phoenix johnson wrote:
AGRO wrote:
King Leonidas wrote:
I wonder how many people will renew their membership for 2006 and beyond knowingly Pagan tanked games to get pick number 2 instead of pick number 5 ?
If Pick 2 was a "Chris Judd" and Pick 5 was a "Danny Roach" I would buy 10 memberships, then I would buy some more memberships for my friends.

Exactly.
I struggle to understand why some people don't want to have the chance of picking up the next Judd or Riewoldt.
The concern i have is that we have already picked up the next Judd or Riewoldt in Andrew Walker. We added a Russell and a Hartlett and an established star in Nick Stevens. And now we need to grab ANOTHER Judd or Riewoldt?
Surely we are not saying that in Andrew Walker we don't have the right guy. Stevens is being bandied about as the next captain, Russell, Hartlett and Blackwell (who i think will all be good for the Blues) are yet to play a game but we are saying we HAVE to finish bottom of the ladder?
I agree we are short on class but as long as the draft exists, every year there will be the temptation to grab the best youngster in the country through the draft. Every year there will be some highly regarded future stars. Is the temptation to get them every year? When do you have enough? When do you look to legitimately take forward steps and not aim to go backwards to go forward?
The addition of the best young talent will be great for our squad in the long run but if we finish with a PP this year and then after 8 rounds next year we have only won 2 1/2 games do we again have this arguement that we need to bottom out and get another PP so as we can go forward.
How much is enough?