Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 10:56 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 441 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 23  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
People will find many edits in the latter part of this thread.

Please keep your discussions on the topic....WITHOUT resorting to attacking other posters.


:evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
blueboy8 wrote:
popeye wrote:
blueboy8 wrote:
Jolly wasn't a first rounder trade neither was Everitt


I think Jolly was traded for Pick 15, which was Sydney's first in whatever year it was (2005?)


Yeah at least he got a couple right the rest are way off


Jolly was a first rounder. The others were 2nd rounders which is what Clayman was pointing at. Crap players have been traded for 2nd round picks.

Average players have been traded for 1st rounds.

I think we can get a second round for RED.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I remember when everyone was wondering out loud "WTF???" when the Swans gave up their first pick for Jolly. Time makes fools of us all I guess...

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:38 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 2:12 pm
Posts: 130
Location: on a sunny rock
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..you don't trade Fisher.. ..he's extremely hard to match up on, takes consistent contested marks and has been averaging 2/3 goals per game for pretty much most of the season.. ..and he leads up the ground quite good as well.. ..the big red as much as i like hasn't got much of a chance for next year i'm afraid..

..now, in regards to Fev.. ..he is easily, easily a tonne a year goalkicker in even a mediocre side.. ..and next year we can aimn for mediocrity..heh.. ..a sad truth.. ..but in all seriousness Fev cracks the sads out of sheer fustration.. ..sure i know that's little excuse for his childish antics but he's carried the team for the past four of five years.. ..we'd be lucky to have won half the games we have over that time if we didn't have him..

..look at teams with good defences and midfields, a'la eagles and bulldawgs.. ..both are teams screaming for a quality FF.. ..we've got a weak spine as a team, we're crying out for a strong FB, and now ppl are considering trading our FF.. ..ppl are yabbering on about Fev not being in the team when we're challenging for our next flag.. ..i reckon without Fev we won't be challenging for shizen..

..you'll see a new Fev next year.. ..namely a better midfield and with him now getting better support from fellow forwards (see Fisher) he'll be awesome.. ..also note that next year any Fev shenannigans will see him dropped from the team and he knows this.. ..he knows he's at a new club.. ..and ultimately, we need his passion.. ..just this passed weekend the delivery he was getting was fantastic, some of the best in a very long time.. ..with that midfield support Fev will be the oppositions biggest headache..

..it's strange, with all the scientific and medical research going into the game, with the high levels of professionalism and full-time players etc etc etc.. ..long distance kicking accuracy with FF's hasn't improved much over say the last score years.. ..and Fev can reliably kick goals from outside the fifty day in day out.. ..and you just can't trade for that.... ..and Judd isn't worth that.. ..the steeenkin' eagles have Judd, Cousins, Kerr, Braun, Embley etc etc and those poor bastards kill themselves week in and week out cos Lynch isn't a pimple on Fev's hairy buttocks.. ..teams like the eagles and dogs rely on their midfield to kick goals.. ..we trade Fev, and we'll need to rely on the same.. ..and our midfield ain't there yet.. ..we get rid of Fev and they won't get there either..


That is the most persuasive, worst punctuated post ever :)
My mind is changed. Keep Fev.

_________________
don't ask me, I'm just a lizard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 8:24 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
blueboy8 wrote:
Clayman wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Clayman wrote:
Fevs legs will not get him past 29. He is only good when he leaps off the ground to take a contested mark and as you get older you lose the spring you once had. He is no G-Train and will not muscle others out of a contest.

Fev is at his peak now and will not get better. Trade him and get something while we can.

Whitnall should go. We have plenty of kids coming through and they need to be developed. We will at least get a second rounder for him. During trade period things just go silly and players become over-rated, so it should work in our favour.



Hope other clubs think you like in regards to Whitnalls trade value


Tarrant, Hay, Jolly & Grandpa Everitt all went for first rounders so this is where my opinion is based.

Not to mention McGuane, McKernhan, Devenport, Justin Charles etc


Jolly wasn't a first rounder trade neither was Everitt

neither were any of these guys McGuane, McKernhan, Devenport, Justin Charles


As already pointed out, Jolly was a first rounder. You are probably right about Everitt. My point is, that players who have been traded for a second round pick have not been that great. I am sure if someone has the time to research it (I don't) they will prove me correct.

Whitnall will go for a second rounder, I have confidence in our negotiators.

I still stand by my claim that Fev is now at his peak. Neitz & Loyd have not been consistent in their twilight years and these are two people who look after their body off the field.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:43 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Whitall will land a 2nd rounder?
You have confidence in our negotiators?
Whitnall youd be lucky to get a fourth rounder for... even if you had Jimmy Carter negotiating for you.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Michael Jezz wrote:
If we are serious about being a premiership contender in 5 years, the strategic and unemotional decision is to trade Fevola now. You trade Fev not because of his antics but because he is a star at the height of his powers and he will not be there for the Carlton Football Club when it has the chance to challenge in September. He is 27 next year. We are highly unlikely to play finals in the next 2 years, so that makes him 29 plus when we start to ascend. Added to that our young stocks are short of Key position talent. Our current list of young players has Hartlett, Kennedy and Austin as the only genuine KPP prospects (Hampson, Aisakie, Jacobs are Ruckmen). None of those players are guaranteed to make it. IF we could trade him for pick 8 and 15, the foundation is set for a tilt at a premiership in 5 years time. Fevola is the best pure full forward Carlton has produced but I prefer pure premierships and trading him is the key to winning number 17


So we finish on bottom for another few years?
Thought you would be sick of being bottom of the ladder last 4 years, you want another 7 years bottom?
Trade Fev and thats what you got, bottom 4 team for the next 3 years.

FEV CANNOT BE TRADED NEXT YEAR UNLESS HE ASKS FOR A TRADE OR APPROVES THE TRADE. And right now he wants to stay a blue in 2008 from his managers mouth :)

Gotta love contracts, otherwise most of you guys would have the best forward in the league traded for draft picks that could turn out poo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Donstuie wrote:
I remember when everyone was wondering out loud "WTF???" when the Swans gave up their first pick for Jolly. Time makes fools of us all I guess...


I don't understand how you can compare Jolly to Fev lol

Theres a bit of a difference. One is a superstar in the league and the other one is not.

One is the best forward in the league and the other is a ruckman that l hear bugger all about except is a good tap ruckman. I dont think its too hard to find a good tap ruckman.

They jump up in the air and tap the ball to a player. But finding a coleman medalist that can win a game on his own is hard to find!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:35 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
I am really torn over the Fev question - to keep or trade.

I love the way he plays and I can't think of a forward for us that has kicked as well outside 50 as he does. But the one thing that I keep thinking about is Richo at Richmond - for years I have believed that they should have traded him when they had the chance, they rely very heavily on him to be competitive and without him winning the ball they are crap - this has been for a prolonged period of time.

My question is - will we be any different? Am I being hypocritical bagging Richmond (re Richo) when we may be doing the same thing with Fev???

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Whitall will land a 2nd rounder?
You have confidence in our negotiators?
Whitnall youd be lucky to get a fourth rounder for... even if you had Jimmy Carter negotiating for you.


A Fit Lance next year with no knee problems or weight issues will be better then any first rounder/2nd rounder in the draft next year if he is fit.

I'm sure our Best n Fairest when he is fit will be better then a 1st year rookie, maybe not 2nd year, but definantly 1st year.

One thing Carlton needs is leadership next year. With Kouta leaving and Lappin possibly retiring you need good leaders around the young ones otherwise you struggle.

As long as Lance is fit keep him on next year


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:14 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
kingkerna wrote:
I am really torn over the Fev question - to keep or trade.

I love the way he plays and I can't think of a forward for us that has kicked as well outside 50 as he does. But the one thing that I keep thinking about is Richo at Richmond - for years I have believed that they should have traded him when they had the chance, they rely very heavily on him to be competitive and without him winning the ball they are crap - this has been for a prolonged period of time.

My question is - will we be any different? Am I being hypocritical bagging Richmond (re Richo) when we may be doing the same thing with Fev???


Don't understand your logic. Get rid of a player that you need otherwise your crap, so you get crapper?

Doesnt matter anyway mate, Fev aint going anywhere unless he asks for a trade and his manager said he doesnt want a trade


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:46 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Goltzenberg wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
I remember when everyone was wondering out loud "WTF???" when the Swans gave up their first pick for Jolly. Time makes fools of us all I guess...


I don't understand how you can compare Jolly to Fev lol

Theres a bit of a difference. One is a superstar in the league and the other one is not.

One is the best forward in the league and the other is a ruckman that l hear bugger all about except is a good tap ruckman. I dont think its too hard to find a good tap ruckman.

They jump up in the air and tap the ball to a player. But finding a coleman medalist that can win a game on his own is hard to find!!!


When did I compare them? Someone else was talking about Jolly, and it reminded me of the time he was traded. Nothing to do with Fev. Learn to read please.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Fev and Lance
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:53 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:29 pm
Posts: 173
Location: Adelaide
In my eyes Fev and Lance need to stay. We are lacking leadership at our club as it is and to dispose of two leaders (even though they have not shown it at all times) would be not a smart move. I agree they both need to be told to 'shape up', however Fev is a coleman medalist and though this year he hasn't been great he still has managed to kick 56 goals and he has played half injured for most of the season. Where would u find 50 something goals from next year if we traded him.

Thanks, any thoughts

_________________
Blue boy thru and thru


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Goltzenberg wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
I am really torn over the Fev question - to keep or trade.

I love the way he plays and I can't think of a forward for us that has kicked as well outside 50 as he does. But the one thing that I keep thinking about is Richo at Richmond - for years I have believed that they should have traded him when they had the chance, they rely very heavily on him to be competitive and without him winning the ball they are crap - this has been for a prolonged period of time.

My question is - will we be any different? Am I being hypocritical bagging Richmond (re Richo) when we may be doing the same thing with Fev???


Don't understand your logic. Get rid of a player that you need otherwise your crap, so you get crapper?

Doesnt matter anyway mate, Fev aint going anywhere unless he asks for a trade and his manager said he doesnt want a trade


Yep, that worked with Richmond keeping Richo, I'm not saying we should trade him, hell he is the only thing that has given us joy recently. I just hope that in 5 years time we don't look back and wonder what would have happened....

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 12:38 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
People need to understand that draft pick value is dependant on the pool of talent that you're drawing from. It is pointless to bring up examples of trades from previous years and previous drafts to justify future trading and drafting. Last year Aka and Spider changed hands for picks in the 30's. Most clubs would have had at least 50 names on their lists as good draftable players, which means the picks they got for them was going to ensure them a player they rated. Brisbane looked a bit like they were getting reemed for a pick in the 30's for a player of Aka's quality, but they ended up with Chris Schmidt a player who would be a certain 1st round this year.

WH might only have 35 names this year who he thinks are worthy of the club spending the 200 grand minimum to draft, so trading a player for a pick outside this would be tantamount to delisting them.

As for Jolly, ruckmen who are capable of stepping straight into a side and win taps are a rare and sought after commodity, you'll always pay over the odds for them, especially if you're a side in the 'window'.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
kingkerna wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
I am really torn over the Fev question - to keep or trade.

I love the way he plays and I can't think of a forward for us that has kicked as well outside 50 as he does. But the one thing that I keep thinking about is Richo at Richmond - for years I have believed that they should have traded him when they had the chance, they rely very heavily on him to be competitive and without him winning the ball they are crap - this has been for a prolonged period of time.

My question is - will we be any different? Am I being hypocritical bagging Richmond (re Richo) when we may be doing the same thing with Fev???


Don't understand your logic. Get rid of a player that you need otherwise your crap, so you get crapper?

Doesnt matter anyway mate, Fev aint going anywhere unless he asks for a trade and his manager said he doesnt want a trade


Yep, that worked with Richmond keeping Richo, I'm not saying we should trade him, hell he is the only thing that has given us joy recently. I just hope that in 5 years time we don't look back and wonder what would have happened....


Well with that logic, we should get rid of gibbs, murphy , walker, kennedy, griggs etc when they hit 27 and in their prime

Do you really think trading Fevola to get a younger better player will make the club more attractive to other players if they think they get to 27 and get traded for picks?

Heres an example, I dont know who the pies gave up but you would think if you picked up a guy 3 years after he won a brownlow that he would be a good player. What happened to Wowoden? hes only 28 i think now

I just would hate to see Fev get traded for picks or a player that turns to crap like that

I would rather keep a franchise/marquee player on a risk. You know what you got with Fev, good/bad hes the best forward in the league.

We have had a shit coach for 5 years that got nothing out of the players and in two weeks with playing our youngest teams in 37 years we nearly beat two teams that should be in the finals this year.

Its better to keep your marquee player then risk him on players that may never be any good.

Draft picks are great if you get a judd or hodge etc, but what if u get a livingston in the draft for example


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:02 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:13 pm
Posts: 972
If Ratten is coach next year Fev will be at Carlton. Ratten has said he wants Fev in the team next year.

Unless we get a top 3 AFL player like Judd or Pavilich, Fev isnt going anywhere. We can not risk trading Fev for low picks even if a club offer us two first rounder I wouldn't swap that for Fev.

Yet another new coach at Carlton seems to have saved Fev again. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
blueboy8 wrote:
If Ratten is coach next year Fev will be at Carlton. Ratten has said he wants Fev in the team next year.

Unless we get a top 3 AFL player like Judd or Pavilich, Fev isnt going anywhere. We can not risk trading Fev for low picks even if a club offer us two first rounder I wouldn't swap that for Fev.

Yet another new coach at Carlton seems to have saved Fev again. :wink:


Where dont u understand Fev cant be traded if he doesn't ask for a trade or approve a trade :)

He can only be fired or played in the bullants all year if a new coach doesnt want Fev. No coach would play a 500k in the bench all season if he wants to keep his job.

Fev decides his own fate, no one else at Carlton


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:40 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Goltzenberg wrote:
blueboy8 wrote:
If Ratten is coach next year Fev will be at Carlton. Ratten has said he wants Fev in the team next year.

Unless we get a top 3 AFL player like Judd or Pavilich, Fev isnt going anywhere. We can not risk trading Fev for low picks even if a club offer us two first rounder I wouldn't swap that for Fev.

Yet another new coach at Carlton seems to have saved Fev again. :wink:


Where dont u understand Fev cant be traded if he doesn't ask for a trade or approve a trade :)

He can only be fired or played in the bullants all year if a new coach doesnt want Fev. No coach would play a 500k in the bench all season if he wants to keep his job.

Fev decides his own fate, no one else at Carlton


Goltz you need to work at not being so literal about what Fev can and cannot do.

If Fev feels that the team is hell bent on getting rid of him, then he will most likely look to arrange a trade.

Fev saying nope to a trade when the club is keen to trade him, is not enough for it not to happen. Contracts in this instance are not worth much.

Fev is guy who wants to be loved and if the club doesn't love him enough to keep, then he will ask for and be given a trade.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
Goltz I am not suggesting trading him for an unknown - I am talking more on someone like Judd. You still haven't commented on my Richo comparison

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 441 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group