Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:11 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 944 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 1:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


Because Voss can't coach ?
Because the players aren't playing for him?
Because he doesn't know how to get the best from what his been given?
Because Sayer flashed his cock?

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 1:55 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
So I was wondering about how we are travelling with the Jagga deal and I checked on some numbers.

The trade that matters was with the Hawks for their 2024 pick #14 for our 2025 1st and 2nd picks.
The Lions and Eagles trades were just moving chairs around the room.

We used 2024 pick #12, 2025 1st and 2025 2nd to get 2024 pick #3.
As the points system has changed it is best to keep it all in this year for this comparison.

Our ladder position now is 10th, pick #9 - 1355pts
Our second pick would then be pick #27 - 533pts
If you add what pick #12 would be this year - 1140pts
That comes to a total of 3028pts (picks #3 + #18)
Pick #1 is 3000pts, pick #2 is 2481pts and pick #3 is 2178pts.

When F/S picks, academy picks and FA picks all come in that only gets better for us on a points basis.

Given that Jagga was touted to be a #1 pick by us and others and if we keep this position or marginally better, we will walk out of this trade pretty much on par.


Nice one Sidex

I was thinking about criticism towards Carlton for not using the 2 first rounders we had instead of trading them both for the No 3 pick, and it would take years to determine the outcome given Jagga did the ACL, but from a points perspective that analysis is GOLD.

I'll by you a beer, and if you dont drink beer I'll buy you a beetroot juice :thumbsup:

I think that'd be a different discussion, 2 firsts was a great way to hedge our bets and given Jaggas injury it would've been the smarter move at the moment.
But until we see what Jagga can do, it's all speculation if it was the right move or not.
His preseason was looking awesome though.

As far as points go we are going ok.

I'll have a beer with you, beets is for recovery the next day. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
So I was wondering about how we are travelling with the Jagga deal and I checked on some numbers.

The trade that matters was with the Hawks for their 2024 pick #14 for our 2025 1st and 2nd picks.
The Lions and Eagles trades were just moving chairs around the room.

We used 2024 pick #12, 2025 1st and 2025 2nd to get 2024 pick #3.
As the points system has changed it is best to keep it all in this year for this comparison.

Our ladder position now is 10th, pick #9 - 1355pts
Our second pick would then be pick #27 - 533pts
If you add what pick #12 would be this year - 1140pts
That comes to a total of 3028pts (picks #3 + #18)
Pick #1 is 3000pts, pick #2 is 2481pts and pick #3 is 2178pts.

When F/S picks, academy picks and FA picks all come in that only gets better for us on a points basis.

Given that Jagga was touted to be a #1 pick by us and others and if we keep this position or marginally better, we will walk out of this trade pretty much on par.


Those two first round picks ended up being pick 15 and pick 17. Joe Berry and Murphy Reid (probably closest player type to Jagga). Of all the guys taken after pick 15, Murphy Reid looks the best of them. All the others jury out.

That's another way to look at it also.
It's going to be a real watch and wait as far as player development goes on who we could've picked instead.
I'm still happy with Jagga, just spewing he couldn't have helped us this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu Jun 19, 2025 5:10 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9824
Location: Australia
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
So I was wondering about how we are travelling with the Jagga deal and I checked on some numbers.

The trade that matters was with the Hawks for their 2024 pick #14 for our 2025 1st and 2nd picks.
The Lions and Eagles trades were just moving chairs around the room.

We used 2024 pick #12, 2025 1st and 2025 2nd to get 2024 pick #3.
As the points system has changed it is best to keep it all in this year for this comparison.

Our ladder position now is 10th, pick #9 - 1355pts
Our second pick would then be pick #27 - 533pts
If you add what pick #12 would be this year - 1140pts
That comes to a total of 3028pts (picks #3 + #18)
Pick #1 is 3000pts, pick #2 is 2481pts and pick #3 is 2178pts.

When F/S picks, academy picks and FA picks all come in that only gets better for us on a points basis.

Given that Jagga was touted to be a #1 pick by us and others and if we keep this position or marginally better, we will walk out of this trade pretty much on par.


Nice one Sidex

I was thinking about criticism towards Carlton for not using the 2 first rounders we had instead of trading them both for the No 3 pick, and it would take years to determine the outcome given Jagga did the ACL, but from a points perspective that analysis is GOLD.

I'll by you a beer, and if you dont drink beer I'll buy you a beetroot juice :thumbsup:


What if he doesn't like beer, beet, or juice?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:02 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
sinbagger wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
So I was wondering about how we are travelling with the Jagga deal and I checked on some numbers.

The trade that matters was with the Hawks for their 2024 pick #14 for our 2025 1st and 2nd picks.
The Lions and Eagles trades were just moving chairs around the room.

We used 2024 pick #12, 2025 1st and 2025 2nd to get 2024 pick #3.
As the points system has changed it is best to keep it all in this year for this comparison.

Our ladder position now is 10th, pick #9 - 1355pts
Our second pick would then be pick #27 - 533pts
If you add what pick #12 would be this year - 1140pts
That comes to a total of 3028pts (picks #3 + #18)
Pick #1 is 3000pts, pick #2 is 2481pts and pick #3 is 2178pts.

When F/S picks, academy picks and FA picks all come in that only gets better for us on a points basis.

Given that Jagga was touted to be a #1 pick by us and others and if we keep this position or marginally better, we will walk out of this trade pretty much on par.


Nice one Sidex

I was thinking about criticism towards Carlton for not using the 2 first rounders we had instead of trading them both for the No 3 pick, and it would take years to determine the outcome given Jagga did the ACL, but from a points perspective that analysis is GOLD.

I'll by you a beer, and if you dont drink beer I'll buy you a beetroot juice :thumbsup:


What if he doesn't like beer, beet, or juice?


:grin:

You know me sin.
With fun tickets we can always find happiness
Never a dull moment.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 7:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2873
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three offseasons to change personal and the gameplan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 9:07 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10593
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three offseasons to change personal and the gameplan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.


:thumbsup: Normally how it works, until of course the ‘change request’ has been handed in.
:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4773
I dislike inflexible stubborn coaches. You need to move with the times. You need to look at the strengths of the players you have an put a plan in place that makes those players shine.

This type of coaching is a dictatorship. My way or the high way. A Good leader makes others shine, not sets them up to fail.

He has players not in their natural positions. Its ok to try, but seek that players feedback to see if they want are happy and can do it. Makes all the difference.

So it took JSOS to go up to Voss to say can he play backline. Look what has happened since.

Seriously these coaches between them dont have clue. Or the main one in Voss overrules others. Who knows. Its their damn jobs to figure it out and look at each player and just look and ask.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:37 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three off seasons to change personal and the game plan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.

We've traded in players that may have not had the output that is required or remained injury free.
We got Acres (2022), Fantasia (2023). Elijah (2023) and Haynes (2024).
Acres had a couple of good years, Fantasia and Elijah have hardly played and Haynes is looking like the best of them all but he's only going to be good for another year or two max.
Also players have contracts, he can't just come in and wipe the floor of the players he doesn't need.
We've kept Martin, Marchbank, Williams and others because of this.
We've also missed out on some good players like Houston.

As for changing the game plan.
He has been trying to, we seen it in the preseason, we've seen it for a quarter or so nearly every game this year.
The list is the choking point, coupled with a lack of depth and an on-going injury issue.
Our forward line has not been settled for 14 rounds now.

Our list has a lot more holes in it that people realise, is it catastrophic rebuild - no.
But we are missing required players in key areas to make game plan changes - yes.
You could argue we have players that can play those roles to a level, however they have been injured.
You can't tell me our F50 entires and shots on goal would not look a lot better if we had Elijah, Cotts, Harry, Charlie, Durdin, kemp and Williams up and running all season.
You also can't tell me if we had better delivery and foot speed on the wings and in the middle the players there would not also be kicking goals or at minimum drilling targets in F50.

Targeting the coach is the easy way, we've done this for 20+ years because we all think our players are the best.
Some go to other teams and have had a good career, most don't or don't even get traded.
That is the reality.
Would you have Stocker, Fish or Dow back in the side?
3 players that were 'recruited for the coach', I know I wouldn't.

Just look at our VFL side and tell me who would be 1st 18, has been in the system for a few years and has not made the cut on a regular basis or at all.
Drafting and trading is a balance of old and new and it has been pretty much all new = 2-5 years development and it's still a lottery.
So I'd say, he's only been here for 3 preseasons, if we get to 6 and we are not back playing finals, then I'll have an issue with the coach also.
For me I have seen Voss make a lot of good tactical changes this season, I have also seen his change in game plan and ball movement.
I have also seen like last week, senior players miss targets under no pressure, drop marks under no pressure, choose a contest over a player in space.
10 players had a kicking eff 50% or less against the bottom of the ladder side, that is a pretty poor output.
Time to see the forest through the trees, this is bigger than the coach can't coach.


Last edited by Sidefx on Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:46 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
Drewgirl wrote:
I dislike inflexible stubborn coaches. You need to move with the times. You need to look at the strengths of the players you have an put a plan in place that makes those players shine.

This type of coaching is a dictatorship. My way or the high way. A Good leader makes others shine, not sets them up to fail.

He has players not in their natural positions. Its ok to try, but seek that players feedback to see if they want are happy and can do it. Makes all the difference.

So it took JSOS to go up to Voss to say can he play backline. Look what has happened since.

Seriously these coaches between them dont have clue. Or the main one in Voss overrules others. Who knows. Its their damn jobs to figure it out and look at each player and just look and ask.

JSOS wanted to be a forward, he then ended up being a utility before Voss.
He asked to stay in the backline and it is working for him.
That is not a coaching issue.

We play players out of position because of injury in most cases.
Look at Lord, in his words, playing where he's required.
This is still an injury vs depth issue.

The other thing that irks me about this line of thought is that people scold the coach for not making positional changes and when he does, then they are being played out of position.
Kemp forward was a good move, so was Ollie in defence, what about Cinc as a shutdown player.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:59 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16961
Location: Melbourne
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hagRb6gMmxo

Salary cap explained.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 11:15 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6553
Cazzesman wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hagRb6gMmxo

Salary cap explained.

Regards Cazzesman

Thanks Cazz.

Very interesting.
Especially the part about clubs targeting developed players more now because of the compromised drafts.
Clearly something we need to catch up on and what I have eluded to a few posts before this.

Also interesting they said with the Aints in 14th now they will have pick #5 in the draft but with potential F/S and Academy bids it could blow out to #13.

I think I've changed my position now, I'd ask TDK how much would it cost to make him stay and go up to 1.4/5m.
Because our compo pick could end up being in the #20s.
Either that or have a gun player in mind that will neutralise that pick if he goes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 1:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three offseasons to change personal and the gameplan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.


Lets see what Austin has given Vossy

2022: Cerra, Motlop Young Hewett...they helped us improve our midfield out of sight. Young had beaten C.Curnow
2023: Hollands, Cowan, Binns, Acres,Lemmey O'Keefe.....we needed and got wings, got us to a Prelim
2024: Hollands, Moir, Wilson, Fantasia, Monohan, Lord.... got on injury plagued team into the Finals
2025: Smith O'Farrell, Campo, Campo, Charleson, Carroll, Duffy, Evans, White LTI, Young LTI....Believed in group, Passed on Houston, went for kids before Tassie happens....start the season with 13 out injured. We have no depth

Which picks didnt help our cause?

Champion Data tells us Carlton is one of 16 of the 18 teams that go long and direct towards goal. which creates less control, gains territory, gains speed and challenges degense.

WE all know we have more F50 than most teams so we get it in there, but our skills have failed us with execution, or our smalls have failed to keep the ball in.

Austin had already added Durdin, Fogarty and Williams and recruited for Vossy Motlop, Fantasia and LTI's White, Evans

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4945
According to the HUN we might chase Darcy Cameron (turns 30 in July) if TDK leaves. If correct then this suggests that Wright won't be going down the full rebuild route and might believe this group is capable of contending with a few tweaks to the list.
Not sure how we would get a deal done for Cameron with our current draft picks likely needed for Harry Dean and Cody Walker. The TDK compensation would be paying too much for Cameron with the Pies not having a first round coming back our way.
Interesting times.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:24 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9076
Location: Melbourne
Humpers wrote:
According to the HUN we might chase Darcy Cameron (turns 30 in July) if TDK leaves. If correct then this suggests that Wright won't be going down the full rebuild route and might believe this group is capable of contending with a few tweaks to the list.


I'm sure he will. Collingwood looked like they were at full rebuild stage a few years ago when they shipped off Grundy, Treloar, and Stephenson for not much, paying some of their salary, and then finished 17th the next year. 2 years later they won the flag with an aging list. It can turn around fast if you get it right. But the ace was the change from Bucks to McCrae.

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:40 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4945
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
According to the HUN we might chase Darcy Cameron (turns 30 in July) if TDK leaves. If correct then this suggests that Wright won't be going down the full rebuild route and might believe this group is capable of contending with a few tweaks to the list.


I'm sure he will. Collingwood looked like they were at full rebuild stage a few years ago when they shipped off Grundy, Treloar, and Stephenson for not much, paying some of their salary, and then finished 17th the next year. 2 years later they won the flag with an aging list. It can turn around fast if you get it right. But the ace was the change from Bucks to McCrae.

The ace was Nick Daicos.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24640
Location: Kaloyasena
Humpers wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
According to the HUN we might chase Darcy Cameron (turns 30 in July) if TDK leaves. If correct then this suggests that Wright won't be going down the full rebuild route and might believe this group is capable of contending with a few tweaks to the list.


I'm sure he will. Collingwood looked like they were at full rebuild stage a few years ago when they shipped off Grundy, Treloar, and Stephenson for not much, paying some of their salary, and then finished 17th the next year. 2 years later they won the flag with an aging list. It can turn around fast if you get it right. But the ace was the change from Bucks to McCrae.

The ace was Nick Daicos.



Is Cody Walker that good - asking for a friend.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3460
We were into Darcy Cameron when he left the Swans, iirc. Pretty sure we ended up with Pitto when he chose the Pies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2873
Sidefx wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Contested football does not allow for time and space to execute. That’s what our coach keeps wanting us to play, I’ll say it again - contested footy……doesn’t allow us to find space in the forward line, hence why our scoring is down…… contested footy.

Now have you asked yourself why we might play that kind of football?


We’ve played that way since Voss arrived, he clearly thinks it’s the way to win.

He’s had three off seasons to change personal and the game plan.

I refuse to believe that the list management wouldn’t recruit to serve what the coach needs/wants.

We've traded in players that may have not had the output that is required or remained injury free.
We got Acres (2022), Fantasia (2023). Elijah (2023) and Haynes (2024).
Acres had a couple of good years, Fantasia and Elijah have hardly played and Haynes is looking like the best of them all but he's only going to be good for another year or two max.
Also players have contracts, he can't just come in and wipe the floor of the players he doesn't need.
We've kept Martin, Marchbank, Williams and others because of this.
We've also missed out on some good players like Houston.

As for changing the game plan.
He has been trying to, we seen it in the preseason, we've seen it for a quarter or so nearly every game this year.
The list is the choking point, coupled with a lack of depth and an on-going injury issue.
Our forward line has not been settled for 14 rounds now.

Our list has a lot more holes in it that people realise, is it catastrophic rebuild - no.
But we are missing required players in key areas to make game plan changes - yes.
You could argue we have players that can play those roles to a level, however they have been injured.
You can't tell me our F50 entires and shots on goal would not look a lot better if we had Elijah, Cotts, Harry, Charlie, Durdin, kemp and Williams up and running all season.
You also can't tell me if we had better delivery and foot speed on the wings and in the middle the players there would not also be kicking goals or at minimum drilling targets in F50.

Targeting the coach is the easy way, we've done this for 20+ years because we all think our players are the best.
Some go to other teams and have had a good career, most don't or don't even get traded.
That is the reality.
Would you have Stocker, Fish or Dow back in the side?
3 players that were 'recruited for the coach', I know I wouldn't.

Just look at our VFL side and tell me who would be 1st 18, has been in the system for a few years and has not made the cut on a regular basis or at all.
Drafting and trading is a balance of old and new and it has been pretty much all new = 2-5 years development and it's still a lottery.
So I'd say, he's only been here for 3 preseasons, if we get to 6 and we are not back playing finals, then I'll have an issue with the coach also.
For me I have seen Voss make a lot of good tactical changes this season, I have also seen his change in game plan and ball movement.
I have also seen like last week, senior players miss targets under no pressure, drop marks under no pressure, choose a contest over a player in space.
10 players had a kicking eff 50% or less against the bottom of the ladder side, that is a pretty poor output.
Time to see the forest through the trees, this is bigger than the coach can't coach.


I actually answered the question, why do we play the way we do….

I’d like to see players held to account more. Acres as an example wouldn’t be playing this week, having played on and missed from 5 meters, having taken a shot in q2 when he had players free (although maybe he was trying to pass!). Docherty did the same. 2 senior players, playing for themselves and both playing this week. I think selection integrity has been an issue across his tenure.

And yes, we’d look better if we had our best 23 available every week, I think every side would. But it often doesn’t happen, and the better sides have systems in place that allow them to lose players and still win. The GWS game was a prime example, they were missing plenty of their best players and still played their way.

We don’t have the right systems, maybe because we don’t have the right players, or maybe because the coach thinks his gameplan is what wins games.

I don’t think Voss will be a premiership coach, at Carlton or any club. There are also players that wouldn’t be premiership players irrespective of which club they’re at. Ability often limits success.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10593
Cazzesman wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hagRb6gMmxo

Salary cap explained.

Regards Cazzesman


:thumbsup: Great capture. Thanks Cazz.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 944 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], jezzarules, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group