verbs wrote:
Synbad wrote:
verbs wrote:
Here's the second one.
Now you can be dubious about the link, but there's some pretty detailed facts in there, if they are pie in the sky stuff.
You can make up your own mind, but at least you can see I'm at basing what I say on "something". And I was wrong!! It was Hickmott not McKay

Edit: If you're willing to pay $2.20 for The Age's archives, you will find an article on 31 August 2001 headed "Camporeale signs three-year deal".
Ok how does that dispute that he didnt average $500 pa.
And Mark your inside info had Lance at less than what i said last year...and Campo not in the $600ks this year.
Verbs i never said Campo averaged 620k pa.
are you lying and misleading??
And will you make that bet of 200 bucks to chartity to prove youre not delusional and a tripper???
Average $500K pa over the three years? Or the four years?
SEN said Camporeale was on $620K this year. You said Camporeale is "well into the $600ks". If his contract is backloaded....well??
And what is this bet? When you asked if I would prefer Carlton to win 5 games this year or 6 games this year and I answered by saying I would prefer Carlton wins 14 more games this year..what are we betting? What I would prefer happens this season? Something else? It's got me beat where you plucked this bet from.
you tell me verbs.... what is it???
yeah well 14 is a pipe dream isnt it???
so youre tripping when youre thinking about footy.
cos if you were fair sinkum youd know were closer to winning 6 than 14.. which means were in pp space but of course you dont want a pp... cos were too good for one.. (by one game or maybe two) so we lose 2 gun players cos we win 2 games more...
i plucked the bet from you thinking youd prefer us to win 14 games when i suggested we will win 6ish... thats just a trip!!!!... so if youre not a tripper youd makes a bet to prove youre not a fanciful thinker.. all for charity...
but of course you wont...
see i dont understand your smallmindedness .. cos to me thats what you are...and thats why you dont get my logic... youre too small minded...!!!
you dont get that it doesnt matter what Campo is on...hes on way too much money and were crucified cos of it..same with Lancce.. they dont produce.
so were doomed to win 6 or 7 games and your "preference is 14" thats where were at..
and you reckon i dont get it... i doubt you and your smallminded mates dont get *it*!!!!