Polar Eyes wrote:
Blues Clues wrote:
In a business context, what he did was very wrong and he copped his fair wack.
BUT, as wrong as it was, it does not bring the game of AFL football into "disrepute".
am curious as to why you think it doesn't. wouldn't you want a man who is beyond reproach as your president?
his 'fair whack' is equivalent to about a $500 fine for you or i.
anyway, irrespective of whether he stays or goes pratt has restrengthened the club as promised so his work is essentially done.
Yes Polar, you would like them as credible and as decent as possible, but if you start setting the bar so high, the pool of AFL Presidents would be very shallow indeed. AFL Presidents are there because they are, primarily, successful in business. Business at the pointy end is a robust caper, so Mother Theresa need not apply. Really, think it through, how many current AFL Presidents are complete business "cleanskins"? Frank Costa is a decent family man, but would eat his young to get another box of Vegies on the truck....
He copped his fair wack as it was a record, and appropriate, penalty - penalties aren't based on "capacity to pay" or a % of net wealth. You don't need to be a Senior Counsel to know that.
If he diddled the Club, ripped off one his charities, yes, remove him pronto. For that offence, I'm not so sure.