simonverbeek wrote:
GWS wrote:
jimmae wrote:
GWS wrote:
There's not too much wrong with the principles as such simonverbeek but I actually don't want unity for the moment.
I want this board dismantled.
I want blood.
I've had enough.
After that unity would be fine thanks.

Re-read GWS, he's stipulating that this should be in-place for a potential election.

Yeah I got that but I want to see the red stuff now!
No time for stuffing around.
They're going to start appointing nuff 1 & nuff 2 pretty soon and then we'll have a coaching panel made up of Denis and the nuff nuffs.
So do you reckon the statement would be better if it included a timeframe? Maybe elections in the next 4 months and an independent coaching review pannel set up by the new board.
Remember, if it happens too quickly then its only Pagan or only Mitchell and no serious coaching application process. I think we all want a proper process. Can you agree to that?
Happy to add a timeframe if that's what you want.
LETS GET EVERYONE ON BOARD
I'm happy to back the general principles simon but the timing of all this is the problem.
4 months?
By then we're going to have a new coaching panel, possibly new recruiting staff, trading over, drafting over, Michael Gardiner, etc etc.
I want something to happen within two weeks.
That might mean that we end up with Mitchell as coach (who might be fine but I'd prefer a broad search) but it also means that we don't end up with greater damage overall.