Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 12:42 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I see Brad Fisher laid 0 tackles


Given the surgery on his hand, that would be perfectly understandable.


bullocks!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:12 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Scotland and Houlahan will both play 22 games this year barring injury and both will be in the top 10 in the B&F.
Again.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:48 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10613
Rhys26 wrote:
2 reasons from Saturdays game why Heath Scotland might need to have a good think about things while playing for the bullants:

- The horrible free kick he gave away at the start of the game. Weak as piss
- The insipid effort not to take out Lovett by not putting on a block which resulted in Lovett to run on and kick a goal.

2 soft goals given away by a player who is supposedly a leader.


Has been doing it for years. :cry:
Uncontested possessions he may get :roll: but his direct and even in-direct opponents (anyone within 1 foot of him) have continuously hurt us in the past. We cannot get any worse right now so give his position to Pfeiffer and move him out .... next :twisted:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34548
Location: The Brown Wedge
The problem with both these guys is they're too slow for the modern game. We can use one of them on the field at any one time, but not 2.

Ideally we'd have Grigg/Anderson/Benji in the department of defence. Much faster stronger (when developed) and bigger tanks.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:30 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
The Duke wrote:
The problem with both these guys is they're too slow for the modern game. We can use one of them on the field at any one time, but not 2.

Ideally we'd have Grigg/Anderson/Benji in the department of defence. Much faster stronger (when developed) and bigger tanks.


Exactly. Push Houlihan forward, push Scotland out the door, and bring in Joey & Armfield.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Both are useless defensive options. Do not have any defensive skills whatsoever.

They both have barely passable defensive skills, but its their skill by foot that sees them at half-back currently. This will change over time with players like Browne and Walker coming into or returning to the side. It also adds pressure to their positions in such a quality midfield.

Quote:
Houlihan at best is an intechange forward option only because he is skilled around goals. Should never ever ever ever be played further up the ground than the Fwd pocket.

That is ridiculous... he is a natural wingman and attacking flanker. Have the last four years of him hitting blokes on the lead slipped your mind?

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
My problem with both is that when they're out there they seem to be playing their own game. Clearly I'm not privy to the game plan each week, but they rarely seem to be involved in assists or helping out their team mates - they get a lot of uncontested ball hanging out the back, dispose of the ball (usually fairly well) and then seem to think their job is done.

I'm not usually one to call for people's heads at the selection table each week - but I am of the opinion the MC should seriously be evaluating the ceiling of these two players vs the ceiling of Browne, Grigg etc and weighing up who's going to offer more in the long term, and who's going to buy into the game plan we have now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:38 pm 
Offline
formerly p(12)terg
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:46 pm
Posts: 7012
Location: Western Sydney, NSW.au
maxyblue wrote:
could either of the two, along with Ackland, stand up among their peers and say they've been honest in their endeavours? would they be believed if they did? in a team sport that's the question, can you get up in front of your peers and say that you had an honest, red-hot crack?
The fact that they haven't even considered Ackland, even when he was ready, answers this question, for mine


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
[mod]

Just a reminder to all that threats of physical violence and homophobic comments are not welcome on this site.

:evil:

[/mod]




When we can afford to play Houlihan as a luxury in the forward line, we'll know we're fielding a strong side.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:31 am
Posts: 107
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I see Brad Fisher laid 0 tackles


Given the surgery on his hand, that would be perfectly understandable.


bullocks!!


I understand that Fisher is coming back from injury & needs to gain some match fitness, but Saturday night was the worst game I've seen from him.

When the game was ther for the winning, Fisher was persisted with, when i thought he was the obvious change to be made.

Judd was being tagged out of the game...why didn't he get a spell up forward, then re-shuffle the midfield to get some ball down there?

Anyway, they'll all be better for the experience when they take on the pies this week & give us that long awaited win.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:24 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I see Brad Fisher laid 0 tackles


Given the surgery on his hand, that would be perfectly understandable.


bullocks!!


Ever played AFL footy after a hand injury Melvin?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:48 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Scotto will fire up against his old mob.. :twisted:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I see Brad Fisher laid 0 tackles


Given the surgery on his hand, that would be perfectly understandable.


bullocks!!


A moo point?

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:51 am
Posts: 442
What's with everyone jumping on Fisher all of a sudden?
He kicked 40+ goals last year - he could get a game in any side in the comp.
All of a sudden we think we can do without him! :shock:
Give the guy a break! :roll:

_________________
Cleanliness is next to Juddliness!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:17 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
4everBlue wrote:
What's with everyone jumping on Fisher after just one game?
He kicked 40+ goals last year - he could get a game in any side in the comp.
All of a sudden we think we can do without him! :shock:
Give the guy a break! :roll:


It's called cannibalism.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Wojee wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I see Brad Fisher laid 0 tackles


Given the surgery on his hand, that would be perfectly understandable.


bullocks!!


A moo point?


:lol:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:23 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
The Duke wrote:
The problem with both these guys is they're too slow for the modern game. We can use one of them on the field at any one time, but not 2.

Ideally we'd have Grigg/Anderson/Benji in the department of defence. Much faster stronger (when
developed) and bigger tanks.


I agree. The problem is not Scotland and Houlihan. They are both clearly in our best 22 and Scotland has just about been in our best 3 for 4 years. However, the Scotland, Houlihan, Carazzo combination are not quick or defensive enough back up for Judd,Stevens, Gibbs & Murphy. I put a lot of the blame on Ratten over the last few weeks for picking Bannister who has no future despite playing ok, instead of developing Grigg, Jackson or Andersen. One of them at least should be in the 22 and given a permanent development run with role so they can take the position of Scotland, Houlihan and Carazzo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:37 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
Melvey wrote:
I see Brad Fisher laid 0 tackles


Given the surgery on his hand, that would be perfectly understandable.


bullocks!!


Ever played AFL footy after a hand injury Melvin?


No, never played AFL. I did play in the EDFL, tore my ACL last year. My footy days are done with.

Opposition teams use a running player on him. Even worse according to you he has a hand injury and can't tackle nor can he chase. Why play him then??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:03 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:23 pm
Posts: 210
Location: TC>TBV
budzy wrote:
Scotto will fire up against his old mob.. :twisted:


agreed.......back to form

:twisted:

_________________
All at Carlton are Equal, Except some are More Equal than others


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
Michael Jezz wrote:
The Duke wrote:
The problem with both these guys is they're too slow for the modern game. We can use one of them on the field at any one time, but not 2.

Ideally we'd have Grigg/Anderson/Benji in the department of defence. Much faster stronger (when
developed) and bigger tanks.


I agree. The problem is not Scotland and Houlihan. They are both clearly in our best 22 and Scotland has just about been in our best 3 for 4 years. However, the Scotland, Houlihan, Carazzo combination are not quick or defensive enough back up for Judd,Stevens, Gibbs & Murphy. I put a lot of the blame on Ratten over the last few weeks for picking Bannister who has no future despite playing ok, instead of developing Grigg, Jackson or Andersen. One of them at least should be in the 22 and given a permanent development run with role so they can take the position of Scotland, Houlihan and Carazzo


Thirded. I looked at Andrew Lovett burning up and down the G the other night and all I was thinking was where the hell is Benji?? Why isn't he being played?

I don't care if he's not ready. Lovett wasn't ready when he started. He used to spray kicks all over the shop. Sheeds didn't care, he just told him to go out there and run fast. Break the lines. Excite the fans and make the opposition nervous. And now a few seasons later, he's a genuinely dangerous player cause he's starting to finish well at the end of those breathtaking runs.

I'd be trying to develop one of our genuinely quick players in the team. Put him in and tell he you're not dropping him all season so he should back himself. Seems to work for Hawks and Pies. What our problem?


Last edited by nightcrawler on Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CarltonComeback, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 48 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group