TianaCon wrote:
mjonc wrote:
It's not how many turnovers or errors, it's the position on the ground and what it costs us on the scoreboard.
With all due respect mjonc, that's a fairly obvious comment, even for the most basic football follower, which I am not.
Also, I would have hoped that you would at least provide some reasoning as to why you think we will not make the finals, unless we stop turning the ball over as much &/or making as many mistakes, in areas of the ground that will & does hurt us on the scoreboard. If that is your view.
Considering, before you respond, the points that I have raised & the reasoning I have given for my view.
If not, that's fine too.

Great analysis TC. Just watching Hodge last week pass the ball to an opponent 4 times proves that they're all humans out there, and mistakes happen.
I agree that the level of pressure the opposition engages is going to reflect the number of clangers.
I think that mjonc is looking at our movement into the forwardline rather than the clangers as a stand alone figure.
If you consider the game gainst the Dogs or Swans, and nearly every game we played (bar Lions) we have come out and dominated only to miss opportunities from:
1. Taking shots from accute angles (degree of difficulty from our method of entry, not a clanger)
2. Missing shots from inaccurate kicking (clanger)
3. Looked for the Fev option exclusively only to see the surge stopped from a 3 on 1 advantage (not a clanger)
When we bring the ball in quicker as we did against the 'unaccountable' Doggies, and we look for options, and minimise our clangers we will all have the confidence in knowing we are heading for finals. Furthermore, we have to show this ability when playing more accountable teams, of which the Crows are (ultra defensive) and this week will determine if we have arrived or not.
In the meantime, we can only judge Carlton on their last quarter, and @#$%&! me dead, on that basis alone, we are finals bound; that's only 1 quarter though and not representative of our modus operandi for most of the season (of ups and downs from a very very young team).
Bluey44 wrote
Quote:
I admit I'm one of the guilty masses who have been very harsh on Jordan Russell - I think he is a great barometer of our young team. When players like JR stop making as many flower-ups that cancel out the good things they do, then we'll know that we've arrived.
Perhaps the kids are the real barometer given the make up of our team is mainly kids.
I think we are going to sneak in based on belief and improvement of the team all over the park (and the inclusion of Walker's strength and pace)...and if the form we have shown in the last month is an indicator as well as the draw teams above us have...the improvement implies we may even end up 5th (mathematically).
Our future is in our hands, and the Saints and Swans disappointments which incidently were the games to put us out of the race, may just provide the stimulus to seek satisfaction from playing better, rather than the disappointment from playing stop start and not playing bold fast moving footy.
Take the punt boys, roll the dice and attack; it's the best form of defense.
We've got nothing to lose; a beautiful place to be.