Goltzenberg wrote:
Honestly, who really cares how they sound in the media aslong as he gets his team mates fired up and showing leadership out there on the field and in the locker room is the main thing.
To be honest Kernahan and Kouta l dont think were the best at facing the media, even pagan cant put a full sentence together without going umm err etc. So who really cares about that BS.
That's exactly the point though - they weren't that good at facing the media. Kernahan played during a time where media performance wasn't so important, we were winning, we had blokes like Jack and Parkin carrying the media profile.
Kouta was an uninspiring media performer, and it has cost us at the time where we lack sponsors. Collo likewise. Smorgon likewise, Pagan likewise. Sponsors want exposure through success, or failing that, exposure. We can carry dull media performers like those 4 if we
also have a smattering of polished public performers.
Why do you think a shithouse side like Collingwood have sponsors coming out of their arseholes?
Because Eddie is a media performer. Because Bucks has big media exposure.
Fev is a raw media performer, but we have no-one that's able to really defend AND sell the club. It's been that way for 5 years. We can't afford more of that when we now actually have something to sell! Youth! Hope! Excitement! An upturn in finances!
Lance WILL have to develop this side of his ability, he'll be the leadership face of the club, and while blokes like Pratt coming on will give us more media credibility than we've had previously, to simply write off media ability as being unimportant in this case - in Carlton's case - as you have done is in my opinion wrong.