Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:30 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:38 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Synbad wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Keep in mind that we don't have 1, NOT 1 player in the top 25 for tackles in the comp yet we leave our best tackler, and indeed one of the best in the comp.......in the "twos" :roll: .

Is there any wonder we were smashed in the centre last week?


JR currently rates as the 5th best tackler for Carlton in 08 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman


That might be because he is staring at backsides all day long and not getting the pill himself.. and when he dies he is impotent!!!


"Yawn"

Regards Cazzesman



Yeaah thats what his selection does.... :wink:


Downunder Chick you dont remember last years trading "Pick twenty is not in the mix" do you????

This is posturing time.....

We are into Kerr in a big way....... reckon with a year in his contract we will be trading Saddington and Ackland for him????(if we trade) :lol:


Enlighten me Sailor Man.......


Stay in the darkness... i am not your shepherd....


The light's come on Sailor Man.

So what your saying is that last year, when the club publicly said that Pick 20 wasn't on the table, they were lying.

Therefore it stands to reason that Ratts saying no picks for players, he is actually lying.

God, you crack me up sometimes.

You have some good points to make generally but when you cobble them up with BS, that's when lose people to your argument.

By the by, you'd make a shocking shepherd. :-D

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3190
Location: Whistler
hmm ... how many times was the ball kicked to Fisher inside 50? 2.

How man times to Russell? 2

How many times to Fev? 16.

According to Ratts at his presser, which he clearly was not happy about.

Ratts clearly has a difficult job trying to get the boys to look for guys other than Fev. This is one factor which does not help guys like Fisher and Russell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34546
Location: The Brown Wedge
Headplant wrote:
hmm ... how many times was the ball kicked to Fisher inside 50? 2.

How man times to Russell? 2

How many times to Fev? 16.

According to Ratts at his presser, which he clearly was not happy about.

Ratts clearly has a difficult job trying to get the boys to look for guys other than Fev. This is one factor which does not help guys like Fisher and Russell.


If I was streaming through the centre and saw Fisher, JR and Fev leading for me, I reckon I'd know where I'd kick it too.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34546
Location: The Brown Wedge
Molly wrote:
The Duke said:

Quote:
I agree....Synbad's post was one of the craziest in TC history


My goodness! That's quite some achievement!!! :-D :-D :-D


A big call....but I stand by it.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:49 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:59 am
Posts: 173
Ratts clearly has a difficult job trying to get the boys to look for guys other than Fev. This is one factor which does not help guys like Fisher and Russell.

Along with the fact that both are shite set shots :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34546
Location: The Brown Wedge
kernafides wrote:
Ratts clearly has a difficult job trying to get the boys to look for guys other than Fev. This is one factor which does not help guys like Fisher and Russell.

Along with the fact that both are shite set shots :lol:


I'd still kick it to Fev if he was surrounded by the entire cast of the Beijing opening ceremony.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:58 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
The Duke wrote:
kernafides wrote:
Ratts clearly has a difficult job trying to get the boys to look for guys other than Fev. This is one factor which does not help guys like Fisher and Russell.

Along with the fact that both are shite set shots :lol:


I'd still kick it to Fev if he was surrounded by the entire cast of the Beijing opening ceremony.


What about if Josh was standing next to him? :(

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:59 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/news/h ... tml?page=2

Interesting article by Wallsy.

Don't know if this has already been posted & apologise if so, but I believe it has reference in this thread, especially when talking about the "loose man" issue in defence. Have a look at the 2nd page. Waitey is 2nd in the league behind Harley.

As I've stated before, JW is our "Harley" if you will. The problem is, we currently don't have the additional cattle that Geelong have (experience wise) to allow JW to play the role entirely, without having to revert back to "normal" defence when things go wrong.

Oh & my 2 cents on the Fev issue as mentioned above, one of the reasons alot of entries go to Fev, is because he IS a very, very good forward who, as Ratts has said before, knows how to present himself & does it so well, it is very difficult for players to ignore him. When the other fwds around him get better, or we get better fwds, the amount of times we go to Fev will lessen.

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
The Duke wrote:
Headplant wrote:
hmm ... how many times was the ball kicked to Fisher inside 50? 2.

How man times to Russell? 2

How many times to Fev? 16.

According to Ratts at his presser, which he clearly was not happy about.

Ratts clearly has a difficult job trying to get the boys to look for guys other than Fev. This is one factor which does not help guys like Fisher and Russell.


If I was streaming through the centre and saw Fisher, JR and Fev leading for me, I reckon I'd know where I'd kick it too.


If you had your way, Fev would be playing for Collingwood and Bentick and Blackwell would be our targets :wink:

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
People wonder why Russell has some 'moments' but then goes missing.

Here is a possible answer.

One of his roles is to chase the buggers who have the ball, pressure them - watch, you'll see JR chase 1 bloke, the next and the next...I have seen him go on after 5 players, applying pressure because he does chase hard. Considering some of our personnel we need a few hard chasers. Tex used to play this role and it shitted me, but he is now an offensive weapon. Can JR develop into that? - don't know, but at the moment he is playing his part in the team. When they have the ball he chases - consequently when they are on top he is usually out of position because his role is to apply pressure to the ball carrier (incidentally Eddie suffers from this too, it takes him way out of his dangerous zone) - he must do this because we have a few who do not.

When we get on top then he no longer needs to chase, now he can lead, can be in dangerous positions, now he gives us something going forward. It is no coincidence that when we are on top JR is 'suddenly' playing well.

This is not an ideal situation and, I believe, not a long term plan. But it is a current plan given our position, personnel and lack of experience. We lack a few who chase hard when we do not have the ball (and some like Browne who are kids and have not the miles to chase hard for long) and so some of our runners must carry a far bigger load.
JR is one of them and it is a reason why he, not Blackers, not AB, not Pfieff, is in the side. He can perform this role, they cannot.

As our balance improves JR will be under greater pressure to get more of the ball and be more damaging with it - that will be his next test but it is not his test at the moment and so it is unfair/unrealistic to judge him on it.

He remains in the team because he performs a necessary role - you may not agree with the role, but to want him dropped because he performs it?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:29 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Headplant wrote:
hmm ... how many times was the ball kicked to Fisher inside 50? 2.

How man times to Russell? 2

How many times to Fev? 16.
.


In defence of the players,.............. there is a damn good reason for the above!

Fisher Can't kick and Russell can't kick, handball or mark!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Big Sinner
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:29 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Currently Roos, Craig, Laidley beat him every time.


When these guys started do you think they had trouble with Sheedy, Pagan, Malthouse, Mathews and Eade.

The Song Remains the Same.

Regards Cazzesman


Matthew Knights had trouble with one of those blokes and he beats Ratten every time as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Synbad wrote:

Steve ... how are you?
Suprised you can smell crap - i thought youd be immune to the smell.. haveing it as a mainstay all the time.

Why did i post this week and not last week???

I dont post on practice sessions anymore...

Should i have come on and said "We were unbelievable last week"?Dont think so.. Port are not a measure....
If youre aiming at the stars you dont look for worms....



So let me get this right, you only care to post about Carlton when we lose?

Man I have met alot of downhill supporters who only show up when their team is playing well, but jeez I can't say I have met any that go the other way around like you :shock:

Are you still pissed that Carlton overlooked you for the head coach job?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Big Sinner
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
woof wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Currently Roos, Craig, Laidley beat him every time.


When these guys started do you think they had trouble with Sheedy, Pagan, Malthouse, Mathews and Eade.

The Song Remains the Same.

Regards Cazzesman


Matthew Knights had trouble with one of those blokes and he beats Ratten every time as well.


Yep and Ratts has Malthouse's and Eades number so what's your point.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Big Sinner
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:34 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
woof wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Currently Roos, Craig, Laidley beat him every time.


When these guys started do you think they had trouble with Sheedy, Pagan, Malthouse, Mathews and Eade.

The Song Remains the Same.

Regards Cazzesman


Matthew Knights had trouble with one of those blokes and he beats Ratten every time as well.


Gee, does he. He I was thinking Ess beat us, as in the players. Why is it every time we lose, Ratts was beaten in the coaching box?

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
It's a good question Tianacon!

And with the exception of a few players (Russell and Stevens), every time we lose it isn't because they played badly... it was because we were outcoached.

The Adelaide game is a shining example. I like Murph... but he had an absolute stinker! He couldn't get the ball, he couldn't control the ball, he couldn't pass the ball to our blokes, he got run down, I think he even missed a goal (might be wrong on that though). Anyway, come in here on Monday, and it was all Ratten's fault as he was comprehensively outcoached! Yet he had a gun midfielder who couldn't do anything right on the day. Means you're coaching with a hand behind your back.

So Murph gets absolved for a stinker (rare admittedly), and Ratts gets bashed because (in effect) guys like Murph didn't play well enough.

I thought the weekend's game was a perfect example of guys like Grigg, Browne, Kreuzer, Jamison, Hampson (to a lesser extent), and Armfield coming to the end of their first full seasons of playing football. They looked tired and worn out. Their bodies have copped a lot, and they just seemed stuffed. Remember too that this is only Gibbs' second season, and Murph has only played 1.5 seasons. That's not necessarily being outcoached, that's simply our players being tired and worn out.

In the end, yeah Ratts has made mistakes, and I am sure he made some on Sunday. But too many people absolve the players (with JR being a notable exception) and that is being disingenuous to our situation here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The Big Sinner
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Cazzesman wrote:
woof wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
Currently Roos, Craig, Laidley beat him every time.


When these guys started do you think they had trouble with Sheedy, Pagan, Malthouse, Mathews and Eade.

The Song Remains the Same.

Regards Cazzesman


Matthew Knights had trouble with one of those blokes and he beats Ratten every time as well.


Yep and Ratts has Malthouse's and Eades number so what's your point.

Regards Cazzesman


My point is that I have given you someone that has had trouble with one of those blokes, who in my opinion has an inferior list to ours and has a good coaching record against our coach.
I also believe we have a better list than Collingwood and in terms of Eade, latley which is when we played them everyone has his number.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 4:53 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
Molly wrote:
It's a good question Tianacon!

And with the exception of a few players (Russell and Stevens), every time we lose it isn't because they played badly... it was because we were outcoached.

The Adelaide game is a shining example. I like Murph... but he had an absolute stinker! He couldn't get the ball, he couldn't control the ball, he couldn't pass the ball to our blokes, he got run down, I think he even missed a goal (might be wrong on that though). Anyway, come in here on Monday, and it was all Ratten's fault as he was comprehensively outcoached! Yet he had a gun midfielder who couldn't do anything right on the day. Means you're coaching with a hand behind your back.

So Murph gets absolved for a stinker (rare admittedly), and Ratts gets bashed because (in effect) guys like Murph didn't play well enough.

I thought the weekend's game was a perfect example of guys like Grigg, Browne, Kreuzer, Jamison, Hampson (to a lesser extent), and Armfield coming to the end of their first full seasons of playing football. They looked tired and worn out. Their bodies have copped a lot, and they just seemed stuffed. Remember too that this is only Gibbs' second season, and Murph has only played 1.5 seasons. That's not necessarily being outcoached, that's simply our players being tired and worn out.

In the end, yeah Ratts has made mistakes, and I am sure he made some on Sunday. But too many people absolve the players (with JR being a notable exception) and that is being disingenuous to our situation here.


Well said Molly. Well said.

And thanks for putting all that down. Would have taken me forever to type that many words :lol:

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
DownUnderChick wrote:
Synbad wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
The Duke wrote:

Keep in mind that we don't have 1, NOT 1 player in the top 25 for tackles in the comp yet we leave our best tackler, and indeed one of the best in the comp.......in the "twos" :roll: .

Is there any wonder we were smashed in the centre last week?


JR currently rates as the 5th best tackler for Carlton in 08 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Regards Cazzesman


That might be because he is staring at backsides all day long and not getting the pill himself.. and when he dies he is impotent!!!


"Yawn"

Regards Cazzesman



Yeaah thats what his selection does.... :wink:


Downunder Chick you dont remember last years trading "Pick twenty is not in the mix" do you????

This is posturing time.....

We are into Kerr in a big way....... reckon with a year in his contract we will be trading Saddington and Ackland for him????(if we trade) :lol:


Enlighten me Sailor Man.......


Stay in the darkness... i am not your shepherd....


The light's come on Sailor Man.

So what your saying is that last year, when the club publicly said that Pick 20 wasn't on the table, they were lying.

Therefore it stands to reason that Ratts saying no picks for players, he is actually lying.

God, you crack me up sometimes.

You have some good points to make generally but when you cobble them up with BS, that's when lose people to your argument.

By the by, you'd make a shocking shepherd. :-D


The lights come on and thats all you see???? :lol:

Posturing at this point of the season/draft and what eventuates are two different things...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 5:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Steve_C7 wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Steve ... how are you?
Suprised you can smell crap - i thought youd be immune to the smell.. haveing it as a mainstay all the time.

Why did i post this week and not last week???

I dont post on practice sessions anymore...

Should i have come on and said "We were unbelievable last week"?Dont think so.. Port are not a measure....
If youre aiming at the stars you dont look for worms....



So let me get this right, you only care to post about Carlton when we lose?

Man I have met alot of downhill supporters who only show up when their team is playing well, but jeez I can't say I have met any that go the other way around like you :shock:

Are you still pissed that Carlton overlooked you for the head coach job?


I think youll find i post when we win too.... :lol:

No i dont need a job.... i have one....its time consuming as it is....

But that doesnt mean were on the right tram coaching/development wise though does it???

Like its not just me and Ratts and noone else in the whole wide world???

Is it???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dadadadada, DLC, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Mickstar and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group