Blue Vain wrote:
DesEnglish wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Show me where Vossy’s game plan says you should go into every contest like you’ve just had your nails painted.
Show me his game plan
So because you don't know the game plan, it doesn't exist? The game plan isn't the problem.
On field leadership is the problem.
George Hewitt stifles Nick Daicos in the first half and is close to BOG. Daicos goes to Cripps for the first 2 centre bounces of the 3rd quarter and the captain allows him to waltz out of both stoppages with the ball. Absolutely zero pressure. Absolutely piss weak effort. The tide has turned. The ball goes into Collingwood's forward half and Ollie Hollands is in a one on one and Docherty refuses to commit his body to compete. He apologises but Ollie didn't want an apology. He wants the leaders to do their job.
The effort Hewitt has put into Daicos is pissed down the drain because the captain needs to be in the hit zone for the ruckman instead of sacrificing his role.
Five minutes of the third quarter and momentum is gone. Confidence in team adhesion is going. Belief in a full ground system is eroding because experienced players aren't doing their job. The role players are doing
their job. We don't change momentum when it goes against us. Why? Because individuals then try to "save" the team or save themselves instead of staying committed to what got them the lead.
All teams go through fadeouts and momentum swings but some minimise it and break the pattern. Because their leaders lead a team based resurgence. They re-instil belief in what has worked and make sure they're the beacons of it. Why should a young bloke put his body at risk in a marking contest when McGovern and Docherty don't? Why should Motlop give the first option when the pressure goes up?
He gets the ball and thinks he can take on 5 players. Why not? The captain does it.
The players can talk connection, team etc. But talk's cheap. This game plan can work. It's suited to our list profile. But no game plan works when some players think the expectations don't apply to them. You can keep sacking coaches but that's not the answer.
It's an endless cycle. The players have to set their own standards and be accountable. Standards that apply to everyone.
I do agree with this but it goes deeper
Our list management is the worst in the comp
Our depth is terrible because of it
And the review Sayers had 4 years agonywas only about him wanting the coach and CEO gone
The football department remained untouched
Voss must drop players regardless of what’s in the twos
And something major has to be done at the end of the year
Star players have to be traded for draft picks before Tassie comes in
We as a club have never rebuilt
Never
It’s been the same cycle of shit for 25 years