Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 6:23 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Image............!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25463
Location: Bondi Beach
Quote:
No ruckmen = No Finals

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
2 in the bush tommi

2 IN THE BUSH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
grrofunger wrote:
spewing

wish i watched it - we might fire up now ala the robert walls special

youtube anyone?


If you have Foxtel Gro, it is replayed...1am tomorrow morning (Tues), and again tomorrow evening, either 5.30pm or 6.30pm, can't remember which.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:02 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
ah yeah forgot about the ol foxtel replaying every show 85 times

yeah i'll give those times a crack

cheers !

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:43 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
AGRO wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
How did we do so badly with our ruck position? It's just not fair. :cry:



Fair has nothing to do with it. :wink:

We have not drafted a young Ruckman to the club (excluding Hamson and Jacobs) since we drafted Matthew Allan to the club in 1993. :roll:

Adam Matthews.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:01 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:56 pm
Posts: 174
double post...


Last edited by coffee man on Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:01 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:56 pm
Posts: 174
Quote:
Campbell (200cm+) and Taylor (200cm+)...2 kids...rucking in the firsts... and dominating all B Grader comers. Mmmmm if only.....


I'm only bringing it up because I dont believe that playing all the kids with whole games is the right way to go but Campbell is 25 and Taylor is 24 and 9 months and both of them only started getting matches when their reserves form warranted it... (ie. niether have 70 games under their belt)

At the moment NONE of our ruckmen in the bullants have shown enough form to get a game with Carlton and Aisake is not the immediate answer (at least not yet :wink: )

Also Campbell's only 199cm :wink: sorry for nit-picking :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Dannyboy pointed it out yonks ago. He said the success of the non-Victorian sides such as Sydney and West Coast were due largely to thefocus they put on their ruck position. Even BRisbane saw fit to ensure Keating was playing during finals. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:10 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Good on Wallsy for standing up and highlighting these incompetences.
All very obvious to most (bar Sticks & Pagan) but good on him nonetheless.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
coffee man wrote:

At the moment NONE of our ruckmen in the bullants have shown enough form to get a game with Carlton and Aisake is not the immediate answer (at least not yet :wink: )

Also Campbell's only 199cm :wink: sorry for nit-picking :-D


You are correct that you should only pick guys playing in the magoos when their form warrents it, but at the same time when a player at AFL level simply refuses to play at the level required you MUST DROP HIM!!! If Pagan doesn't drop Ackland for the next match, what does it say about our playing group? - that half arsed efforts are acceptable?

The thing is that Ackland did not have one bad game, he has been backing away from the contest all year and it won't change if he is allowed to get away with it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:29 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
bondiblue wrote:
Campbell (200cm+) and Taylor (200cm+)...2 kids...rucking in the firsts... and dominating all B Grader comers. Mmmmm if only.....
:roll:
How did we do so badly with our ruck position? It's just not fair. :cry:


Sorry bondi. Campbell isn't quite your magical 200+cms. He must just be a stop gap until one of the younger true ruckmen come through.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25463
Location: Bondi Beach
coffee man

Quote:
I'm only bringing it up because I dont believe that playing all the kids with whole games is the right way to go but Campbell is 25 and Taylor is 24 and 9 months and both of them only started getting matches when their reserves form warranted it... (ie. niether have 70 games under their belt)


Thanks for that CM...and I agree that it's preferable for kids, especially ruckmen to do their apprenticeship under the tuition and guidance of a ruck master, as well as strengthen their body to withstand the ultimate physical body assault of any player on the field.

If they are mid 20's and have served an apprenticeship, then power to Hawks for doing the right thing by both of them. This implies that Hampson, Aisake and Jacobs, if they are to make it as ruckmen, need another 4-5 years before they peak (not surprising), then we HAVE tTO POACH a competitive, ready made ruckman NOW.

Mordan wrote

Quote:
Sorry bondi. Campbell isn't quite your magical 200+cms. He must just be a stop gap until one of the younger true ruckmen come through.


Shit, you again...you always catch me out.

Look I he looked as though he was 210 cm against Ackland on Friday, so he musn't be far off 200 cm. Haven't got time to check, but will later....he better not be 199.7cm Mordan! Regardless, if he's under 200, he's under 200. Cheers Mordan...keep on keeping on!

Put it this way he looks the minimum size for a ruckman, and if he's what you call a B Grade ruckman, a stop gap, then it must be obvious to everybody that Ackland is a C Grade ruckman...what have we become?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:50 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:11 pm
Posts: 247
Location: Canterbury
A 3 year contract for a reject ruckman is a very poor deal.

Back in 2001 we traded Mark porter for Corey (hot and cold) McKernan and kept matthew (ouchy foot) Allan.
Porter was great value, he always tried his heart out and would actually win a few contests. And his debut vs the Bombres was awesome


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:01 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4955
I'll never understand why we didn't draft Cameron Wood in 2004.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Should we have kept Bryan? :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18045
Donstuie wrote:
Should we have kept Bryan? :?:


No.

Bryan refused to accept a reasonable offer from Carlton as he'd been nobbled by the Pies.
Unless we wanted to pay a stupid amount, it was out of our hands.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Should we have kept Bryan? :?:


No.

Bryan refused to accept a reasonable offer from Carlton as he'd been nobbled by the Pies.
Unless we wanted to pay a stupid amount, it was out of our hands.


plus yhe is just another 195 cm bit part ruckman without the necessary tools to forge out a real career.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:53 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Humpers wrote:
I'll never understand why we didn't draft Cameron Wood in 2004.


Agree.....we have messed around with bit part type ruckman for years now and got nowhere.

re: Bryan....seen him in a couple of Collingwood games and he is still the same player, lazy, and not smart enough at senior level....Collingwood will delist him....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24652
Location: Kaloyasena
Humpers wrote:
I'll never understand why we didn't draft Cameron Wood in 2004.



Well thats what 10 meaningless wins did to us in 2004 it limited our choices and prolonged our chronic deficiencies.

Although granted we could have selected Cameron Wood prior to Jordan Russell in that draft.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluechucky, Google [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group