Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 7:29 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 2:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
nytdog wrote:
Surprises me that a lot of posters don't see the value Eddie adds to the team... Match winning abilities, ability to turn a game, forward line pressure that no one else in the team provides, ability to rotate through the midfield with effectiveness, mercurial (not many others in the team have that). Eddie is a must until we have someone better than him at what he does - which we dont right now.


I agree he has many of those qualities you listed but he doesnt produce them often enough for my liking and it comes to a point when you have to look at other options......it may help Eddie to become more consistent if he sees others challenging for his position.

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
SurreyBlue wrote:
Pfeffier Jamison Bower
Walker Thornton Scotland
Houlihan Carrazzo Simpson
Gibbs Waite Fisher
Kruezer Fevola Murphy
Cloke Judd Stevens
Hampson Hadley Betts Jackson

Give me this team and I'll show you finals! :-D 8)

ps. Your team is close Brizzy but not as good as mine, but bloody close. :P

Setanta will play every game this year if available. He's better already than Bower IMVHFO, so if you ask me who he could replace, that's my answer. Also, Fisher can't play for weeks so why select him?

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10613
Blue Sombrero wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Pfeffier Jamison Bower
Walker Thornton Scotland
Houlihan Carrazzo Simpson
Gibbs Waite Fisher
Kruezer Fevola Murphy
Cloke Judd Stevens
Hampson Hadley Betts Jackson

Give me this team and I'll show you finals! :-D 8)

ps. Your team is close Brizzy but not as good as mine, but bloody close. :P

Setanta will play every game this year if available. He's better already than Bower IMVHFO, so if you ask me who he could replace, that's my answer. Also, Fisher can't play for weeks so why select him?


Mate, This was supposed to be the best side we felt for 2008, not just round 1.

On the Setanta vs Bower ... everyone has their preference.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:40 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7698
Location: Bendigo
keogh wrote:
shocking post

The guy does not panic. The number of times he was tackled and his strength forced two or three opposing players towards him and he found a teammate free was gold....

To say Carrazzo succumbs to pressure is one of the most stupid comments I have ever read on this website.


Wasn't suggesting that he panics when the pressure is on - I was suggesting that if he gets the ball metres in the clear with nobody within sight of him or the bloke he is about to deliver the ball to, his disposal gives the opposition a chance to make a contest.

'Succumb' - maybe not the best word that fits here. I didn't want to say 'creates' but it is a better fit.

I would still have him on the fringe - a long way ahead of Eddie Betts. A little bit over the little guy. He has plenty of ability and is a bit of an enigma, but consistency is where it counts.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:37 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:20 pm
Posts: 1086
Carazzo will rotate in most midfields in the AFL. Someone who could find the pill so often with alot of pressure around is always a required player. So long as he gets rid of those hospital handballs.

_________________
"You're not gonna believe this. The guy killed 16 czechoslovakians. He was an interior decorator."

"His house looked like shit!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25443
Location: Bondi Beach
Great thread as usual BB, and a very good looking team too.

I have no doubt that we have improved in the area of depth, especially in the midfield with the Judd, Stevens, Hadley and Pfieffer available in 2008 as well as the natural progression of the kids on our list.

Quote:
Backs:.............Grigg (3-6).............Jamieson (2)........S O’hAilpin (2)

HBacks:...........Walker (3-6)..........Thornton (2)........Scotland (3-6)

Centre:............Simpson (6)............Gibbs (6).............Stevens (6)

HForw:............Fisher (4)................Waite (4)............Houlihan (5-6)

Forw:..............Hadley (5-6)............Fevola (4)...........Kreuzer (4-1)

Follow:............Hampson (1-4).......Judd (6)..............Murphy (6)


Interc:.............Bentick (6)..............Bower (2)...........Cloke (1)........Betts (5)


Emerg: ...........Anderson (3)...........Hartlett (4) .........Pfeiffer (3-6)


Whilst there is good reason to pick and persevere with Grigg as a BP, I think if we were to llok for a player ready for the BP and not developing then Carrazzo would take that position. I wouldn't waste Carrazzo in that position as I believe like Grigg, Anderson, Pfieffer and maybe Armfield can put their hands up for the same reason.

I have a strong belief, and based on what I saw of Aisake last year that he will make it, and is also worth persevering in 2008 for the sake of development if 2008 is the year of development. If that's the case then I would have him ahead of Cloke on the grounds of potential, extra genuine ruck height and speed. I also believe we have added depth in the ruck and will not rely on Ackland.

Jacobs is an interesting one. If Cloke is to make it. I mean make it for the next few years then I'd suggest it would be CHF. There is no way he will stay ahead of the kids based on strength and experience. I too prefer Waite at CHF, and with Fish next to him and Kreuzer in a FP, I can't see how Hartlett or Cloke are going to break into this team (injury maybe?).

Bower on the IC is a good idea as he could relieve Walker to play in the guts if necessary. I love that kid and he's only 20.

Betts is a match winner? How many games has he won for us? His 5 goals in the second half last year against the Demons was in a losing game; kicked 3 when it was all over. I like him, but he's no match winner. Last week's effort was the final straw for me. No more sticking up for Betts until he proves himself.

Carrots is miles ahead of Betts for the simple fact that he will get the ball from the opposition, or position himself to receive the ball moreso than Betts will or has ever done. I'd rather have a bloke who has the ball in a team game than one who doesn't; regardless of potential. Simple. Carrots is a great offensive tagger too!!! A very rare and special quality.

This is where the debate starts:

Quote:
5:...Chris Judd (6)

24: Nick Stevens (6)

1:...Andrew Walker (3-6)

4:...Bryce Gibbs (6)

6:...Kade Simpson (6)

3:...Marc Murphy (6)

10: Richard Hadley (6-5)

29: Heath Scotland (3-6)

33: Ryan Houlihan (5-6)

16: Shaun Grigg (3-6)

7:...Adam Bentick (6)

36: Darren Pfeiffer (6)

44: Andrew Carrazzo (6)

38: Ryan Jackson (6)


That list is BB's opinion and not gospel. It's how BB sees it, and good on him for aruing the point. I would argue that Carrots has shown more than Murphy in 2007 and so far in 2008. Yes I know there's an age difference, but regardless of age, Carrots is ahead imo. I like strong bodies in the middle and Carrots has that. I would place Carrazzo somewhere between Stevens and Houlihan on BB's list.

I can't see how Pfieffer (at Carlton for 5 minutes and 3 practise games) can rate higher than Carrazzo. Ratten will choose Carrots ahead of Pfieffer throughout the year imo.

I'm a Bentick fan, I love the kid, but I would have Carrots in there ahead of him too.

It's great to have improvement in depth. We will need it when injuries take their toll.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 3:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
o'hailpin jamison

scotland waite bower

simpson stevens gibbs

kreuzer hadley

fevola

hampson judd murphy

carrazzo houla armfield grigg

without fish we lack a chf [even when he is playing he is not tall enough to play chf]maybe hartlett or ewards?both have yet to prove.
we really need a chf, also a quick goal sneak [aaron davey type], fevola really needs a hand or two.
i think we lack up back and i think most would agree. i dont know if its a tall or a small rebounder type that we need.[anderson or austin?]
i still believe we have three or four spots left to fill. our midfield and wings are find, but its one or two up back and forward that we struggle.
what do you think?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:27 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 629
BrizzyBlue wrote:
Thanks guys for your kind thoughts. For those of you who push the Carrots barrow, have you had a serious look at our midfield rotation possibilities? This the order that I regard them in at the moment.


5:...Chris Judd (6)

24: Nick Stevens (6)

1:...Andrew Walker (3-6)

4:...Bryce Gibbs (6)

6:...Kade Simpson (6)

3:...Marc Murphy (6)

10: Richard Hadley (6-5)

29: Heath Scotland (3-6)

33: Ryan Houlihan (5-6)

16: Shaun Grigg (3-6)

7:...Adam Bentick (6)

36: Darren Pfeiffer (6)

44: Andrew Carrazzo (6)

38: Ryan Jackson (6)

2:...Jordan Russell (6)

13: Luke Blackwell (6)

46: David Ellard (R) (5-6)

20: Clinton Benjamin (3)

45: Aaron Joseph (R) (6)


If you don't agree with the order, consider this:

Carrots couldn't push any of these guys from this centre line out of the team. Simpson (6) Gibbs (6) Stevens (6)

He seriously couldn't push either of these guys from the centre square. Judd (6) Murphy (6)

A small possibility on replacing young Grigga in the back pocket, but Shauns composure, marking ability and accurate passing gets him the nod over other hopefuls. No chance of doing what Walks is capable of and Bagpipes is probably a better sweeper than Skinny was. 3 very reliable defenders which will all push forward during the season Grigg (3-6) Walker (3-6) Scotland (3-6)

We need utility type players who can be moved around like chess pieces to do a job required for the team. Houlihan (5-6)can play back forward and even have a run on the ball. I still think he is an outside reciever, however his disposal is second to none in this squad. Those couple of bullet like passes on Saturday night were sublime. Hadley (5-6) played in the Lions last premiership side as Mr. Everywhere. He also can plug holes. He reads the play very well. He can do the defensive sweeping role, he is a goal kicker and most importantly he is an inside blocker and feeder. Just what Judd needs.

Interchange: Bentick (6) Now this is where most people see Carrots fitting in the role that AB has filled for the past few seasons. AB is unique in the number of tackles he gets through in a game (not wavy wavy arms stuff, like a few we got) as well as the number of times he is first to the pill at the stoppages. Just look at the AFL season stats. His hand disposal is as good as any. Carrots has not demonstrated that he can play this role let alone challenge AB for it. Think back 3 weeks before AB was injured and didn't play in the SA game or since. We had a trial at PP. It only went for an hour or so, but was pretty serious as the boys were all trying to impress the MC to get a berth in the Freo game. AB got over 30 possies and was adjudged BOG.

Emergency: Pfeiffer (3-6) The young croweater could just be the steal of the summer. Aside from getting run off his feet against the Dawks, he did superbly against Port and Freo. Once again his size, speed, flexibility and accuracy puts him slightly ahead of other aspirants.

If you can fit Andy Carrazzo into our best 25, tell me who he replaces and why. Don't just write a critique of my post and say he won the Club B&F, so must be in the side. Teaguey, McKernan and Whittas all fell away after winning it. I think Carrots is made of sterner stuff and is a fitness nut, but we are developing a bunch of kids who are following the lead set by Andy Walks, the Irish boys and now Juddy wjhen it comes to gut busting running. In the end it will be about skills. Unfortunately Carrots can't kick accurately even when not under pressure and some of his hospital handballs just will not cut it at the elite level. He gets plenty of the red thing on the fringe of packs and often gets away from his man (although rarely tagged), but just doesn't hurt the opposition; cause he turns it over too many times.


Great post BrizzyBlue. I'm with you 100%. Would love to see Carrots in the team, but I think with injuries he would be next in. I think you're right and he, grigg and betts (I like him, just doesn't quite do enough) will be fighting for the spot. Good work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:32 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: perth
keogh wrote:
Crusader wrote:
keogh wrote:
Anyone who doesnt think that carrots isnt in our best 22 go and get a copy of the win against the Bulldogs last year.
The guy has his faults but he would get a game in any team. Plain fact.


Tries his heart out - tick
Runs all day - tick
Gets his hands on the pill - tick

Can't kick for shit.... so unless your suggested role is as a tagger - who dispossesses opponents or beats them to the ball and taps it along the ground until one of his teammates picks it up - that suggestion is more f*cked than fact.

Not that plenty of players haven't gotten a game playing that role... FACT is that he's a liability when he has the footy - even when he does hit a target, it usually takes away the advantage upfield. The number of times I have seen him (as well as a few other players in our side) float a little drop-punt to a running player who has to STOP.... its hard to watch.

Pressure is the number one thing that is interesting to watch in this game these days - great players make it look like there is none, good players battle through it, Carrots succumbs to it. He would make one of THE BEST run-with players in the league and when you're a side as ordinary as we have been, that counts...


shocking post

Did you go to any games last year?
His kicking is better than it has been. He is not the best kick and never will be but everyone forgets the positives.
The guy does not panic. The number of times he was tackled and his strength forced two or three opposing players towards him and he found a teammate free was gold.
I could name 40 players before given Carrazzo a serve. He is a dam fine player. To say Carrazzo succumbs to pressure is one of the most stupid comments I have ever read on this website.
Carrazzo isnt a Agrade mid fielder but he is not far off it. If it wasnt for him we would have lost to the Bulldogs in that game.

And unlike Waite, Bower, Murphy and anyone else on our list who are shit kicks Carrazzo has improved in this skill area from a few years ago.

Its unbelievable that someone would post a topic on trading this guy as I have noticed.
Get off the guys back.


He may have had the yips in these first few practice games, but murph is certainly no sh!t kick - in fact I would rate him as one of our best in foot disposal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
what we have to remember people is the obvious!!
we have 22 spots and we can only fill 15 of them.
thats right and thats the reality!!!!!
no bentick, banno, saddington, betts, wiggins, thornton, Ackland and carrazzo is a ?
russell, grigg, bower, hartlett, ewards and jackson are still to impress.
no fevola no forward line. week in week out we have the most score kicked against us.
we lack a small forward who kicks goals and applys forward line pressure, we need a chf, we need a hard defender.
hammer will grow but will struggle if not well supported.[cloke is not the answer].
plain and simple, if you disagree please tell me which club would pick up and of the above names[hawthorn can have thornton, makes far too many errors].


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:26 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
I'd be thinking about Jacobs as the other rookie who is allowed to play like Jamison.
The Hawks highlighted an ongoing weak area in our team and that is rucking especially at the centre bounce.
Hampson needs genuine assistance and while I admire Clokes work around the ground and his work ethic he is too small vs giants like Campbell and Taylor. Not much point having great mids if they dont get first use of the footy and are chasing tail...

While Jacobs isnt athletic he is awkward with good size and would prevent other ruckman dominating at ruck contests..
I wouldnt run with Jacobs perhaps in every game but if Hampson does go down for whateva reason or has a bad game we need a proper backup.

I'm not so keen to throw Kruezer into the ruck and have him knocked around and feel he is better part time ruck /ruck partime forward....


Yep, keep McKreuzerhan away from too much centre square rucking his year. Too underdeveloped for it at the moment.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
blueboy23 wrote:
what we have to remember people is the obvious!!
we have 22 spots and we can only fill 15 of them.
thats right and thats the reality!!!!!
no bentick, banno, saddington, betts, wiggins, thornton, Ackland and carrazzo is a ?
russell, grigg, bower, hartlett, ewards and jackson are still to impress.
no fevola no forward line. week in week out we have the most score kicked against us.
we lack a small forward who kicks goals and applys forward line pressure, we need a chf, we need a hard defender.
hammer will grow but will struggle if not well supported.[cloke is not the answer].
plain and simple, if you disagree please tell me which club would pick up and of the above names[hawthorn can have thornton, makes far too many errors].


The competition doesn't work like that. No team has the best players in each category, it's the strength of the team as a whole thats more important. Sure there are players that won't find a home in other teams, but that is the same on every list, simply the salary and draft doesn't allow for it.
We haven't developed our players and so it is too early to call the chop on some of them, lets ride out the years and get 30+ games into some of these guys; then and only then can you make a call on whether they will make it or not.
FWIW I believe that any team has 6 blokes or so that wouldn't find a spot in another team it's how the other 16+ players performs that either exposes them or hides them.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Steve_C7 wrote:
blueboy23 wrote:
what we have to remember people is the obvious!!
we have 22 spots and we can only fill 15 of them.
thats right and thats the reality!!!!!
no bentick, banno, saddington, betts, wiggins, thornton, Ackland and carrazzo is a ?
russell, grigg, bower, hartlett, ewards and jackson are still to impress.
no fevola no forward line. week in week out we have the most score kicked against us.
we lack a small forward who kicks goals and applys forward line pressure, we need a chf, we need a hard defender.
hammer will grow but will struggle if not well supported.[cloke is not the answer].
plain and simple, if you disagree please tell me which club would pick up and of the above names[hawthorn can have thornton, makes far too many errors].


The competition doesn't work like that. No team has the best players in each category, it's the strength of the team as a whole thats more important. Sure there are players that won't find a home in other teams, but that is the same on every list, simply the salary and draft doesn't allow for it.
We haven't developed our players and so it is too early to call the chop on some of them, lets ride out the years and get 30+ games into some of these guys; then and only then can you make a call on whether they will make it or not.
FWIW I believe that any team has 6 blokes or so that wouldn't find a spot in another team it's how the other 16+ players performs that either exposes them or hides them.....


Not sure many of ours would get a game at Geelong in the ones......
Judd and Fev aside we wouldnt have any other automatics....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:50 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
With most sporting teams the cream can pretty much cancel each other out. It is the second and third tier players that make the difference.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
[quote="BrizzyBlue"]Thanks guys for your kind thoughts. For those of you who push the Carrots barrow, have you had a serious look at our midfield rotation possibilities? This the order that I regard them in at the moment.


5:...Chris Judd (6)

24: Nick Stevens (6)

1:...Andrew Walker (3-6)

4:...Bryce Gibbs (6)

6:...Kade Simpson (6)

3:...Marc Murphy (6)

10: Richard Hadley (6-5)

29: Heath Scotland (3-6)

33: Ryan Houlihan (5-6)

16: Shaun Grigg (3-6)

7:...Adam Bentick (6)

36: Darren Pfeiffer (6)

44: Andrew Carrazzo (6)

38: Ryan Jackson (6)

2:...Jordan Russell (6)

13: Luke Blackwell (6)

46: David Ellard (R) (5-6)

20: Clinton Benjamin (3)

45: Aaron Joseph (R) (6)
quote]

i'd have the below as the only direct competition for carrots position.
5:...Chris Judd (6) extracter

3:...Marc Murphy (6) exctracter

10: Richard Hadley (6-5) exctracte

7:...Adam Bentick (6) exctracter

36: Darren Pfeiffer (6) exctracter

13: Luke Blackwell (6) exctracter

and at this stage i'd probably have him ahead of all excpet for judd and on par with murphy.

bentick i love but has even bigger problems than carrots.
pfeiffer is unproven but looks promising and hadley hasn't proven himself with us just yet. either of these two could put pressure on, but the rest i doubt.

gibbs will play a different role i'd imagine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
elwood blues1 spot on mate.

steve c7, how many games has bannister played? too many, why did he get delisted from Essendon*? no good!!! bentick, saddington and wiggins have had ample time to prove themselfs so its time to go.
list 6 guys from the swans, cats, eagles, saints and the pies that would struggle like the guys above!!!!
if i performed that bad over four or five years at my job have a guess what would happen.
i hope that blokes like ewards, austin, anderson, armfield, browne and pfieffer all play before the guys above.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:28 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 322
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
you have got to be kidding me, Carrazzo is in our top 22, he gets a heap of the ball and when he does he finds himself in space WHICH HE CREATES. his one of our only accountable midfielders, his willing to push back into the gaps when the opposition has the ball. i agree his kicking isnt great but it isnt the worst.
Carrazzo is a star.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group