redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
keogh wrote:
This club has been a disaster for 25 years
I repeat 25 years
Change coach no change
Change List Manager no change
Change CEO no change
Change head of football no change
What’s the common denominator
The Board and yet dummies on here still don’t understand
These people who sit in that room when there time expires they bring in someone new cut from the same cloth
The lack of leadership Priestley has shown in the last 2 weeks is sickening
The board chose Voss
The board ultimately has the final say on who assists him
When Voss is sacked he will become scapegoat number whatever in a long line of scapegoats that takes away the focus of the actual problem
New coach won’t change anything
Rinse and repeat
I do agree with you, and deep down, do believe we need an overhaul of the board, but we've also just hired a new CEO and Head of Football. New hires Within 12 months. My questions would be directed to them.
Why did GW keep Voss on for another year? What was the reasoning? Losing talent because of such a decision needs to have some accountability. From the outside looking in - bad decision. Not a good start.
Has CD identified the football department issue(s) and what is the plan moving forward?
One of them would have stayed, for varying reason
its all speculation, however ill give GW the benefit of the doubt and suggest there is method to the madness.
I would imagine GW saw a number of steps that need to be considered.
1)History suggests he believed talent development was a priority number one.....therefore move on Curnow first rather than Voss. it was about picks and making a stand that a player (or players...throw in Silvagni and Docherrty) doesn't dictate who is coach.
2) make a decision on the coach. he will have known all along Voss wasn't the right coach, however one step at a time (set up for the draft) and at least give Voss a chance with more football resource.
3) the decision to move on Austin at the same time, links Voss to our list strategy.
re the board, my only issue is the lack of quality football experience. Diesel is not the right person by any stretch. I do give the board credit for appointing GW to replace BC. I would hope that GW and CD is a step up in football experience. ensuring football spohistication is sitting at the board table to act as advocates for GW and CD is necessary in my view.
with respect to the wider remit the board has (governance, strategy and financial strength), it is hard to argue against them doing a good job.