Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:35 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 944 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2873
bondiblue wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three offseasons to change personal and the gameplan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.


Lets see what Austin has given Vossy

2022: Cerra, Motlop Young Hewett...they helped us improve our midfield out of sight. Young had beaten C.Curnow
2023: Hollands, Cowan, Binns, Acres,Lemmey O'Keefe.....we needed and got wings, got us to a Prelim
2024: Hollands, Moir, Wilson, Fantasia, Monohan, Lord.... got on injury plagued team into the Finals
2025: Smith O'Farrell, Campo, Campo, Charleson, Carroll, Duffy, Evans, White LTI, Young LTI....Believed in group, Passed on Houston, went for kids before Tassie happens....start the season with 13 out injured. We have no depth

Which picks didnt help our cause?

Champion Data tells us Carlton is one of 16 of the 18 teams that go long and direct towards goal. which creates less control, gains territory, gains speed and challenges degense.

WE all know we have more F50 than most teams so we get it in there, but our skills have failed us with execution, or our smalls have failed to keep the ball in.

Austin had already added Durdin, Fogarty and Williams and recruited for Vossy Motlop, Fantasia and LTI's White, Evans


So is your point that Voss got what he wanted from Austin?

So it’s not recruitment and it’s not coaches, it’s just the players?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
Humpers wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
According to the HUN we might chase Darcy Cameron (turns 30 in July) if TDK leaves. If correct then this suggests that Wright won't be going down the full rebuild route and might believe this group is capable of contending with a few tweaks to the list.


I'm sure he will. Collingwood looked like they were at full rebuild stage a few years ago when they shipped off Grundy, Treloar, and Stephenson for not much, paying some of their salary, and then finished 17th the next year. 2 years later they won the flag with an aging list. It can turn around fast if you get it right. But the ace was the change from Bucks to McCrae.

The ace was Nick Daicos.

100%


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:00 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 794
Location: Funky Town
Humpers wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
According to the HUN we might chase Darcy Cameron (turns 30 in July) if TDK leaves. If correct then this suggests that Wright won't be going down the full rebuild route and might believe this group is capable of contending with a few tweaks to the list.


I'm sure he will. Collingwood looked like they were at full rebuild stage a few years ago when they shipped off Grundy, Treloar, and Stephenson for not much, paying some of their salary, and then finished 17th the next year. 2 years later they won the flag with an aging list. It can turn around fast if you get it right. But the ace was the change from Bucks to McCrae.

The ace was Nick Daicos.


Such a good point!!

Most people forget Collingwood picked up the best young goal kicking mid, for a few mid range draft picks.

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three off seasons to change personal and the game plan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.

We've traded in players that may have not had the output that is required or remained injury free.
We got Acres (2022), Fantasia (2023). Elijah (2023) and Haynes (2024).
Acres had a couple of good years, Fantasia and Elijah have hardly played and Haynes is looking like the best of them all but he's only going to be good for another year or two max.
Also players have contracts, he can't just come in and wipe the floor of the players he doesn't need.
We've kept Martin, Marchbank, Williams and others because of this.
We've also missed out on some good players like Houston.

As for changing the game plan.
He has been trying to, we seen it in the preseason, we've seen it for a quarter or so nearly every game this year.
The list is the choking point, coupled with a lack of depth and an on-going injury issue.
Our forward line has not been settled for 14 rounds now.

Our list has a lot more holes in it that people realise, is it catastrophic rebuild - no.
But we are missing required players in key areas to make game plan changes - yes.
You could argue we have players that can play those roles to a level, however they have been injured.
You can't tell me our F50 entires and shots on goal would not look a lot better if we had Elijah, Cotts, Harry, Charlie, Durdin, kemp and Williams up and running all season.
You also can't tell me if we had better delivery and foot speed on the wings and in the middle the players there would not also be kicking goals or at minimum drilling targets in F50.

Targeting the coach is the easy way, we've done this for 20+ years because we all think our players are the best.
Some go to other teams and have had a good career, most don't or don't even get traded.
That is the reality.
Would you have Stocker, Fish or Dow back in the side?
3 players that were 'recruited for the coach', I know I wouldn't.

Just look at our VFL side and tell me who would be 1st 18, has been in the system for a few years and has not made the cut on a regular basis or at all.
Drafting and trading is a balance of old and new and it has been pretty much all new = 2-5 years development and it's still a lottery.
So I'd say, he's only been here for 3 preseasons, if we get to 6 and we are not back playing finals, then I'll have an issue with the coach also.
For me I have seen Voss make a lot of good tactical changes this season, I have also seen his change in game plan and ball movement.
I have also seen like last week, senior players miss targets under no pressure, drop marks under no pressure, choose a contest over a player in space.
10 players had a kicking eff 50% or less against the bottom of the ladder side, that is a pretty poor output.
Time to see the forest through the trees, this is bigger than the coach can't coach.


I actually answered the question, why do we play the way we do….

I’d like to see players held to account more. Acres as an example wouldn’t be playing this week, having played on and missed from 5 meters, having taken a shot in q2 when he had players free (although maybe he was trying to pass!). Docherty did the same. 2 senior players, playing for themselves and both playing this week. I think selection integrity has been an issue across his tenure.

And yes, we’d look better if we had our best 23 available every week, I think every side would. But it often doesn’t happen, and the better sides have systems in place that allow them to lose players and still win. The GWS game was a prime example, they were missing plenty of their best players and still played their way.

We don’t have the right systems, maybe because we don’t have the right players, or maybe because the coach thinks his gameplan is what wins games.

I don’t think Voss will be a premiership coach, at Carlton or any club. There are also players that wouldn’t be premiership players irrespective of which club they’re at. Ability often limits success.

I agree with what you've said, maybe not the part about Voss though.
TBH, I don't know if he will or won't be.
None of us do, but I've seen enough to keep him on and adjust the playing list a little to see if he can get us back in the finals.

I agree we need to make players accountable also.
BV and GEX have both pointed out that Acres at his current capacity is probably still better than say Lucas.
I don't fully disagree, however I do think we have the capacity to make a change this weekend to send a message, but we clearly didn't.
Maybe Voss is trying to save his bacon, maybe the tail is wagging the dog, who knows.
I don't think we have the right systems because of personnel, otherwise injuries wouldn't affect the game plan so much as they do.

GWS has a lot better depth than us, all over the ground.
They let Haynes walk who is now one of our better defenders and their defence is still off the charts.
Imagine if we didn't have Haynes and let's say JSOS left, we'd be a shambles down back.
And that is the thing about our depth, we need pretty much a fully fit team (Bondi has calculated less than 8 injured) in order for us to win games.
This is now the second year we have struggled with key injuries, our list is fragile at best.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 944 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group