Synbad wrote:
Let me ask you this...
Did they run harder???
Did the forward line open up???
Did they attack with purpose?
Did they work for each other?
Was the forward line structure better?
Did they block and shepherd for anyone?
How was their overall game benefitted from hiding for 6 minutes DUC????
What part of their football improved and developed???
Did they look threatening?????

It's obvious you haven't read posts in this thread - only the ones pertaining to you and you've responded accordingly.
The benefits of tempo football have been pointed out and explained by a number of posters already. If you don't know what I mean go back to the start amd read through the whole thread again...
But to humour you I'll answer your above quesitons.
Did they run harder???You need to run a lot harder to lose your man and take an uncontested possession, than your normal attacking drive. If the ball is kicked to a contested situation it's effectively not tempo football.
Did the forward line open up???It isn't always an attacking move, we were chipping around the forward line, that would be self-defeating. We managed to get it to the forward line once or twice, without too much risk of turnover.
Did they attack with purpose?Once again, this isn't an attacking tactic.
Did they work for each other?Work as in what? You usually don't lay shepherds with this style of football. Basically, it is uncontested mark, kick to an uncontested mark.
The work is in finding space, and making sure the kick hits the target.
Was the forward line structure better?We got a goal out of it, right? The forward structure is no different whether we play tempo football or not...
Did they block and shepherd for anyone?See above.
How was their overall game benefitted from hiding for 6 minutes DUC????We stopped their run of goals and scored one for ourselves. In 6 or so minutes. Beats the hell out of Geelong kicking another couple and going into 1/2 time 6-8 goals down.
What part of their football improved and developed???If they can play tempo football correctly, they have definitely improved in both skill and fitness. It's not easy to make room to uncontested marks, then hit the next guy in the chest, repeat, repeat.
Did they look threatening?????Not at that time, but hey - we could have played the attacking shootout football you obviously crave, and end up losing 18 goals to 30 goals.
It didn't work against Essendon*, why on Earth would it work against Geelong?!?!
Sparky......
im asking if they learnt how to block for judd or the ball carrier....
.. or had a kick out strategy...
or linked up to the forward line....
what was the POINT of wasting six minutes apart from wasting six minutes because you cant do the basics
i said i want to see structures on the field so that players understand a role as a combination .........
things like kick outs... set plays... blocks and protecting the ball carrier... talk.... opening up a defence... etc.....
... and if you cannot do any of those things properly... you can tempo footy till the cows come home .. and so flower what?????