Princes Park Whistler wrote:
Lygon Legends wrote:
I lost all respect for the man, as a true blue, the day after Black Friday... I think he's lost it personally, used to be a very good journalist, now there are heaps better...
That`s ridiculus.Which part of the article do you disagree with?It took a lot of guts to write that.Just because he is a Carlton supporter doesnt mean he shouldn`t write critical articles when they are required.I hope DP stays on as President and think he has done a fantastic job but you cant ignore what has happened.If it was another clubs president we would be reacting the same way.Tim Lane still leads the way as far as integrity in journalism goes.
Tim Lane agreed with the AFL's punishment for CFC in 02. Even the worst of journalists saw that it was excessive, seeing as though we were broke and it was essentially a 5-year sentence. Perhaps he wasn't wanting to be seen as playing favourites.
Comparing Cousins to Pratt is ridiculous, to quote your word. One guy is adored by potentially millions, including little kids and the dangerous thing is he is still idolised. Another guy is not idolised, but respected for getting to the position he is in (financially) and for the charity work he has done previously. Pratt has paid the price for his crime, and it isn't a football issue at all. It's only that he is President of a club that there's any connection there. This price-fixing saga went on before he was even at the club. A NON-FOOTBALL ISSUE turned into one by journalists such as Lane. Cousins is most certainly a football issue, as he is a pin-up boy of the AFL, and his 'crime' occured when he was employed by an AFL club. Tim Lane should have seen that there is a big difference between the two.
I certainly don't think Pratt has brought the game of football into disrepute - he's tarnished his good business record and Visy, but he hasn't tarnished the game. And, I'm not sure Cousins actually has brought the game into disrepute either(I blame the way it has been handled by WCE and the AFL). Sensational journalism by Lane to sell a few papers - not what the Lane of the 80s-90s would have done.