Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 8:58 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 314 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 12:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Paddycripps wrote:
I agree with some posters if we are to win this game, which let's be honest seems incredibly unlikely, we need to make a notable positional change to unsettle Mcrea.


Carlton assistants into the Collingwood coaches box?

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 12:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2700
I don't at all like the suggestions of moving Gov forward. Stability in the back half is important and he is working with the others well there. Only reason to play him forward is so that when he doesn't kick a gioal people on here can say how useless he is. Its the movement forward that is the issue ( and kicking straight for goal), how does having Gov forward solve that. Robbing Peter to pay Paul in my opinion. Only change is for Martin to come in. Ed out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 12:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
With our best injury list in years we will have two very good sides this weekend which is vital to our success. Pity the reserves play at Williamstown just before the Seniors this Sunday. Means a player or two may be held over.

Seniors:

B: Boyd Young Weitering
HB: Docherty Silvagni Saad
C: Acres Cripps Hollands
HF: Martin Charlie Walsh
F: McGovern McKay Owies
Foll: Pittonet Kennedy Cerra
Int: Hewett Cottrell Newman Motlop (Durdin)

Seconds

B: Plowman Akeui Marchbank
HB: Cincotta Kemp Cowan
C: Binns Dow O'Brien
HF: Honey Lemmey Fisher
F: Crocker Mirkov Cahill
Foll: TDK Curnow Fogarty
Int: O'Keefe Lieu

Not bad. We need some KP and midfield depth next year


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 1:02 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:44 am
Posts: 539
bondiblue wrote:
to suggest Doc is a failure in the CB having not won a CB clearance is a bit of a stretch.


Yes, of course it is. Doc only attended 6 centre bounces, 5 of them in the last quarter (replacing Cripps for at least 3 of those).
Cripps attended 20 centre bounces, apparently, as you say, only winning one. Hewitt attended 16 times, Kennedy 13, Walsh 10 and Cerra 4 (Cerra attended a total of 39 centre bounces, had 72 possessions, kicked 3 goals, 18 tackles and 17 overall clearances in the three games prior to the Doggies game. Unfortunately, he is the only on-baller, except Walsh, who can play in a position other than on-ball. Basically, he was moved to the back flank so Kennedy could play.)

For the Dogs, Bont attended 22 times (96%) and Smith the same as Cripps with 20. (imagine having a classy speedster like Smith at your centre bounces!). And Kennedy did not go exclusively to Bont and keep him to 3 clearances as BV has misinformed us - in the last quarter at least he seemed more interested in Smith, had a couple on Macrae. And there was no interchange blunder that kept BV's champion out the game in the last quarter. He was rotated off at about the 16 minute mark for about 3-4 minutes and then off again at about the 7.5 minute mark for about 3 minutes.

bondiblue wrote:
If anything, we need more players to run through there like other teams do with their small forwards. Mix it up. Spread the load. Keep 'em fresh.


About a month ago, Voss said something like "now we got all our bulls back on the field, we should see the real Carlton." Well, he was right except not in the way he meant because that was just before the Adelaide game. Nothing seems to have changed. Maybe we just don't have the personnel. But I don't buy that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 1:09 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2742
Based on everything I’ve seen and heard from the club, I don’t think there will be any structural/positional changes like moving McG forward, moving Jack back etc…
There might be some personnel changes based on execution such as Boyd in to improve backline disposal/distribution but I even doubt there will be much of that.
I think Voss believes in his system and will implore the players to stick to it but to improve their execution.
Most likely changes, if any, will be minor to bring in a perceived upgrade (eg Martin) or if someone is injured or needs a rest (I think the AFL initially reported that Holland’s was subbed due to injury).
Most likely for me:
In: Martin (LOB if Hollands is out)
Out: Ed (Hollands if injured/rested)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 2:19 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2022 3:56 am
Posts: 75
Based on recent evidence of both clubs, can't see us getting near them.

Just inquisitive as to which one of Hoskin Elliot, Jamie Elliott of Mcdreary bobs up with 4 goals.
Or will bobby bob up ?

CFC = snow flakes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 2:52 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13195
Location: Melbourne
Is this the thing where you can give up your ticket so it's available for use by someone else?

kezza wrote:
CFC8795 wrote:
Lol,
The club sent out a text to supporters with tickets to next Sunday's game encouraging them to attend the game. If they don't want to attend,,supporters are requested to give their tickets to someone who will show up. :smoking:

I have a reserved seat membership. Last week lots of people around me said they are not going this week.
I will be going.
Hoping for a miracle.


Good on you kezza.
I don't think I'll be going this week.
It's just not fun this year and weekend/spare time is precious.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 3:28 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:31 pm
Posts: 932
Hard to get excited for this game given the tripe we’ve dished up recently and the well below par form of a number of senior players
Hard to make many logical arguments as to why we win this one but let’s see what happens


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 3:47 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
17th Premiership wrote:
Based on everything I’ve seen and heard from the club, I don’t think there will be any structural/positional changes like moving McG forward, moving Jack back etc…
There might be some personnel changes based on execution such as Boyd in to improve backline disposal/distribution but I even doubt there will be much of that.
I think Voss believes in his system and will implore the players to stick to it but to improve their execution.
Most likely changes, if any, will be minor to bring in a perceived upgrade (eg Martin) or if someone is injured or needs a rest (I think the AFL initially reported that Holland’s was subbed due to injury).
Most likely for me:
In: Martin (LOB if Hollands is out)
Out: Ed (Hollands if injured/rested)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Yeah I think Martin is the one, if they feel he is ready.

He does provide a point of difference.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 3:48 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Wojee wrote:
Paddycripps wrote:
I agree with some posters if we are to win this game, which let's be honest seems incredibly unlikely, we need to make a notable positional change to unsettle Mcrea.


Carlton assistants into the Collingwood coaches box?


Wouldn't that be good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 3:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
I don't think we are a hope in hell. Pies are in fine form. They have a good game plan they execute really well having stuck with it for 1.5 years now. In contrast our game plan and the execution of it is a dogs breakfast. Can't move it from defense, move it slowly, can't score.
If we win, we'd be pulling a performance out of the box, which seems incredibly likely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:02 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
Paddycripps wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
FarmerBlue wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Our forward attack is too predictable with 59..4% going to Charlie or Harry, we need more targets like JSOS and McGovern up there to make us more dangerous like Brisbane. Our duo is ranked no. 1 ahead of West Coast and North.

So I think our best line up this weekend against a team that runs and is damaging looks like this.

B: Kemp Young Newman
HB: Docherty Weitering Saad

Foll: Pittonet Kennedy Cerra
C: Acres Cripps Cottrell

HF: Martin Charlie JSOS
F: Owies McKay McGovern

Int: Cincotta Hewett Durdin Walsh
Sub: LOB



I have said our biggest issue is getting it inside 50 quickly and to the advantage of our players. In the second half on the weekend we opened up the forward line and got it in quickly to the best option. The small forwards then got involved. Intersting that Charlie was involved in three goals in the 3rd quarter outside 50

I agree about McGovern forward. Allows Charlie to push up and is another genuine marking option. Martin then becomes another option.

Our ball use and speed is improving we just need to convert better. I have said it before but McKay should be second ruck like Daniher. Allows more involvement and will help with confidence.

We then have a mix inside 50 of Charlie McKay McGovern Martin Owies Motlop & Durdin. That is a great mix if we use them properly. We can also push Cripps/Kenedy forward at times

I also wouldn't bring in Kemp. I rate him but the Collingwood forward line is smaller and mobile. Boyd in with Docherty Saad Newman Cincotta is our best match up


I agree

The Pies forwards arent tall.
Ive been thinking about Jack on Mihocek or Johnson, for the whole game.
Gov forward.

I think that mix looks better with the additional marking power provided by Gov and Martin.


Think Cameron will be back, maybe.

Um Cox is tall.


I liked BV's idea that Young follows Cox everywhere.

I didnt expect Cameron to play, but if he does. that changes the Pies forward profile a fair bit.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:03 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
My interpretation of Vossy's presser is Martin will not play until he proves he has form, and that's up to Jack.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 6:45 pm
Posts: 1754
bondiblue wrote:
My interpretation of Vossy's presser is Martin will not play until he proves he has form, and that's up to Jack.


My interpretation of Voss's press conference is that he has no idea how to turn our season around and we are cooked.
Seriously that is 11 min of my life I will never get back.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Bondi Beach
deano35 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
My interpretation of Vossy's presser is Martin will not play until he proves he has form, and that's up to Jack.


My interpretation of Voss's press conference is that he has no idea how to turn our season around and we are cooked.
Seriously that is 11 min of my life I will never get back.


Certainly seems like a work in progress.

These small incremental changes he talks about this year are one thing, but I thought we did that last year and during this season. I cant see any improvement from last year TBH. Our foprm isnt even close to last couple games on 2022.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:43 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Hate to say it, as much as I think we need to play a more aggressive brand, I half wonder this Sunday our best chance is to try and stick to the slow game style, just to defend as best we can. Coll's game plan is all about fast ball movement and they can score very quickly if they can move the ball quickly to their forwards from defense. I don't think our quick game is anywhere near ready to win against the top seed side, who play a quick game. A conservative approach and we lose by 20-30. Or we say @#$%&! it and take them on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
Shame Martin isn't ready, if that is the case.
He would add something and God knows we need an extra avenue to goal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 4:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2021 11:10 am
Posts: 1495
deano35 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
My interpretation of Vossy's presser is Martin will not play until he proves he has form, and that's up to Jack.


My interpretation of Voss's press conference is that he has no idea how to turn our season around and we are cooked.
Seriously that is 11 min of my life I will never get back.


I don't know why they bother anymore. Sounds like Politicians


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 5:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
billy_bongo wrote:
For the Dogs, Bont attended 22 times (96%) and Smith the same as Cripps with 20. (imagine having a classy speedster like Smith at your centre bounces!). And Kennedy did not go exclusively to Bont and keep him to 3 clearances as BV has misinformed us - in the last quarter at least he seemed more interested in Smith, had a couple on Macrae. And there was no interchange blunder that kept BV's champion out the game in the last quarter. He was rotated off at about the 16 minute mark for about 3-4 minutes and then off again at about the 7.5 minute mark for about 3 minutes.


For the record. I'm offering an opinion. No different to anyone else here. And I wouldn't want to misinform anyone about Kennedy having a job on Bont, would I? Maybe I should apologise.

But so probably should Michael Voss who said in his press conference "for most of the night, Matty had a great role on him, for a large part of the game, he was able to get that job done for us, but good players still find a way don't they? for certain periods of time, they still find a way. So they don't need a long period of time to do some damage but yeah, pleased with the way that Matty went about that tonight "

Or the AFL who wrote in their match report "It would have been fun to see Paddy Cripps and this year's hot favourite for the Brownlow, Marcus Bontempelli, go head-to-head, but the (somewhat spoilsport) coaches had other ideas. Matt Kennedy kept a close eye on the Dogs' skipper around the stoppages, while Tom Liberatore looked after Cripps."

I would have thought most posters with a basic understanding of the game would appreciate nobody plays on anyone for 100 minutes. There are rotations, tagged players going to others to create 2 on 1's etc etc. But it was obvious to anyone who has a shred of knowledge that Kennedy had the job on Bont. Perhaps I need to clarify more for those with no idea in future. :idea:

As for the interchange "blunder". I didn't call it that at all. I posted-
Quote:
Kennedy had the most centre clearances for us. Where was he sitting in the last quarter when the Dogs got on a run? The bench. Meanwhile Sam Docherty who had a grand total of zero centre clearances was in the centre bounces.
Meanwhile Adam Cerra who has been our best performed mid for weeks was half back for the second half. Docherty isn't a ball winner. He's an accumulator. He had 2 total clearances for the night. Kennedy had 8. Whilst keeping Bont to 3.


Them's the facts. Carlton hit the lead with 6.36 to go in the last quarter. The next 3 centre bounces consisted of a mix of Cripps 3, Docherty 2, Hewitt, 3, Walsh 1. In that time the Bulldogs kicked 3 goals whilst Kennedy was off and Cerra was sitting at half back. Game over.
I have a theory Billy, if you want to be a smart arse and do "drive by's" on other posters , be 100% sure. Otherwise you just end up looking like a dick head. :thumbsup:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 18, 2023 6:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
TDK, Boyd and Fisher in to the 25.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Thu May 18, 2023 6:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 314 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Still got the blues and 117 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group