Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 2:25 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 216 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
bluehammer wrote:
The reason we won't play Harry at CHB, especially without TDK, is that it takes away another attacking down the line option.

Our down the line kicks would need Pitto to learn how to mark or Charlie to push right up.

I mean sure, if we get better at not needing down the line kicks I'm all for it...


exactly. charlie can’t play a lone tall role up forward without being tripled out of everything that comes into the F 50.

i’d consider H to CHB for parts of games occasionally but it’s not gonna work for a season, he’s too valuable up forward, especially in the first and fourth quarters.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
99prelim wrote:
DocSherrin III wrote:
I'd be playing Harry at CHB. Permanently. Partner for Weitering solved. Martin and Curnow in attack.


Slight variation Doc...and just because I'm a believer in changing things up and being unpredictable

Different rotations of the following:
Play Harry at CHB as you suggested with Curnow and Martin up fwd...possibly Kemp in F50 as well
Play Curnow at CHB with Kemp spending some minutes at FF. Is a good mark which is a starting point
Play Curnow on a wing and Walsh (or even Acres) playing the HF role to support Martin and Harry
Rotate Boyd, Kennedy and E Hollands from mid to HB to HF

All these scenarios should be well planned, understood and practiced with the SINGLE intention of getting the opposition coaches box to actually do some **** thinking rather than relax because our gamestyle, strategies and personnel are just a fixed template

By the way, I'm sure this is discussed but FFS, can they practice practice practice Curnow and Harry ALWAYS playing about 30m away from each other. Assign which small fwds are at the feet of which player. If this is being spoken about and practiced, it's not being executed well AT ALL!!!!!!


you left out Crippa at CHF and Weiters at FF.

:-)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
99prelim wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
The reason we won't play Harry at CHB, especially without TDK, is that it takes away another attacking down the line option.

Our down the line kicks would need Pitto to learn how to mark or Charlie to push right up.

I mean sure, if we get better at not needing down the line kicks I'm all for it...


Understand your sentiment bh and it's made me think lately

Would I prefer 2 gun KPFs and 1 gun KPD OR 1 gun KPF and 2 gun KPD??

Of course we would like both, but my view is that if you go in with a shorter forward line, the coaches can create a game style that may counteract this deficiency (see Richmond and even Coll)

On the other hand, it's very hard to counteract if you have an undersize defence bc you're at the mercy of the other team's I50 delivery

We know that if the mids get first use and put pressure on the ball carrier, you can disrupt the impact of the oppo's tall fwds

I would love to see Charlie and Harry develop a more "utility" mindset. it's already happening now but would love if it was more a part of our structure than a novelty to slow down tempo and save the game


yeah if it’s 2 forward 1 back for elite talls vs 2 back and one forward, given our midfield inability to defend atm, you make a good point.

Harry is a much better KPF than Lobb of today though. he’s up the top of the Colman for a reason. consistency and accuracy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 6:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 7:59 pm
Posts: 1127
CK95 wrote:
I recall someone phoning the radio & making a good point about Harry & Charlie.

As individuals, they are an 8/10 player, maybe 9.

But as a pairing, they're a 6 or 7


i think that was true in the past but not for the last 24 weeks.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:32 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:30 pm
Posts: 379
Enjoying the rational discussion going on here. I agree that some sort of change is needed. I remember when Cinq took a few players to the cleaners and it surprised the opposition for a while. I suppose the question is do we go with our traditional line up pre finals (on the big assumption we still make it) and then spring surprises in the finals. Don't know the answer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
Braithy wrote:

harry would make a good CHB. soft as butter like his brother, but still ... he's a proper athlete, A+ hands, proper height and has a peach of a left foot when field kicking.


You're watching a different player to me. Harry is a poor field kick IMHO. A poor kick is the last thing our defence needs. His strength is his endurance, speed and contested marking. Leave him where he does his best work.
I don't understand the negativity towards our forward line. We're the highest scoring team in the AFL, despite being 9th for inside 50's, we're second in the league for creating scores from our forward half and we're 3rd in the AFL for inside 50 tackles. So the forward line is our one strength IMO. Get some players who can actually kick the ball half decent to our forwards and they'd be unstoppable.

When our midfield get's up and going, we're a serious football side with the strength forward of centre. You don't throw that away with hail mary's this late in the season.
You don't take away something that is working to fix something that isn't. You end up with problems on both lines. Get our midfield to defend properly, sort out our abysmal defensive 50 stoppages (stoppage and defensive coaches!) and our defence will get by.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 7:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
it's not so much, there's negativity towards the forwardline ... it's about how bad the defense is and exiting it has become.

some of harry's long field kicking this year has been elite. imo he's at his best wheeling and going 50+, no time to think about set shots and all that. at chb i could imagine him kicking through to the F50 arc where martin or williams could be 1-on-1 and charlie too. before they get a chance to sag off & double charlie.


the other thing... i think we're going to be without cerra until next season. that midfield is taking a big hit without him. walsh is so far down on form (and maybe health) kennedy, cripps and hewett is slow. so slow.

maybe H to CHB and we're suddenly more balanced across every line across the park, and not relying on our mids to dominate theirs.


we're at the stage, this sunday Vs the hawks, if we lose we're just about done. if you don't throw a hail mary right now ... you never do.


but none of that fixes the biggest problem we have. F50 entry. 2 of the worst 5 mids in the game at delivering F50 efficiency are on the blues. kennedy and i forget the other. maybe it was walsh?

elijah, orazio and newman need to get forward. they're maybe our best at delivering it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
Braithy wrote:
but none of that fixes the biggest problem we have. F50 entry. 2 of the worst 5 mids in the game at delivering F50 efficiency are on the blues. kennedy and i forget the other. maybe it was walsh?

elijah, orazio and newman need to get forward. they're maybe our best at delivering it?


Yep. Walsh is in the lowest 5 ranked inside 50 kicks. Our midfield needs something different. Hewitt is a goer but he disposal is third rate.
I'm not sure if Lord deserves a go. I haven't watched a lot of him but we need a point of difference in the middle. Can Lord kick the ball more than 50m because apart from Kennedy, our mids lack penetration and class. That's why I'm keen to see Saad or similar get a run in the middle. Look at the difference fast feet like Papley, Brent Daniels etc make when they're around the ball. Our mids exit stoppage sideways because they don't have the pace to straighten up like opposition mids do against us.

Use something that's not working to try change. Saad isn't at his best at the moment in defence. Throw something different at the opposition. Get some offensive/defensive dynamic movement around the ball.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10461
Get Elijah and Williams more through the midfield. That will sharpen us up.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:27 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
but none of that fixes the biggest problem we have. F50 entry. 2 of the worst 5 mids in the game at delivering F50 efficiency are on the blues. kennedy and i forget the other. maybe it was walsh?

elijah, orazio and newman need to get forward. they're maybe our best at delivering it?


Yep. Walsh is in the lowest 5 ranked inside 50 kicks. Our midfield needs something different. Hewitt is a goer but he disposal is third rate.
I'm not sure if Lord deserves a go. I haven't watched a lot of him but we need a point of difference in the middle. Can Lord kick the ball more than 50m because apart from Kennedy, our mids lack penetration and class. That's why I'm keen to see Saad or similar get a run in the middle. Look at the difference fast feet like Papley, Brent Daniels etc make when they're around the ball. Our mids exit stoppage sideways because they don't have the pace to straighten up like opposition mids do against us.

Use something that's not working to try change. Saad isn't at his best at the moment in defence. Throw something different at the opposition. Get some offensive/defensive dynamic movement around the ball.



1000% we need a point of difference. i saw in the twos they were running motlop out of the centre. not sure how that went? i remember when we bought saad, it was with the promise of getting him up the ground and running thru the middle more. maybe he's the one!


with cerra out, we need someone with a bit of squirt, or someone who can arrow a foot pass 40-50m and flat. or capable of both, would be ideal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
SurreyBlue wrote:
Get Elijah and Williams more through the midfield. That will sharpen us up.


Elijah spent a few weeks as a starting midfielder. His defensive skills weren't up to it.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:37 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
one thing for sure. this weekend, it's time to find the killer instinct.

end the hawks season, be ruthless about it, and go on a run.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17936
Yep. I haven't lost hope. It was our conversion that cost us Saturday IMHO. Our effort was very good.
I believe there's still a good chance we'll still finish top 4. We're one game out and 4 of the top 6 play each other this week.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:46 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
hope you're right. top 4 would be a dream. find some form, grab a home final at some point for a prelim.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3560
Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:

harry would make a good CHB. soft as butter like his brother, but still ... he's a proper athlete, A+ hands, proper height and has a peach of a left foot when field kicking.


You're watching a different player to me. Harry is a poor field kick IMHO. A poor kick is the last thing our defence needs. His strength is his endurance, speed and contested marking. Leave him where he does his best work.
I don't understand the negativity towards our forward line. We're the highest scoring team in the AFL, despite being 9th for inside 50's, we're second in the league for creating scores from our forward half and we're 3rd in the AFL for inside 50 tackles. So the forward line is our one strength IMO. Get some players who can actually kick the ball half decent to our forwards and they'd be unstoppable.

When our midfield get's up and going, we're a serious football side with the strength forward of centre. You don't throw that away with hail mary's this late in the season.
You don't take away something that is working to fix something that isn't. You end up with problems on both lines. Get our midfield to defend properly, sort out our abysmal defensive 50 stoppages (stoppage and defensive coaches!) and our defence will get by.


I can't dispute the stats but by my observations:
1. forwards congregate in the same area
2. As a consequence, forwards don't spread defence
3. Defenders take the ground ball too easily out of our F50 after kicking to contest
4. Forwards constantly flying for the same mark
5. Small forwards rarely "crumb"
6. H and Curnow rarely try to tap ball to advantage of small forwards when they know they can't mark
7. Curnow and too a lesser extend H don't lead as often as they should (yes, i get that what happens up the field may contribute)
8. Curnow is either dumb or lazy with his constant need to wrestle rather than use his athleticism
9. Rarely see small forwards lead

Having said all of that, i agree 100% that our mid-fwd transition is abysmal, poor decision making, poor executiion, no lowering of eyes, no smarts to realise that some leads are dummy leads

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:19 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3560
Blue Vain wrote:
Yep. I haven't lost hope. It was our conversion that cost us Saturday IMHO. Our effort was very good.
I believe there's still a good chance we'll still finish top 4. We're one game out and 4 of the top 6 play each other this week.


Conversion and/or wasting opportunities inside F50 is also a function of dumb football up the field (too slow to react, poor execution decision making, fwds not providing a clear option, putting team mate under more pressure etc.)

To me, conversion is also impacted by fluidity up the field

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:32 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4907
Blue Vain wrote:
I believe there's still a good chance we'll still finish top 4.

Yes if we win our remaining 3 matches then top 4 a good chance - probably decided by a couple of percentage points.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 10:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:58 pm
Posts: 1919
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 10:38 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10461
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Get Elijah and Williams more through the midfield. That will sharpen us up.


Elijah spent a few weeks as a starting midfielder. His defensive skills weren't up to it.


I thought he was very good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 05, 2024 10:47 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9581
Location: Australia
SurreyBlue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Get Elijah and Williams more through the midfield. That will sharpen us up.


Elijah spent a few weeks as a starting midfielder. His defensive skills weren't up to it.


I thought he was very good.


…at being unaccountable


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 216 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group