buzzaaaah wrote:
I'll tell you what I make the assessment on. Our drafted players hit the seniors and look lost. Collingwood players look like the y belong ditto Sydney amd Wet Toast. Even the rookies that Melbourne and Richmond have debuted looked better than ours.
Bowers looks like a rabbit caught in headlights. Russell appeared after 2 years at Bullants and looked un-ready, ditto Hartlett, etc etc. Is it posssible that they are all duds. Josh Kennedy hasnt progressed
Carazzo, Bentick, Walker allm improved markedly in the seniors.
Whoever thinks Mitchell is doing a good job can come up with something other than "the players love him".
If you look at the facts Buzz, your criticisms are baseless and unfounded.
How have Collingwood and West Coasts players really performed comparatively?
Early midfield picks like Murphy, Gibbs, Pendlebury and Thomas will almost always be good players.
If you want to judge Russell, how has Chris Egan fared who came the pick after?
If you want to judge Bower, how has Danny Stanley or Ben McKinley fared?
McKinley only came in for his first game for West Coast 2 weeks ago. He lasted one game. Stanley has done stuff all.
I'd suggest Kennedy has played some excellent football in the VFL. I'd also suggest Bower. Blackwell and Hartlett have played some quality football.
The fact that they havent established themselves could hardly be placed completely at Mitchells feet.
The fact that they are coming in to the worst performed team for the past 5 years with zero leadership could be a contributing factor as well. Players tend to look like Rabbits in headlights when thats the environment they're playing in.