My favourite colour "darknavy" wrote
Quote:
He's not as good as we think
I understand why some people become disillusioned with Waite:
*doesn't keep his feet in a contest
*missing shots at goal
*injury prone
but I believe that suggesting he's not as good as we think is too broad too respond to directly.
As for 'me' what I consider is:
*he's a footballer
*he's 194cm and very athletic
*turns 24 in 2007
*can play wing/midfield has the stamina
*impossible for anyone to avoid injury
*can't play good games whilst injured
*has had 2 injury interrupted preseasons
*difficult match up for the opposition
*busts his gut everytime he chases an opponent
*alot of upside notwithstanding injury
Since his debut as a kid of 20 in 2003
*has won brownlow votes
*played mainly forward in the lowest scoring team in the comp
*kicked 40 goals in a season in 2005 at 22 yo
*represented Australia vs Ireland
*kicked 5 goals in a match
*has not been developed to by great coaches
*lost his father and Carlton great Vin
There is too much upside with Waite to discount. He is still young, and there aren't many 20-23 yo that can match his achievements.
So what's the upside?
2007= 24yo
2008=25yo
2009=26yo
2010=27yo
2011=28yo
2012=29yo
2013=30yo
We get a 10 year player if he continues to develop and stays injury free. I can see Waite taking the FF position if Fev is injured or retires before him. In the meantime, if we give him a position to make his own and start to build a team. I suggest the 6' 4" wimgman.
Some people are too harsh on the kid.
He's not as bad as some think.