Traveller86 wrote:
Quote:
Needs to be forcibly removed.
Are you for real? No consideration for the other half who like Voss?
Why don't you start your sentence with...I think....
This is Toxic
Quote:
He’s bringing the club further down with him (if that’s even possible) with his non selections, favouritism and punishing players he doesn’t like.
Are you for real? What a crazy, outlandish comment.
We lost our FF, Ruck and CHB in the off season, and didnt replace any of them.
We bought back our injury prone 2nd ruck to play more than the 60% GT he is capable of.
Only 7 games have been played in 2026.
We started the season with 13 out injured and lost to Swans by 63 in Sydney.
Swans beat last years Premiers by 44, then beat the AFL's Nepo baby GCS by 32, GWS by 41, Dogs by 66 points.
After our close win vs Tigers, we have led games and lost in the last by margins of 23, 10, 28, 5, 14. That is not a disgrace. That is not a team not trying.
He's picked a team, with the MC, to win this week. Lets see what happens. Like many others, i think ww can win this. That's not blind faith nor so called "Toxic Positivity".
Now, tell us about these...
Non selections? Who and why should they be selected?
Favouritism? Who and why should be ommitted?
Punishing players he doesn't like? This one is a doozie. Who doesn't he like?
Why would you say that? Any Proof?
You state things like they are facts. They are not facts. Until they are proven facts, they are merely your rumours.
Lets calm the farm, and see if the team finds the formula and get us a few wins, then try and work out why they won, and determine what gaps we need to close.
If there's proof the players have given up playing for the coach, then we will deal with that when and if that happens. Reality Trav, there's no proof players aren't playing for the coach, or that the MC has got its selections wrong, especially when we dont know about anything that goes on behind the 4 walls.