Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 08, 2025 4:34 pm

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 5 of 9
  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Blue Vain
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 3:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17998
Walsh wrote:
:screwy:


Where's your personal attack gone Walsh? Deleted it?
Lacking the courage to leave it there?

That's your style isn't it? When your inadequacies are called out, you start with the name calling and attempt to undermine the other poster.
One was called a Princess from memory, another a ballerina. You tried to drag down Frank Dardew's credibility whilst talking up your own capabilities. (Many of us who know Frank realise how embarrassing that is for you)
Others have been called "Darlings" when having an opposing view.

Try debating the point instead of being a petulant juvenile. If you disagree, give some facts.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Thu Jul 01, 2021 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Walsh
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 3:15 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
:screwy:


Where's your personal attack gone Walsh? Deleted it?
Lacking the courage to leave it there?

That's your style isn't it?

When your inadequacies are called out, you start with the name calling and attempt to undermine the other poster.
One was called a Princess from memory, another a ballerina. You tried to drag down Frank Dardew's credibility by calling him an accountant whilst talking up your own capabilities. (Many of us who know Frank realise how embarrassing that is for you)
Others have been called "Darlings" when having an opposing view.

Try debating the point instead of being a petulant juvenile. If you disagree, give some facts.
Or send me a PM. I'm sure we can all meet up at a game and you can have your chance to slag us all off in person. :thumbsup:


You are crazy - need to see the doctor. I dont even know why I am replying to you.
Top
 Profile  
 
killpies
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 3:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5818
Location: home
Hope we leave Fogarty in. Last time we played them he had, 25 disp, 7 tackles and 1 goal. We are going to need his run with Doc and Williams out.

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan
Top
 Profile  
 
jake_h03
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:46 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9037
Location: Melbourne
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
All we have done this year is fine tune the game plan and developed bit of depth as rookies have played alot of games this year. Kennedy and SPS have also been reprogrammed properly in the VFL.

Coaching a team to play aggressive attacking football with high skill execution is much more difficult to coach than setting players behind the ball and play negatively - any coach can do that.


What a load of shit. :lol:
SPS needed re-programming because Teague persisted in trying to turn him into a defender when it was obvious he was never going to make it. He's a forward/mid and finally after confusing the shit out of the kid, he's finally being played where he belongs.

As for your comments about coaching aggressive attacking football, that's laughable. The key is to coach a balance. To defend when required and to have an offensive mindset when you create the opportunity. Suggesting defence is about setting players behind the ball and playing negatively is simplistic nonsense. We have no concept of team defence. Our own coach believes the best way to stop an opposition when they have momentum is to keep attacking! He and the players have openly stated so.
We don't compress the ground when required to assist our defenders. That's why Weitering and Jones are in more one on one contests than other defenders. Until Teague implements more than one mode of structure and game pace, we are wasting our new recruits and our players are being under-utilised and short changed in their development.


Nailed it on all points


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:
Top
 Profile  
 
GreatEx
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 4:47 pm 
Online
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14542
Location: Sydney
killpies wrote:
Hope we leave Fogarty in. Last time we played them he had, 25 disp, 7 tackles and 1 goal. We are going to need his run with Doc and Williams out.


No one is going to be dropped. We're going to have a hard enough time replacing our enforced outs!
Top
 Profile  
 
99prelim
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
:screwy:


Where's your personal attack gone Walsh? Deleted it?
Lacking the courage to leave it there?

That's your style isn't it?

When your inadequacies are called out, you start with the name calling and attempt to undermine the other poster.
One was called a Princess from memory, another a ballerina. You tried to drag down Frank Dardew's credibility by calling him an accountant whilst talking up your own capabilities. (Many of us who know Frank realise how embarrassing that is for you)
Others have been called "Darlings" when having an opposing view.

Try debating the point instead of being a petulant juvenile. If you disagree, give some facts.
Or send me a PM. I'm sure we can all meet up at a game and you can have your chance to slag us all off in person. :thumbsup:




You are crazy - need to see the doctor. I dont even know why I am replying to you.


BV(and others) don't need me to defend them but I appreciated his calling out of your behaviour

BV got one thing wrong...you are not a petulant juvenile...they can be reasoned with. You are unhinged with ZERO EQ at the moment

You have now gone all rogue and irrationally combative, like a cornered beast applying a scattergun approach to all who challenge you

FFS read the room Walsh and stop with the hector-laden bombast you spew out continuusly

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!
Top
 Profile  
 
Walsh
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:08 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
99prelim wrote:
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
:screwy:


Where's your personal attack gone Walsh? Deleted it?
Lacking the courage to leave it there?

That's your style isn't it?

When your inadequacies are called out, you start with the name calling and attempt to undermine the other poster.
One was called a Princess from memory, another a ballerina. You tried to drag down Frank Dardew's credibility by calling him an accountant whilst talking up your own capabilities. (Many of us who know Frank realise how embarrassing that is for you)
Others have been called "Darlings" when having an opposing view.

Try debating the point instead of being a petulant juvenile. If you disagree, give some facts.
Or send me a PM. I'm sure we can all meet up at a game and you can have your chance to slag us all off in person. :thumbsup:




You are crazy - need to see the doctor. I dont even know why I am replying to you.


BV(and others) don't need me to defend them but I appreciated his calling out of your behaviour

BV got one thing wrong...you are not a petulant juvenile...they can be reasoned with. You are unhinged with ZERO EQ at the moment

You have now gone all rogue and irrationally combative, like a cornered beast applying a scattergun approach to all who challenge you

FFS read the room Walsh and stop with the hector-laden bombast you spew out continuusly


I prefer to pick and choose who to converse with. Those that are civil I return it in kind - Blue Vain I dont even read his/her posts due to his/her aggressive and know it all nature. I just dont find his/her posts informative to retort. You just enjoy attacking posters from what I have seen... you have attacked me on a number of occasions because I defended Teague. Now you go on another dumb rant.

I don't care about you mate - what dont you get about that? There are some very good contributors here that stick to football and frank dardew is certainly one of them but you and Blue Vain and couple of others try to play too smart thinking you are. I have no time for you guys.
Top
 Profile  
 
99prelim
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Walsh wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Walsh wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Walsh wrote:
:screwy:


Where's your personal attack gone Walsh? Deleted it?
Lacking the courage to leave it there?

That's your style isn't it?

When your inadequacies are called out, you start with the name calling and attempt to undermine the other poster.
One was called a Princess from memory, another a ballerina. You tried to drag down Frank Dardew's credibility by calling him an accountant whilst talking up your own capabilities. (Many of us who know Frank realise how embarrassing that is for you)
Others have been called "Darlings" when having an opposing view.

Try debating the point instead of being a petulant juvenile. If you disagree, give some facts.
Or send me a PM. I'm sure we can all meet up at a game and you can have your chance to slag us all off in person. :thumbsup:




You are crazy - need to see the doctor. I dont even know why I am replying to you.


BV(and others) don't need me to defend them but I appreciated his calling out of your behaviour

BV got one thing wrong...you are not a petulant juvenile...they can be reasoned with. You are unhinged with ZERO EQ at the moment

You have now gone all rogue and irrationally combative, like a cornered beast applying a scattergun approach to all who challenge you

FFS read the room Walsh and stop with the hector-laden bombast you spew out continuusly


I prefer to pick and choose who to converse with. Those that are civil I return it in kind - Blue Vain I dont even read his/her posts due to his/her aggressive and know it all nature. I just dont find his/her posts informative to retort. You just enjoy attacking posters from what I have seen... you have attacked me on a number of occasions because I defended Teague. Now you go on another dumb rant.

I don't care about you mate - what dont you get about that? There are some very good contributors here that stick to football and frank dardew is certainly one of them but you and Blue Vain and couple of others try to play too smart thinking you are. I have no time for you guys.


For someone who doesn't care about me, you certainly have stuff in your memory bank...that's so sweet...anyway, thanks for validating my assessment about you having ZERO EQ

And...I do not want you to reply to this post you little cherub you...after all, you don't care about me or have no time for me...do you have the willpower to hold off on a reply??? Ooooh this is soooo exciting, will he won't he will he won't he????

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!
Top
 Profile  
 
17th Premiership
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:27 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2752
aboynamedsue wrote:
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
ABNS, Freo don't play a tall fwd line, especially with Tabenar out. It will be Lobb and Traecey as their keys.

I reckon Cazbolt and Fisher (if fit) are locks to come in

Don't think we need Parks, I'd play Fogarty, Ramsay or Cottrell for extra run.

SG

Fair point about the need for run. I just reckon Parks makes us a little stronger in the air and he can play on smaller types. Intercept marks are so important. With Docherty out, I’d be inclined to give Parks a go at HB/wing. And perhaps having Parks in defence might allow Stocker to push up the ground at some stage in the match? Plus I seem to recall Parks did OK against Freo earlier in the year (might have been his debut actually).

By the way, it’s telling that Williamson & LOB aren’t in the conversation at all, despite all our injuries. What a shame those two, particularly LOB (1st round pick), never kicked on. Papers stamped I’d say.


They have not been part of our conversation. They might still be in the selectors' minds - we'll find out shortly.
I imagine that one of them might find their way into the team with Docherty out and the game at the MCG. If not, then it's true they will struggle to get another look in.

On a very slightly related note (re drafting), I couldn't help but reflect that as Burgoyne plays his 400th game - and still at a pretty high standard - that we picked Luke Livingston and Trent Sporn ahead of Burgoyne in the 2000 draft!
And, incidentally, Daniel Kerr went at no.18, Kane Cornes at 20, Drew Petrie at 23. We missed Laurence Angwin who went at 7 but thankfully made up for that by finally getting him a few years later :-).
Top
 Profile  
 
Walsh
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:30 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
What do you want me to say I am sorry for defending Teague and I should partake in your orgy of slagging him off to make you feel better

Defending Teague must have really hurt your feelings. Now you can go and cry to momma.
Top
 Profile  
 
grrofunger
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
How about that upcoming game against Freo hey?

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.
Top
 Profile  
 
SurreyBlue
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10555
Walsh wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Common sense prevails. Finally the CFC members get something back for giving up so much. Well done to ALL.


This is Freo's home game so they will get all the revenue that Carlton people will pay.

Not only they may beat us in front our crowd and home turf but will also fleece us with our money.


Rather Fremantle than Geelong. :wink:
Oh and we will win, 'if' we setup like last week (eg. Kennedy and SpS running through the middle) and play with a decent mindset. Fisher and Casboult in's should help.
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 5:50 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24997
Location: Bondi Beach
aboynamedsue wrote:
sticksaftersiren87 wrote:
ABNS, Freo don't play a tall fwd line, especially with Tabenar out. It will be Lobb and Traecey as their keys.

I reckon Cazbolt and Fisher (if fit) are locks to come in

Don't think we need Parks, I'd play Fogarty, Ramsay or Cottrell for extra run.

SG

Fair point about the need for run. I just reckon Parks makes us a little stronger in the air and he can play on smaller types. Intercept marks are so important. With Docherty out, I’d be inclined to give Parks a go at HB/wing. And perhaps having Parks in defence might allow Stocker to push up the ground at some stage in the match? Plus I seem to recall Parks did OK against Freo earlier in the year (might have been his debut actually).

By the way, it’s telling that Williamson & LOB aren’t in the conversation at all, despite all our injuries. What a shame those two, particularly LOB (1st round pick), never kicked on. Papers stamped I’d say.


VFL Player Review: https://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/968238/vfl-player-review-r11-v-northern-bullants

RE OBRIEN 22 yo had 12 disposals in a VFL game

Quote:
There’s no doubt he broke out the space with vigour which made it really attractive to get the ball to him but it was moreso where he ran and the patterns: rather than getting up the ground, he was moving laterally. That’ll be something to work on for 'Loch' and I’m sure he’ll bounce back pretty quickly.


RE WILLIAMSON 23yo had 13 disposals in a VFL game

Quote:
When the ball came in high, which it did a lot from the opposition, his thought process to be able to put seals on and help his mates out in the air was really good. Unfortunately, it probably wasn’t his day, in that he gave away quite a number of free kicks which really hurt us going the other way. I’m sure he’ll bounce back and have a good one this weekend.


Obviously both struggling at VFL level. Can't see either on our list in 2022 IMHO. OBrien may find himself a new home for a late pick or DFA. For a player who is reportedly a great kick, Williamson has been a turnover merchant in the AFL and VFL this year, and a late 60's pick in the draft, his form and output isn't going to save him me thinks.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
17th Premiership
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2752
Thanks BB.
Doesn't look good for those two...
Top
 Profile  
 
bluebo baggers
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3495
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
Newman, Casboult, Williamson are the ins

Sub from Cottrell, LOB, Honey or Parks.

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here
Top
 Profile  
 
Walsh
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:29 pm 
Offline
Banned

Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 5:55 pm
Posts: 2333
Picking teams on fumes or whats left of it.
Top
 Profile  
 
DesEnglish
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2858
We’ll, there you go.

In Williamson and Levi (plus Newman)
Out Murphy Williams and Docherty
Top
 Profile  
 
bondiblue
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24997
Location: Bondi Beach
How about the selection of Williamson for consistency? Gobsmacked TBH, and a huge surprise for most Carlton fans.

Teague said he only wants to give players in form a go in the seniors.
Then he added there wasn't any HB's to choose from but some players were playing good footy.
Willo has been selected as "a like for like replacement for Williams".

Can anyone see the the resemblance? Really?
Maybe 185cm Cottrell with his speed . Maybe 182cm Ramsay for 185cm Williams is close.
Williams Cottrell Ramsay are dual sided. Have youy seen Willo's right foot?

Typical stuff from Teague and his band of selectors though. Like the MRP, inconsistent.
Give a kid in form a go: Honey, Ramsay, even Cottrell has shown more in the VFL than Willo.

Even Williamson's favourite fan jimmae posted Willo's form didn't warrant selection.
Willo was degraded by his coach OKeefe in his report.
I hope Willo improves his kicking/ turnovers/ frees against and doesn't bite off more than he can chew, Paul Bower style. OMG.

Willo should come out breathing fire, and I hope that doesn't mean giving away frees as he has recently in the VFL.

Honestly, I'm not focussed on finding out more about Willo, as long as we win. Period.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue
Top
 Profile  
 
david31
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:51 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2019 9:31 pm
Posts: 932
Williamson one of the luckiest blokes in Australia to be included after his performance in the 2s last week
Top
 Profile  
 
Sydney Blue
PostPosted: Thu Jul 01, 2021 6:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21521
Location: North of the border
Walsh named on the bench

Should I be worried because often if a player comes out he is named on the bench

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  Page 5 of 9
  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Heavs and 46 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group