jezzarules wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
No 1 contributor to the loss
Bigger contributions to the loss
-, Midfield not being able to get clearance (despite often having in their hands)
- tackles - need to stick more
- need more run & carry. We often kick too soon or if trying to handball chain we do too many (usually giving back to the guy who was hot)
- F50 entries (always an issue) bombing long instead of spotting up players. If Charlie is double teamed we should have loose guys elsewhere and should have a tactic to play through whoever's opponent is zoning off.
- Q1 we went helter skelter and earned plenty of chances but needed to cool the jets for finishing off ( which we did in Q2)
- Kemp I like but he dropped a bunch of marks where he'd done well to compete but the ball consistently spilled to them close to goal
- Speaking of Kemp, playing him undersized (again) on Esava does us no favours. Should have been switched with Young from the start.
- Ollie I lost count of his direct turnovers
- We are playing a territory game which partly explains the bombing long etc but this relies on pressure applied to keep it in and hold the territory. If we can't apply pressure we need to revert to possession game but we're not good at that so we need the pressure.
Do you actually watch Young play.
If you start the game 1 man down you never recover.
There is a reason Weiters does not want him down back.
He is the ultimate Chicken little.
I nearly fell off the chair when he took a contested mark on the wing without ducking his head.
When he ran forward with the centre clearance he was so afraid of body contact he just coughed the ball up.
Had an eternity to find an option on the wing /hf and completely froze.
We lost by 14 points he cost us at least 30
Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk