Walsh wrote:
bender wrote:
Sidefx wrote:
Walsh wrote:
See I think the review will have its interviews and whatnot and will find out
a. the list isn't good enough
b. development and environment is at a professional standard
c. game plan is maybe too aggressive but that should be fine
d. relationships with players is excellent
e. list management has let the coaching group down and expectations are unrealistic
I predicted between 12-6 as I don't rate the list and think the attacking game plan kept us in games as applied score board pressure.
Don't have the midfield to compete which is bluntly obvious.
I predict 10-6 next year on the proviso we recruit better - much better - midfield talent.
If not then its 12-6
The way I see it.
And yet we currently sit 13th with the possibility of finishing up 14th behind......you guessed it, Hawthorn. Go figure.
yeah, that hack clarkson, so washed up, with a rusted on game plan and no flexibility.....
You forgot he was also sacked and picking up someone elses garbage.
Being sacked/moved on or whatever doesn't preclude anyone from being good in another job/role. Endless examples of coaches who have been sacked in sports worldwide who have gone onto be successful for other teams, even in AFL/VFL in years past (Matthews, Eade at Dogs, Parkin, Hafey).
It's been more over the last decade or 2 AFL clubs have been scared to give anyone with previous experience jobs, every single coach in the AFL at the moment had not coached another team previously (except Ratts), which is more a trend than a template we have to go by.
In saying all that, I would like to see what Teague could do with a bolstered football department, and proper support, rather than going in as is from last year using COVID as the reason. Either way, a coach is just a part of the puzzle, removing Teague in and of itself wont change our fortunes, as I think everyone here is aware.