Fevola wrote:
Hello people, I said he has been the only shining light over the last few years. Yes we have some potential shining lights, but Fev is the only one that can win us a game of footy on his own.
I did not say no-one else is exciting.
You are all forgetting what he has achieved for Carlton. I have never seen a Carlton Coleman medalist before. He is a BIG reason why our membership is high.
If you count all his stuff ups over the years, its bad but its nothing that we cannot handle with proper leadership and management.
Why are we all turning on Fev now. Its bullshit. You guys are bloody fickle.
Why not mention while we are at it, Waites shits kicks at goal, Carazzos decision making, Houlas softness, Thorntons bitching and always 10 metres behind, Eddies disappearances, Scotlands crap disposal, Fishers kicking for goal, Benticks slowness, Russells chickenshitness, Walkers sometimes poor disposal etc.
I think Thornton is more of a problem on the field than the Fev. Thornton always bags players around him. No-body mentions that. At least Fev gives us something. I dont care what you all say and if you think I am being stupid. I think this bagging of Fev is ridiculous.
I've been on record criticising thorntons abuse of teammates before (several years ago) and stated that he should not be considered for any leadership position whilst that is part of his game.
Fev on field demeanour is significantly worse than thorntons because unlike thornton, there are numerous occassions where Fev just stops chasing or gives less than 100%. I certainly cant recall an occassion where thornton has appeared to give any less than 100% at a contest despite being badly beaten in previous contests. Unfortunately we cant say the same for fevola and therein lies the problem.
On most of the players you listed above - the 'weaknesses' you suggest are mainly due to skill level - not for lack of application. People tend to be less critical of players if they are seen to be doing their best. If their best isnt good enough, then we move them on either through trades or drafting. I'd never criticise prendergast for example because he made the most of his ability. I doubt there would be any person out there who would suggest that Fev has consistently tried to make the most of his ability - even last season there were ocassions where Fev just didnt put in.
Had we good leadership and management, Fev would have been told in no uncertain terms that his attitude and application wasnt good enough. Any repeated failure to step up would have seen him traded years ago.
It is an indictment on how far the club and its administration had fallen that Fev had never previously been 'put in his place' and even considered in the leadership group, let alone for captaincy. Its also somewhat ironic that the only person that had the balls to either discipline fevola (by dropping him) or consider trading him was wayne brittain. Its not surprising that we havent had any good leadership/management from the administration until Pratt became president.