kingkerna wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
I am really torn over the Fev question - to keep or trade.
I love the way he plays and I can't think of a forward for us that has kicked as well outside 50 as he does. But the one thing that I keep thinking about is Richo at Richmond - for years I have believed that they should have traded him when they had the chance, they rely very heavily on him to be competitive and without him winning the ball they are crap - this has been for a prolonged period of time.
My question is - will we be any different? Am I being hypocritical bagging Richmond (re Richo) when we may be doing the same thing with Fev???
Don't understand your logic. Get rid of a player that you need otherwise your crap, so you get crapper?
Doesnt matter anyway mate, Fev aint going anywhere unless he asks for a trade and his manager said he doesnt want a trade
Yep, that worked with Richmond keeping Richo, I'm not saying we should trade him, hell he is the only thing that has given us joy recently. I just hope that in 5 years time we don't look back and wonder what would have happened....
Well with that logic, we should get rid of gibbs, murphy , walker, kennedy, griggs etc when they hit 27 and in their prime
Do you really think trading Fevola to get a younger better player will make the club more attractive to other players if they think they get to 27 and get traded for picks?
Heres an example, I dont know who the pies gave up but you would think if you picked up a guy 3 years after he won a brownlow that he would be a good player. What happened to Wowoden? hes only 28 i think now
I just would hate to see Fev get traded for picks or a player that turns to crap like that
I would rather keep a franchise/marquee player on a risk. You know what you got with Fev, good/bad hes the best forward in the league.
We have had a shit coach for 5 years that got nothing out of the players and in two weeks with playing our youngest teams in 37 years we nearly beat two teams that should be in the finals this year.
Its better to keep your marquee player then risk him on players that may never be any good.
Draft picks are great if you get a judd or hodge etc, but what if u get a livingston in the draft for example