Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jul 27, 2025 4:39 pm

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 18 of 24
  [ 476 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 24  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Indie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Doull wrote:
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
Doull wrote:
Richter is a magnificent advocate and is inclined to take cases on principle, not just in pursuit of a buck.


But surely the cab rank rule for barristers applies does it not?


CC Can you explain to me what the "cab rank rule" is?




The 'cab rank' rule meant that Barristers had to take briefs, regardless of the client, when they were next off the rank. It was a rule created to ensure people received the best possible advocacy, regardless of their financial circumstances.

Close, but not quite Doully. The rule meant that barristers had to take on a client who was willing to pay their usual fees when they weren't otherwise engaged. It wasn't meant to help poor clients - it was meant to prevent barristers turning their backs on unpopular litigants. Julian Knight, the paedophile Ferguson in Qld, Muslims accused of terrorism aren't necessarily top of the pops.

I doubt if many defendants in assault cases in the magistrates' courts could get Richter to represent them for $500 a day.
Top
 Profile  
 
Doull
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:31 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 357
Indie wrote:
Doull wrote:
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
Doull wrote:
Richter is a magnificent advocate and is inclined to take cases on principle, not just in pursuit of a buck.


But surely the cab rank rule for barristers applies does it not?


CC Can you explain to me what the "cab rank rule" is?




The 'cab rank' rule meant that Barristers had to take briefs, regardless of the client, when they were next off the rank. It was a rule created to ensure people received the best possible advocacy, regardless of their financial circumstances.

Close, but not quite Doully. The rule meant that barristers had to take on a client who was willing to pay their usual fees when they weren't otherwise engaged. It wasn't meant to help poor clients - it was meant to prevent barristers turning their backs on unpopular litigants. Julian Knight, the paedophile Ferguson in Qld, Muslims accused of terrorism aren't necessarily top of the pops.

I doubt if many defendants in assault cases in the magistrates' courts could get Richter to represent them for $500 a day.




I stand (or rather sit) corrected.
Top
 Profile  
 
true_blue3
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
now that pratt is not officially involved with the club, does this mean he is allowed to pay our players by saying they are employed at visy without that money being counted toward the salary cap?

i know it won't happen but it's just been playing on mind for a while.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total
Top
 Profile  
 
DIAMOTISM
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
true_blue3 wrote:
now that pratt is not officially involved with the club, does this mean he is allowed to pay our players by saying they are employed at visy without that money being counted toward the salary cap?

i know it won't happen but it's just been playing on mind for a while.


Judd is employed by VISY. Players in the past have been employed by VISY. This is not a problem. Exactly the same if they are employed by FOX (Lloyd), Nine (Buckley), (Essendon* Website) Hird .

You just can't give cash to players that has coem from the club and disguised as some other payment. Judd's employent at VISY is legitamate and it is setting him up with a business career after footy.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Last edited by DIAMOTISM on Sat Jul 19, 2008 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
bosman
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 5:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4337
Location: Strathmore
Indie wrote:
I doubt if many defendants in assault cases in the magistrates' courts could get Richter to represent them for $500 a day.


$500 bucks an hr more like it.


true_blue3 wrote:

now that pratt is not officially involved with the club, does this mean he is allowed to pay our players by saying they are employed at visy without that money being counted toward the salary cap?


Good point, maybe Fev can go and work there and make a few boxes and get the extra money pocket money he wants.
Top
 Profile  
 
hustla
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:20 pm
Posts: 1086
VISY

_________________
"You're not gonna believe this. The guy killed 16 czechoslovakians. He was an interior decorator."

"His house looked like shit!"
Top
 Profile  
 
yibbida
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
http://business.watoday.com.au/business/qantas-exec-jailed-on-pricefixing-charges-20080729-3ml3.html

Quote:
Qantas executive Bruce McCaffrey has been sentenced to six months in a US federal prison, although the judge deciding his fate showed the ailing 65-year-old some mercy.

The sentence was two months shorter than expected for McCaffrey's role in a global air cargo price-fixing scam. He was also fined $US20,000 ($21,000).


Who is sponsored by QANTAS? Surely bringing the game into disrepute?

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin
Top
 Profile  
 
AGRO
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:01 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24668
Location: Kaloyasena
Judge John Bates, in the US District Court in Washington DC, ruled McCaffrey deserved the lesser sentence as a reward for acting as a key prosecution witness.



We wait with bated breath for Graeme Samuel to press for jail penalties for the AMCOR stool pidgeons who assisted the ACCC with their investigations.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill
Top
 Profile  
 
murraycray
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 3:32 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6751
Location: Echuca
If the supposed class action takes effect against Visy, would Amcor also have a case to answer ?
Or does Samuel's amnesty to Amcor cover that as well ?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.
Top
 Profile  
 
mjonc
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:58 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
murraycray wrote:
If the supposed class action takes effect against Visy, would Amcor also have a case to answer ?
Or does Samuel's amnesty to Amcor cover that as well ?


I believe the class action applies to both?

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888
Top
 Profile  
 
DocSherrin III
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17252
It most definitely applies to both. Shows you how dumb Amcor actually are!
Top
 Profile  
 
spuddie
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:03 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:07 pm
Posts: 236
Fahour looks more likely as a possible replacement for Pratt, now that he seems to have missed out on the top job at NAB


http://business.theage.com.au/business/ ... -3nl6.html


Last edited by spuddie on Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
DownUnderChick
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:12 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
spuddie wrote:
Fahour looks more likely as a possible replacement forPratt, now that he seems to have missed out on the top job at NAB?


http://business.theage.com.au/business/ ... -3nl6.html


President's aren't usually unemployed when they take over the reins [except if your Eddie McChins :-D ]

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.
Top
 Profile  
 
jezzarules
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:27 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 6044
AGRO wrote:
Judge John Bates, in the US District Court in Washington DC, ruled McCaffrey deserved the lesser sentence as a reward for acting as a key prosecution witness.



We wait with bated breath for Graeme Samuel to press for jail penalties for the AMCOR stool pidgeons who assisted the ACCC with their investigations.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Amcor would use the Chewbacca defence anyway.

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░
Top
 Profile  
 
Mil Hanna
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 2:32 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
jezzarules wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Judge John Bates, in the US District Court in Washington DC, ruled McCaffrey deserved the lesser sentence as a reward for acting as a key prosecution witness.



We wait with bated breath for Graeme Samuel to press for jail penalties for the AMCOR stool pidgeons who assisted the ACCC with their investigations.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Amcor would use the Chewbacca defence anyway.



The Chewbacca defence rules!! 8)

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford
Top
 Profile  
 
JohnM
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Ahmed Fahour would, at the minute, have a LOT of ground to make up if he wants to become el presidente of our club.
Top
 Profile  
 
Headplant
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3198
Location: Whistler
JohnM wrote:
Ahmed Fahour would, at the minute, have a LOT of ground to make up if he wants to become el presidente of our club.


I'm waiting to hear him sing "Stand By Your Man" ....
Top
 Profile  
 
Crusader
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:01 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7851
Location: Bendigo
Mil Hanna wrote:
jezzarules wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Judge John Bates, in the US District Court in Washington DC, ruled McCaffrey deserved the lesser sentence as a reward for acting as a key prosecution witness.



We wait with bated breath for Graeme Samuel to press for jail penalties for the AMCOR stool pidgeons who assisted the ACCC with their investigations.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Amcor would use the Chewbacca defence anyway.



The Chewbacca defence rules!! 8)


It doesn't make sense.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.
Top
 Profile  
 
Jarusa
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:14 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Crusader wrote:
Mil Hanna wrote:
jezzarules wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Judge John Bates, in the US District Court in Washington DC, ruled McCaffrey deserved the lesser sentence as a reward for acting as a key prosecution witness.



We wait with bated breath for Graeme Samuel to press for jail penalties for the AMCOR stool pidgeons who assisted the ACCC with their investigations.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Amcor would use the Chewbacca defence anyway.



The Chewbacca defence rules!! 8)


It doesn't make sense.


Look at the silly monkey.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|
Top
 Profile  
 
chubbyruss
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2008 1:20 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8632
Pratt in bid for Amcor records

http://business.theage.com.au/business/ ... -3r6y.html

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 18 of 24
  [ 476 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 ... 24  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 17th Premiership, Google [Bot], GWS, Mickstar and 35 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group