Great thread as usual BB, and a very good looking team too.
I have no doubt that we have improved in the area of depth, especially in the midfield with the Judd, Stevens, Hadley and Pfieffer available in 2008 as well as the natural progression of the kids on our list.
Quote:
Backs:.............Grigg (3-6).............Jamieson (2)........S O’hAilpin (2)
HBacks:...........Walker (3-6)..........Thornton (2)........Scotland (3-6)
Centre:............Simpson (6)............Gibbs (6).............Stevens (6)
HForw:............Fisher (4)................Waite (4)............Houlihan (5-6)
Forw:..............Hadley (5-6)............Fevola (4)...........Kreuzer (4-1)
Follow:............Hampson (1-4).......Judd (6)..............Murphy (6)
Interc:.............Bentick (6)..............Bower (2)...........Cloke (1)........Betts (5)
Emerg: ...........Anderson (3)...........Hartlett (4) .........Pfeiffer (3-6)
Whilst there is good reason to pick and persevere with Grigg as a BP, I think if we were to llok for a player ready for the BP and not developing then Carrazzo would take that position. I wouldn't waste Carrazzo in that position as I believe like Grigg, Anderson, Pfieffer and maybe Armfield can put their hands up for the same reason.
I have a strong belief, and based on what I saw of Aisake last year that he will make it, and is also worth persevering in 2008 for the sake of development if 2008 is the year of development. If that's the case then I would have him ahead of Cloke on the grounds of potential, extra genuine ruck height and speed. I also believe we have added depth in the ruck and will not rely on Ackland.
Jacobs is an interesting one. If Cloke is to make it. I mean make it for the next few years then I'd suggest it would be CHF. There is no way he will stay ahead of the kids based on strength and experience. I too prefer Waite at CHF, and with Fish next to him and Kreuzer in a FP, I can't see how Hartlett or Cloke are going to break into this team (injury maybe?).
Bower on the IC is a good idea as he could relieve Walker to play in the guts if necessary. I love that kid and he's only 20.
Betts is a match winner? How many games has he won for us? His 5 goals in the second half last year against the Demons was in a losing game; kicked 3 when it was all over. I like him, but he's no match winner. Last week's effort was the final straw for me. No more sticking up for Betts until he proves himself.
Carrots is miles ahead of Betts for the simple fact that he will get the ball from the opposition, or position himself to receive the ball moreso than Betts will or has ever done. I'd rather have a bloke who has the ball in a team game than one who doesn't; regardless of potential. Simple. Carrots is a great offensive tagger too!!! A very rare and special quality.
This is where the debate starts:
Quote:
5:...Chris Judd (6)
24: Nick Stevens (6)
1:...Andrew Walker (3-6)
4:...Bryce Gibbs (6)
6:...Kade Simpson (6)
3:...Marc Murphy (6)
10: Richard Hadley (6-5)
29: Heath Scotland (3-6)
33: Ryan Houlihan (5-6)
16: Shaun Grigg (3-6)
7:...Adam Bentick (6)
36: Darren Pfeiffer (6)
44: Andrew Carrazzo (6)
38: Ryan Jackson (6)
That list is BB's opinion and not gospel. It's how BB sees it, and good on him for aruing the point. I would argue that Carrots has shown more than Murphy in 2007 and so far in 2008. Yes I know there's an age difference, but regardless of age, Carrots is ahead imo. I like strong bodies in the middle and Carrots has that. I would place Carrazzo somewhere between Stevens and Houlihan on BB's list.
I can't see how Pfieffer (at Carlton for 5 minutes and 3 practise games) can rate higher than Carrazzo. Ratten will choose Carrots ahead of Pfieffer throughout the year imo.
I'm a Bentick fan, I love the kid, but I would have Carrots in there ahead of him too.
It's great to have improvement in depth. We will need it when injuries take their toll.