Blue Vain wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Serious question, but does that 10.7% include the times when he is 5m behind his man or not near the contest because he is walking?
I get what you are saying, but if he is indeed one of the toxic personalities that had been suggested last year, is that someone we need at the club is my question?
As for that backline, it'll be great to see, but who will be directing the traffic if Weitering prefers to go 'insular' under pressure?
A lot of this conjecture is based on GW's statement of us going heavy in this draft.
The question is then, where are those picks going to come from?
We have a lot of collateral to deal with Side. As I mentioned elsewhere, Essendon** will be desperate for early firsts next year to get Bewick. I'd take our next years first for their 2026 first. Maybe a shuffle of later trades. We have picks and players we can move without trading our one decent defender.
As for him being a "toxic personality", how would we know? I doubt the players would keep voting him in the leadership group if that was the case.
I could be wrong but I was under the impression that he was one of the 3 having a sook last year.
Bondi seems to think I was wrong, so I'm happy to believe it.
Either way his actions this year and dropping of the head coupled with his comment of going 'insular' means he's not a leader, not a natural one anyway.
Sorry I haven't see that post but I get what you are saying, the 2027 draft is heavily compromised though.
E.g. If we finish 3rd from the bottom in 2027 that equates to pick 6.
Which unless we do trade away a player like Cripps or Weitering or a heap of seniors retire etc, I doubt they would predict us finishing that low in 2027 especially with Dean, HOF, Smith, Walker and some of the other kids that are stepping up this year.
A mid table prediction would be more likely and then that means our first could be around 15th or 16th.
So if Essendon* finishes 2nd last this year they may want a bit more than just our first next year and some pick swaps.
I think at minimum they will be gunning for our Swans pick also, which could be as low as pick #25 (590pts) if they win the flag and before any compensation picks push theirs back further again.
I'd also be shocked if we traded away too much of our 2027 picks for 2026 ones when we are looking like we will need even more picks in 2028 and beyond.
From a post on Reddit.
It is no wonder the AFL has made changes this year.
Quote:
We have the following father/sons and NGA candidates coming through over the next 5 years.
2026: Cody Walker, Riley Scotland
2027: Mitchell Rice (Dean Rice' son, also eligible for the Saints), Kai Bunyard (NGA), Archie Coady (NGA)
2028: Will Thornton, Lukas Koutoufides, Darcy Johnston (Wayne Johnston' son)
2029: Oscar Judd, Tyler Scotland, Arli Walker
2030: Lewis Betts, Nason Lovett-Murray (Jeff Garlett' son)
Then there are more Judd's, Betts, Casboults, Touhy's in the years following.
And the AFL is looking at all our talented kids coming through and are going shit.
Arli Walker is reported even better than Cody, Lewis Betts and Nason Lovett-Murray are also going to be great players. Oscar Judd is at this moment more interested in cricket than football. Don't know shit about the Scotland boys, but if they have half as much heart as their dad, they will be good players.
Source: Bletch on BigFooty who is a big follower of our academy players and has researched when the kids are coming through.