jezzarules wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
Unlike previous coaches Teague knew what he was getting into- He was there as an assistant coach and would have know what the players were like - there was no buyer beware here
He has had this covid disaster to deal with be so has everyone else so that is no excuse
Under Bolton and Malthouse we were just plain rubbish week in week out - What I can't get my head around is that under Teague from week to week -quarter to quarter is the fluctuations in form - We can go from world beaters to chumps at a blink of an eye - It is like they all go place bets on during the breaks
It is this inconsistency that frustrates you the most as you know the list and the players have the ability - you never saw that under Bolton or Malthouse we were just consistently bad.
Not sure if anyone else is going to train this out of them or has the removal of the runner and lack of on field leadership
I presume this is because our game plan is too simplistic. It works when we have the run of the green and the scenarios fall into plan A which players know how to implement.
That in itself is too simplistic as under Teague we haven't been flogged like under previous coaches as well as decent experienced teams like west coast.
We have been competitive and in winning positions in nearly every game which means that although Teague game style has been criticised by all the numties in the media, does it need to be scrapped, further tweaked or simply given more time to imbed itself in the team.
What is clear is that we are playing a different game style than most other teams and I don't know if that is a positive or negative thing. Clarko started playing zone defence which was criticised early in his career as it was different to what everyone else was doing at the time and resulted in some shocking loses at that time. There were the same rumblings about Clarko in 2006 about game style and being too inexperienced as first time coach, yet Hawthorn kept faith in Clarko and reaped the fruits of that faith.