as more wins than losses.

2 scenarios come the split round break...

a) we're 2 wins/9 losses.. we're still too fevcentric with a disfunctional game plan and Ratten is still unsigned, what would you be thinking?

b) we're 8 wins/3 losses.. we have a multi-pronged attack with a spread of goalkickers with a number of unheralded young players taking the next step and Ratten still unsigned, what would you be thinking?

Are both scenarios a chance of being reality?
If the answer is yes, he's been re-signed prematurely.

No harm in waiting a little longer, IMO, to digest some more before making a decision.

Did they go early to avoid potential media heat? If so, that's a bit weak.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Anyone who thinks coaches are judged on tactics or short term improvement are kidding themselves.
Talk to the current coaches and their mentors (Parkin, Alves, Connolly and co.) and they'll tell you good coaching is about quality preparation, not tricks.

The good coaches teach their players to be good decision makers. To think their way through situations whilst under enormous pressure and to react in a manner that will be predictable to their team mates and beneficial to the team. No one does it well all the time but the better teams make the right decision more than most.
That process is developed by implementation of game sense drills at training and coaches with the ability to communicate with the players without overloading them with useless bullshit.

From what I've witnessed, the players are learning more in one week of training at the moment than they did under a years training from Pagan.
The drills are game specific and give the players every opportunity to instinctively play a style of game that will lead to success.
What happens on game day reflects their long term preparation. Tactics make up 5% of wins and losses.
Games are decided by long term strategies and smart players. That's what Ratts is building. Give him time.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
What if we're 8 wins/3 losses at the break and Fev has already kicked 55 goals, with the next best, Brad Fisher on just 11?

What have we done then? Gone too early, or made the right choice?

The ability to cater for being too Fevcentric has already started. The recruitment of Mr 206cm will allow Kreuzer to spend more time out of the ruck and in the forwardline. The recruitment of Yarran has given our forward line a breath of fresh air.

Well, at least, that's theory. We just need tuition, practice and time to let the theory develop. I dare say R11 2009 will be too early to tell. ;)

I know it's warm and fuzzy stuff, but I don't think we can, or should, underestimate the passion Ratten has for the club. With passion like that starting at the top (throw in Sticks for good measure), the players can only be affected in a positive way. Ratten's alumni will bleed navy blue. That can only bring us closer to #17.

Oh, budzy, I'm not sure we can categorically say one way or the other that Ratten has been signed too early. But, it's a moot point as the decision has been made. If it turns out the wrong decision was made, I'm guessing we won't be waiting until the end of 2011 for confirmation.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
camelboy wrote:
What if we're 8 wins/3 losses at the break and Fev has already kicked 55 goals, with the next best, Brad Fisher on just 11?



Probably means that Chris Yarran has had a minor pre-season injury/mishap and is set to make his debut in Round 12. :P :wink: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:13 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
i have us winning 11 games in 09


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 4:24 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
camelboy wrote:
..Oh, budzy, I'm not sure we can categorically say one way or the other that Ratten has been signed too early..


A decision made now or a decision made mid next year ..either way it's still a judgement of whether they think Ratts is the man or not.
The only difference is that mid next year they would've had a bit more knowledge to base their judgement on..

As you say, it's done and dusted now. Let's just hope we're 8-3 :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Melvey wrote:
i have us winning 11 games in 09


That's 11 more than I thought you'd have us on... :wink:

TheBluesMuse wrote:
Unless the coach is an ubsolute disaster you give him 2, 3 or maybe 4 years to make a difference. The coach is part of the team too and he needs to grow with the rest of them.


Perfect example - Mark Thompson.

_________________
Cheap Bike Insurance
Selling Baseball Cards


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
Caro wrote:
Ratten likens his relationship with the Carlton Football Club to a love affair that has spanned close to a quarter of a century, almost one-third of his life


Ratts is 70 years old?! :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 127 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group