Molly wrote:
It's a good question Tianacon!
And with the exception of a few players (Russell and Stevens), every time we lose it isn't because they played badly... it was because we were outcoached.
The Adelaide game is a shining example. I like Murph... but he had an absolute stinker! He couldn't get the ball, he couldn't control the ball, he couldn't pass the ball to our blokes, he got run down, I think he even missed a goal (might be wrong on that though). Anyway, come in here on Monday, and it was all Ratten's fault as he was comprehensively outcoached! Yet he had a gun midfielder who couldn't do anything right on the day. Means you're coaching with a hand behind your back.
So Murph gets absolved for a stinker (rare admittedly), and Ratts gets bashed because (in effect) guys like Murph didn't play well enough.
I thought the weekend's game was a perfect example of guys like Grigg, Browne, Kreuzer, Jamison, Hampson (to a lesser extent), and Armfield coming to the end of their first full seasons of playing football. They looked tired and worn out. Their bodies have copped a lot, and they just seemed stuffed. Remember too that this is only Gibbs' second season, and Murph has only played 1.5 seasons. That's not necessarily being outcoached, that's simply our players being tired and worn out.
In the end, yeah Ratts has made mistakes, and I am sure he made some on Sunday. But too many people absolve the players (with JR being a notable exception) and that is being disingenuous to our situation here.
Well said Molly. Well said.
And thanks for putting all that down. Would have taken me forever to type that many words
