MIL wrote:
Reckon Fisher was a big pro yesterday. Yep, he can't kick 'em from more than 40m. But when he was the goto man (as Ratts said), rather than Fev, he kicked a goal and offered a good option across half fwd (the pick up was classy too).
Until we recruit another Richard Dennis or Matt Clape, and until Jake matures, he's the best we've got. And he played well yesterday.
True. But i'm upset cause Fisher IS better than what he has given this year. Fisher is an awesome forward option.....
But let's face facts.......
Fact #1. Fisher is a Forward
Fact #2. Fowards are paid to kick goals.
Fact #3. fisher has kicked just 14 goals this year. That's a goal a game. Is that good enough from a forward?
He is a great mark, one of the best we have (even more so than Fev). But he needs to lift.
He was not in our best yesterday and it aggrivates me reading the paper this morning to see he got votes whereas players like Gibbs / Wiggens / Bentick etc etc etc miss out?
Anyway. I will agree that it was Fishers best game in about 2-3 weeks but it's still nowhere near what i would consider a great game worthy enough of earning bloody votes.
Yes, each player can have their off days and they are all human after all and it's easy for me to sit behind a computer and say "They should do this and they should do that" etc etc etc.........I love Fisher, i really do. But 14 possessions, 3 clangers, 53% efficiency and 2 goals (one from a gimmie) doesn't really yell out to me "Great Game".
p.s. YES. I was at the game.