Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 1:28 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 12:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Mitchell is the Bullants coach and Player development caoch.

Both of those are going crap.

Nuff said

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18044
buzzaaaah wrote:
Mitchell is the Bullants coach and Player development caoch.

Both of those are going crap.

Nuff said


How so? :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Wont be an issue at the end of the season.....I dont see Mitchell staying on and if Voss gets the job then I dont see anyone in the footy dept staying.....
I blame Pagan for the Mitchell debacle...a bigger man would have put the team first, remembering it was Mitchell who was forced to move his office away from Pagan...

I thought Mitchell did an ok job .....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
buzzaaaah wrote:
First of all you spelt Lloyd wrong in your sig.

Second, in the Pagan-Mitchell fiasco, Pagan wasnt to blame. Mitchell made a play for his job and failed. He should have had the honour to step aside. Kernahan should have had the balls to sack him. I have nothing but disdain for Mitchell and I think about 90% of Carlton fans (as opposed to TC posters) would agree.


I'm with buzzaaaah. I would not say I have disdain though, from all acounts he was invited to pitch for Pagan's job. Once he didn't get it, I agree, he should have resigned. I'm surprised the new board did not rectify the situation once they assumed power. From an outside perspective this is where I think Sticks' loyalty is potentially dangerous as it seems pretty clear, to me at least, that this is the only explanation as to why Mitchell wasn't asked/made to fall on his sword. If he was always seen as the more valuable commodity than Pagan then Denis should have been sacked at the start of the year.

Having Mitchell banished to the other side of the ground was as embarrassing for the club as it was stupid.

Whether Mitchell will be at the club in 2008 does not phase me greatly, what I am happy about is that the childish scenario that saw him unable to communicate with the club's senior coach (whoever was to blame) has now come to an end, even if it is only for 6 weeks.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Even though I feel that Mitchell's death warrant has been signed, it's an important for Ratts to involve him immediately for the rest of this year. The fact is we need communication between our senior and reserves coaches, so I think it's a great move by Ratts to immediately bring down this wall that has been holding back our young players all year.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:51 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
if he was asked to submit an application

why should he fall on his sword?

some of you guys talk shit.

put it in a typical work place.

there is an open for a manager position, you have aspirations for the role, your boss knows it, tells you to go for it, but in the end the job goes to someone else.

do you quit?

of course you dont!

sometimes you guys can come up with some crazy idea

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:54 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
ScottSaunders wrote:
if he was asked to submit an application

why should he fall on his sword?

some of you guys talk shit.

put it in a typical work place.

there is an open for a manager position, you have aspirations for the role, your boss knows it, tells you to go for it, but in the end the job goes to someone else.

do you quit?

of course you dont!

sometimes you guys can come up with some crazy idea


The difference being that the job didn't go to someone else, it stayed with the incumbent, resulting in the ridiculous situation where the senior and reserve coaches were no longer on speaking terms. Mitchell's position was made untenable because he no longer functioned as part of the organisation, that being the Carlton Football Club.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:59 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10613
1. Mitchell should have waited until "his manager" had been sacked before making his pitch. That's how it works in the real world unless ofcourse your a .... of a guy.

2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
SurreyBlue wrote:
1. Mitchell should have waited until "his manager" had been sacked before making his pitch. That's how it works in the real world unless ofcourse your a .... of a guy.

2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


You think he wasn't told that Pagan was gone? The situation wasn't his fault it was the stooges who you guys voted in to replace the Elliott board.

Mitchell had a pretty good season last year with the ants and has suffered a bit this year with a few of his regulars being promoted. All the players like him and he has done wonders for a few guys who are starring now who had question marks over their careers.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18044
SurreyBlue wrote:
2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


How so?

A good development coach shouldnt be judged on how many premierships he wins.
He is there to communicate with the younger players and accelerate their development. From all reports, the people involved value Mitchells contribution. Most importantly, the players value his work.

what are you making your assessments on Surrey?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
TheGame wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
1. Mitchell should have waited until "his manager" had been sacked before making his pitch. That's how it works in the real world unless ofcourse your a .... of a guy.

2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


You think he wasn't told that Pagan was gone? The situation wasn't his fault it was the stooges who you guys voted in to replace the Elliott board.

Mitchell had a pretty good season last year with the ants and has suffered a bit this year with a few of his regulars being promoted. All the players like him and he has done wonders for a few guys who are starring now who had question marks over their careers.


Agree...Mitchell was the fall guy after Sticks and the stooges buggered up the sacking of Pagan and left Mitchell's ar$e hanging....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


How so?

A good development coach shouldnt be judged on how many premierships he wins.
He is there to communicate with the younger players and accelerate their development. From all reports, the people involved value Mitchells contribution. Most importantly, the players value his work.

what are you making your assessments on Surrey?

I'll tell you what I make the assessment on. Our drafted players hit the seniors and look lost. Collingwood players look like the y belong ditto Sydney amd Wet Toast. Even the rookies that Melbourne and Richmond have debuted looked better than ours.
Bowers looks like a rabbit caught in headlights. Russell appeared after 2 years at Bullants and looked un-ready, ditto Hartlett, etc etc. Is it posssible that they are all duds. Josh Kennedy hasnt progressed

Carazzo, Bentick, Walker allm improved markedly in the seniors.

Whoever thinks Mitchell is doing a good job can come up with something other than "the players love him".

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:48 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
buzzaaaah wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


How so?

A good development coach shouldnt be judged on how many premierships he wins.
He is there to communicate with the younger players and accelerate their development. From all reports, the people involved value Mitchells contribution. Most importantly, the players value his work.

what are you making your assessments on Surrey?

I'll tell you what I make the assessment on. Our drafted players hit the seniors and look lost. Collingwood players look like the y belong ditto Sydney amd Wet Toast. Even the rookies that Melbourne and Richmond have debuted looked better than ours.
Bowers looks like a rabbit caught in headlights. Russell appeared after 2 years at Bullants and looked un-ready, ditto Hartlett, etc etc. Is it posssible that they are all duds. Josh Kennedy hasnt progressed

Carazzo, Bentick, Walker allm improved markedly in the seniors.

Whoever thinks Mitchell is doing a good job can come up with something other than "the players love him".


Bower, Kennedy and co are just babies. Carrazzo, Bentick and Simpson had to bang the door down to get a run in the seniors and Walker has basically been in the ones since the start like Gibbs and Murphy. Don't know who you've been following.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:57 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
TheGame wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
1. Mitchell should have waited until "his manager" had been sacked before making his pitch. That's how it works in the real world unless ofcourse your a .... of a guy.

2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


You think he wasn't told that Pagan was gone? The situation wasn't his fault it was the stooges who you guys voted in to replace the Elliott board.

Mitchell had a pretty good season last year with the ants and has suffered a bit this year with a few of his regulars being promoted. All the players like him and he has done wonders for a few guys who are starring now who had question marks over their careers.

Just like Wayne Brittain who failed at Richmond.

Mitchell may be a good development coach going by the improvement we've seen in Setanta. But he isn't a good match day coach and has failed to get a talented Bullants team over the line in the finals.

Mitchell should have walked when Pagan wasn't sacked.

The cone of silence that existed between Pagan and Mitchell has set us back. Barry deserves the blame for that situation and should have had the decency to walk after he failed to get Pagan's job. It's disgusting to see him back at training a day after Denis got in the neck.

I can't think of another organisation that would keep someone on after they tried and failed to knife a more senior person. You can't defend this unprofessional situation because the other party was Denis.


Last edited by Kouta on Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
buzzaaaah wrote:
Collingwood players look like the y belong ditto Sydney amd Wet Toast.".


bullshit

take out there entire senior division (lets face it ours a shit and give us nothing)

and lets see how Thomas would go as the Prime Ball Mover?

etc..

seriously, 3 clubs you have picked couldnt be a worse example, when considering their Leadership groups.

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:03 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
BlueIce wrote:
TheGame wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
1. Mitchell should have waited until "his manager" had been sacked before making his pitch. That's how it works in the real world unless ofcourse your a .... of a guy.

2. Mitchell is not a very good coach and his record with the NB justifies my statement.


You think he wasn't told that Pagan was gone? The situation wasn't his fault it was the stooges who you guys voted in to replace the Elliott board.

Mitchell had a pretty good season last year with the ants and has suffered a bit this year with a few of his regulars being promoted. All the players like him and he has done wonders for a few guys who are starring now who had question marks over their careers.

Just like Wayne Brittain.

Mitchell may be a good development coach going by the improvement we've seen in Setanta. But he isn't a good match day coach and has failed to get the Bullants over the line in the finals.

Mitchell should have walked when Pagan wasn't sacked.

The cone of silence that existed between Pagan and Mitchell has set us back. Barry deserves the blame for that situation and should have had the decency to walk after he failed to get Pagan's job. It's disgusting to see him back at training a day after Denis got in the neck.


You could say it's disgusting Pagan didn't walk away considering he was voted out before the AFL intervened. Really the decision should have been made for him and they should have just terminated Pagan after the elections considering they were planning all along to turf him out.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:41 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Now that Denis has been sacked, the next off the rank is Mitchell, then Sticks and Bear can say sayonara as well and that will put the whole sorry saga and the pathetic players in this bad soap opera to bed!

The whole thing has been an embarrassment of epic proportions.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18044
buzzaaaah wrote:
I'll tell you what I make the assessment on. Our drafted players hit the seniors and look lost. Collingwood players look like the y belong ditto Sydney amd Wet Toast. Even the rookies that Melbourne and Richmond have debuted looked better than ours.
Bowers looks like a rabbit caught in headlights. Russell appeared after 2 years at Bullants and looked un-ready, ditto Hartlett, etc etc. Is it posssible that they are all duds. Josh Kennedy hasnt progressed

Carazzo, Bentick, Walker allm improved markedly in the seniors.

Whoever thinks Mitchell is doing a good job can come up with something other than "the players love him".


If you look at the facts Buzz, your criticisms are baseless and unfounded.

How have Collingwood and West Coasts players really performed comparatively?
Early midfield picks like Murphy, Gibbs, Pendlebury and Thomas will almost always be good players.

If you want to judge Russell, how has Chris Egan fared who came the pick after?
If you want to judge Bower, how has Danny Stanley or Ben McKinley fared?
McKinley only came in for his first game for West Coast 2 weeks ago. He lasted one game. Stanley has done stuff all.

I'd suggest Kennedy has played some excellent football in the VFL. I'd also suggest Bower. Blackwell and Hartlett have played some quality football.
The fact that they havent established themselves could hardly be placed completely at Mitchells feet.

The fact that they are coming in to the worst performed team for the past 5 years with zero leadership could be a contributing factor as well. Players tend to look like Rabbits in headlights when thats the environment they're playing in.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
The claim that the AFL vetoed Pagan's sacking is idle gossip. Jim Wilson claimed this and this was met with strong denials from Smorgon and the AFL. Is it entirely coincidental that he no longer graces our screens? Others suggest that the presentation by Mitchell was regarded as sub-standard and killed off any chance he had. Once the Board meeting had descended into farce, apologists for the Board would no doubt have seen some advantage in running with the conspiracy theory.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:23 am 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:02 am
Posts: 629
And in 2008 can go right back into it...


It wasn't his fault Smorgan and Co were gutless wonders and couldn't follow though. There was no way (without Pratt) they could pay pagan out. It was rubbish he was even asked to apply. After they back flipped, rightly or wrongly he should have been asked to step down. I'm amazed Swann and Co didn't fix this sooner... or maybe Mitchell is a good development/reserves coach and I know flower all :oops:

But he shouldn't have stayed, he and Pagan supposedly didn't speak and had no rapport. He knew the ramifications of applying for the top coaching job and should have been able to accept the penalty. :wink:

_________________
Chris Judd: 'I've since watched some Steven Seagal movies and realise pressure points are no laughing matter.'


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group